"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

Recently, Gig601XLBuilder posted:

Neil Gould wrote:
Recently, Gig601XLBuilder posted:

The difference being is that I can't think of one of those that was
latter found to be wrong that if acted upon at the time and as the
its proponents are suggesting would have had the effect of
destroying the economy.

The danger isn't in the "destruction" of the economy, as it is
within the control of human beings and has historically always
survived in one form or another. However, if it turns out that the
hypothesis regarding the human contribution to global climate change
is *right*, then the economy is completely irrelevant. So... what do
you see as the rational course of action?


First off let me rephrase to the destruction of the economy AS WE
KNOW IT.

The economy "as we know it" is in constant flux. It is not "as I knew it"
10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago, and is almost unrecoginizable
from 40 years ago considering that we were not owned lock stock and barrel
by foriegn investors then. We somehow survive, as "the economy" is
adaptable and resilient.

The same cannot be said about an ecosystem that will no longer support
human life.

Neil

Recently, Morgans posted:

True, the American way on the most part is away from violence as a
means to influence others.

Did you hear about this country that used to be known as Iraq?

Other than the occasional mentally disturbed murderous kook, I feel
that violence is not the way Christians try to make their point.

I think history would strongly disagree with this notion. Crusades.
Inquisition.

And, what about those folks trying to raise the perfect red cow in Texas?

Neil

Recently, Jay Honeck posted:

Our culture -- not our religion -- is the only thing preventing
IEDs and suicide bombers in America.

Wow.

You are not who I thought you are, Jay.

I'm saddened, by your stand on this.

I stand by my statement. America is a nation of many religions,
united by one culture. The underlying (or, rather, over-arching)
principles of our constitution were laid out by Christian men, but
the participants are far from monolithically Christian, and the
principles are not exclusively Christian.

Not all of those who participated in the writing of the constitution were
Christian. Some were not religious at all.

Neil

Recently, Matt Whiting posted:

Neil Gould wrote:
Recently, Matt Whiting posted:

[...] This will become very apparent
within a few decades when all of the global warming, er, global
climate change "scientists" are proven wrong. That will be the
biggest setback to science in our lifetimes.

Do you understand that, historically speaking, many scientific
hypotheses are proven wrong and that doing so is consistent with the
scientific method?

Absolutely. Now if only the evolutionists and global warming fanatics
would come to understand that.

Your two comments are unreconcilable. If you understand the scientific
method, then you'd understand the error of your concern about new
scientific or empirical findings impacting science in general.

Neil

Andreus wrote:


I suspect that this is why there are so many black men in jail, the inner
city culture does not demand that difference be settled in court, indeed the
entire court system is out of reach and somewhat of an anathema to the
entire group of inner city youth. So when they "take care of business" the
law punishes them and perpetuates the class. Islamic radicals are, I'm sure,
very interested in these young Americans.
It's odd, one solution is hard and expensive and will never be tried. The
other solutution is reprehensible to the extreme and at some point, I
believe it will be.



I'm a little confused. Do you think white suburban and rural youths are
out suing each other, hence not getting in trouble with the law?

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:kuxgj.25686$Ux2.22866@attbi_s22:

Our culture -- not our religion -- is the only thing preventing IEDs
and suicide bombers in America.
Wow.

You are not who I thought you are, Jay.

I'm saddened, by your stand on this.
I stand by my statement. America is a nation of many religions,
united by one culture. The underlying (or, rather, over-arching)
principles of our constitution were laid out by Christian men,


Nope. Jefferson was definitely an Atheist and the others likely so from all
available evidence

Bertie

Nope, Jefferson was most likely a Deist.

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Gig601XLBuilder wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

the temp change is almost irrelevant in itself. It;s the Wx changes
that it's going to produce that are the problem.

Also you're going to have to replace florida.


Bertie


Well they can't tell me what the weathers going to be with anything
close to certainty next month why the hell should I believe them when
they say what it will be 10, 20 or 50 years down the road?


Actually, forecasting has become incredibly accurate in the last twenty
years and is getting better all the time, short term certainly. I never
cease to be amazed at how accurate winds aloft are, for the most part,
and terminal forecasting is probably ten times more accurate than it was
even ten or fifteen years ago.

As to the predictions they're making long term, so far the trend seems
to be accurate. More wind, more storms. record highs and lows..
As for Florida, I can live with that.


Mmm me too.

Shame about the everglades, though.

Bertie



Come on Bertie, they said this was going to be a dry winter in the
Western US. Hasn't been the case.

Both of the last two years they have said would be the worst Hurricane
seasons on record. Both years they were wrong. If they keep saying that
every year sooner or later they are going to be right.

Grumman-581 wrote:
WolfRat wrote:

His Mother is white
His so called Father a.k.a. sperm donor is black

He was raised by his white GRANDPARENTS

So, his mother was a slut...

Ever notice that when a white guy dates a black girl, she's *really*
nice looking, but when a black guy dates a white girl, she's the
skankiest whore that you've ever seen? I'm not sure if that says
something about what type of girl would date a black guy or just that us
white guys have better taste ...... or both ....


Really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Klum

Neil Gould wrote:



The same cannot be said about an ecosystem that will no longer support
human life.

Neil




Please cite one legit source that says the current Global warming trend
is going to bring about an ecosystem that will no longer support human
life.

If humans are causing GW then with the exception of us doing something
that causes a VERY rapid and overwhelmingly great change (like popping
off several 1000 nukes) there isn't anything we can do to cause that
sort of change because long before enough had been done to kill everyone
enough would be done to kill enough of us to stop the human caused GW.

Grumman-581 wrote in news:47833669
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

What the moron ID and creationists are saying is "we have decided what
science should tell us and we will keep harangueing them until they do
so"

Wait a minute... That sounds just like what the Democrats and Sore
Loserman were saying with all the recounts in Florida... snicker


Actually, both sides were saying that..


Bertie