![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been wondering why were so few WW2 aircraft designs "stretched" in order
to get more performance or payload? I know of the FW 190D which was stretched in the aft fuselage section in order to compensate for the installation of Jumo V 12 engine. Could other designs have benefitted from the technique of stretching in one way or another? Was it not done because the designs of the era were not suited to it? In recent years even reworked C-47s have been stretched. Was there simply no perceived need to stretch a design? John Dupre' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Andreasson designs | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 5 | March 4th 04 09:15 PM |
Boeing's WW 2 Disc Designs | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 6 | February 23rd 04 05:59 AM |
Performance Designs 60 x 66 wood prop | Sam Hoskins | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 03 01:22 AM |
Marine team designs and flies homemade, muscle-powered plane | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 26th 03 12:41 AM |
Why are delta wing designs reputed to lose speed during turns? | Air Force Jayhawk | Military Aviation | 2 | September 25th 03 12:50 PM |