If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:48:12 +0000, Ian Cant wrote:
Paul Hanson wrote: And what of it if today's youth want 'instant gratification'? Should that not then be the goal for soaring operations to provide? If that is our reality, than we either need to adapt to it or fade into irrelevance. -Paul That is a very perceptive comment. If instant gratification is the primary demand from our marketplace, and our primary goal is to expand our customer base, then we should aim for that instant gratification. A single long introductrory flight in the highest-performance self-launcher to be found; with the promise of solo in a couple of days, private license within a week ? But perhaps the soul of our sport is that it does NOT provide that kind of instant gratification, that instead it rewards prolonged effort. I think you'll find that there's very little, apart from theme-park rides, computer games, watching movies and reading that provide instant gratification. Everything else, from every day activities like riding a bike or driving a car right the way through to complex and technical sports involves time, a learning curve and an input of time and effort from the participant. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
On Nov 8, 9:48*am, Ian Cant
wrote: Paul Hanson wrote: And what of it if today's youth want 'instant gratification'? Should that not then be the goal for soaring operations to provide? If that is our reality, than we either need to adapt to it or fade into irrelevance. -Paul That is a very perceptive comment. *If instant gratification is the primary demand from our marketplace, and our primary goal is to expand our customer base, then we should aim for that instant gratification. *A single long introductrory flight in the highest-performance self-launcher to be found; with the promise of solo in a couple of days, private license within a week ? But perhaps the soul of our sport is that it does NOT provide that kind of instant gratification, that instead it rewards prolonged effort. *Then we restrict our market to that minority of people with similar tastes. *We will not grow so big or so fast. *And perhaps people like that are happy to start out at the bottom of the ladder, learn all the fundamental skills and work their way to the top. *Blaniks or Schweizers as workhorses, with just a tantalizing glimpse of slippery glass to keep the long-term goal in mind, might then be appropriate. The glider does not matter so much compared to the inherent motivation of the pilot and the skill and dedication of the instructor. What we often do lose sight of is the need to offer a ladder with all the rungs in place. *There must be an affordable - that means cheap - entry rung, intermediate rungs to gradually increase capabilities, and top rungs for the most skilled and competitive. *That suggests a mixed fleet. Perhaps a 2-33 or Blanik, a 1-26 or similar to enjoy solo flight, an ASK-21 to transition to glass, a Cirrus or Libelle to taste peformance and a Duo or DG-1000 [possibly self-launching] before the new pilot needs to buy his personal sailplane of choice. Just a thought. Ian Ian, I'd buy your ladder if the ASK-21 was the bottom rung. The ASK-21 is actually cheaper in constant dollars than the 2-33 when it was new. Don't confuse "cheap" with "cheapest old crap available" If we had always insisted on "cheapest available" as the first rung, we'd still be training in primary gliders. Your ladder has been in effect for a long time now. You just have to look Frank's FAA chart to see how it's working out. |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
On Nov 8, 3:18*pm, toad wrote:
I think that it is certainly true that there are some number of people that would start and continue soaring even with the most outdated equipment, but there would be more people if the equipment and operation were more modern and more exciting. The question is how large is the difference, and would it pay for the additional cost. It doesn't need to be very new. My experience is that if you sit a brand new DG1000 (in 18m config, so no swoopy tips and winglets) next to a well-maintained late 70's Twin Astir or Janus then most visitors to the airfield can't distinguish between them. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
Its been said by myself and a couple of others in this thread, but let
me try to rephrase it: Those of you saying "well it worked for me" are missing the point. YOU are on the inside, looking out. YOU are one of the rare people who overcame the obstacles and pitfalls in the current system of enciting and training new glider pilots. You are NOT one of the millions of people who have no idea what a sailplane is, or how it works, or haven't ever given much thought to aviation. If we're only attracting people who are already interested in flying gliders, then we're not doing any real recruiting at all; and we certainly will never grow the sport. --Noel |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
On Nov 8, 7:09*am, Frank Whiteley wrote:
Here are the FAA numbers of all glider ratings, abinitio and add-ons http://www.soaringchapters.org/world_report/ Whatever we did in 1996, we should do it again. Can anyone explain the spike upward in glider ratings? 9B |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
At 13:43 08 November 2010, Tony wrote:
I'm pretty sure there is no or very little performance hit for flying the 1-26 open cockpit. My old club had one, it was a blast but it got cold at cloudbase. At one of the 1-26 Championship contests within recent memory, there was an effort to get as many competitors as possible flying with the Sport Canopy. As I recall (I wasn't there, I've only been to two of the Championships) there were six or seven 1-26s competing with open cockpits. Jim Beckman |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
At 21:24 08 November 2010, Andy wrote:
Whatever we did in 1996, we should do it again. Can anyone explain the spike upward in glider ratings? Doesn't this curve track the general state of the economy, to some extent? Think back to the late 90s - the dot-com bubble hadn't burst yet, and real estate values were still going only upwards, and would never go in the other direction. People had money to spend on optional activities. Or maybe not. Jim Beckman |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
At 15:40 08 November 2010, sisu1a wrote:
And what of it if today's youth want 'instant gratification'? Should that not then be the goal for soaring operations to provide? If that is our reality, than we either need to adapt to it or fade into irrelevance. Isn't that a fair working definition of a dilettante? Are those really the people that we want to attract into our sport? On the other hand, it is most certainly the folks that the commercial ride operations want to attract. I notice that when a 2-32 is available as a ride ship, it gets a lot of use. And it's always sort of entertaining to see how they can pack two folks into the back seat. Jim Beckman |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:16:11 -0800, noel.wade wrote:
Its been said by myself and a couple of others in this thread, but let me try to rephrase it: Those of you saying "well it worked for me" are missing the point. YOU are on the inside, looking out. That's not what Bruce is saying. Look back at his comment. I agree with him too: on Saturday we had a trail flighter and some starting student pilots out and were using an ASK-21, a G.103 Acro II with out Puchacz visible in the hangar. The visitors and students really didn't distinguish between the three two-seaters, even one Polish guy who knows his power planes well enough to know what a Wilga is. I think Bruce is right: if a two-seater has a composite airframe, is painted white, and is well-maintained even a Puchacz and an ASK-21 are similar enough that that anybody who isn't 'one of us' won't make distinctions between them. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Future Club Training Gliders
Whatever we did in 1996, we should do it again. Can anyone explain the spike upward in glider ratings? 9B The years 1992-2000 saw a huge increase in discretionary spending by the American population as the stock market soared. Soaring was a beneficiary of this spending but certainly didn't do anything to promote it. 2C |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Club Class Gliders | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 4 | December 3rd 08 03:28 AM |
Basic Training Gliders | Derek Copeland | Soaring | 35 | December 26th 05 02:19 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Soaring club close to NYC, with high-performance gliders | City Dweller | Soaring | 9 | September 29th 05 11:55 AM |