If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
"Denyav" wrote in message ... Nice way of dodging some questions. Nope its an accurate answer Very obviously. public hearing before the committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee counsel to be asked other. Monkey investigation designed by the designers of Pearl Harbor conspiracy to white wash their actions .Members of congress were only allowed to see what they allowed to see at that time. Quite the contary, the members of congress drove the inquiry and were not part of the 1941 administration See the minority report of the same. Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised. Yeah Right,you made it clear before,every evidence if it points to a direction other than offical direction is irrelevant. And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html Yet the very same Stinnett claims that all Crane documents about intercepted pre-Pearl Harbor JN25B dispatches have been removed from Archive II because of NSA withdrawal notices and none of then are available to public scholars or even Congressmen. Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the National Archive and that he got them from there And thats the truth you can check it for yourself. I have NSA have issued almost three dozen withdrawal notices for Crane documents up to this date,almost all of them affecting solely pre Pearl Harbor documents. Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date They stated not I am sure Sen.Thurman and Rep.Spence would strongly disagree with your statement. Hardly Yeah right,then you must ask Marshall why he offered his resignation upon this report? He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in 1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis were only 150 miles away from Actually nobody really wanted a war with Japan,but Japan was,unfortunately the key to thrust America,a country with a big German-American population but ruled by an Anglo-American minority,into the war aganist Germany . Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat" Zbigniew Brzezinski Grand Chessboard 1997. More irrelevance The architect of Afghan trap was right on 1941,he was also proven right in 2001. There arent too many southern baptists in London old son. But the threat the London face now is much bigger than the threat represented by the corporal or by the French Fleet,England survived under Roman rule and would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say at least. Aint no threat from bananas bwana Israelis have waited 2000 years to return to their homeland,they could easily wait for another 200 years to create the Greater Israel,but its very doubtful if England and London could afford to wait for 20 years. So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain ! ROTFLMAO Keith |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the
National Archive and that he got them from there Actually the "Days of Deceipt" was based on the first batch of the Crane documents transfered to College Park. After the "Days of Deceipt" appeared late 1999,NSA suddenly started issuing withdrawal notices. Today all pre-Pearl Harbor dispatches,including ones that Stinnett was able to see before publishing his book was removed from the Crane files. And thats the truth you can check it for yourself. I have No,you did not,go to College Park and try to see the documents Stinnett mentioned. You won't see any now. Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date Transfer of Crane Documents started in 93/94,before 99 only first batch of documents were released and they were the ones researched by Stinnett. Congressmens asked for access to Naval storage Vault in Crane IN. in 1995. Their requests were denied. He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed This honorable man, famous for his photographic memory ,was never be able to remember his whereabouts on the eve of Pearl Harbor attack. Memory gaps and word "irrelevant" are very common things in Pearl Harbor story. Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR Both FDR and Churchill knew from Magic intercepts that Hitler had to declare war on US in case of an US-Japan war. "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat" Zbigniew Brzezinski Grand Chessboard 1997. More irrelevance Actually its absolutely most important part of whole story,it explains why Pearl Harbor and 9/11 happened and why new Pearl Harbors and 9/11s will happen even more frequently. Only one question remains:What are the foreign policy issues? Are we talking about US foreign policy issues or foreign policy issues of Anglos,residing in US and UK and in Downunder? would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say at least. Aint no threat from bananas bwana Tell that to Sir David,David King to be sure. So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain ! No,I think 9/11 ,like its predecessor Pearl Harbor,was again a joint production of Anglos on both sides of Atlantic. |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
"Denyav" wrote in message ... Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the National Archive and that he got them from there Actually the "Days of Deceipt" was based on the first batch of the Crane documents transfered to College Park. After the "Days of Deceipt" appeared late 1999,NSA suddenly started issuing withdrawal notices. Its 'Day of Deceit' do try and get SOMETHING right, there's a good conspirowhacko Today all pre-Pearl Harbor dispatches,including ones that Stinnett was able to see before publishing his book was removed from the Crane files. And thats the truth you can check it for yourself. I have No,you did not,go to College Park and try to see the documents Stinnett mentioned. You won't see any now. Nonexistent documents are hard to find. Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date Transfer of Crane Documents started in 93/94,before 99 only first batch of documents were released and they were the ones researched by Stinnett. Congressmens asked for access to Naval storage Vault in Crane IN. in 1995. Their requests were denied. The inquiry you mentioned happened in 93. He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed This honorable man, famous for his photographic memory ,was never be able to remember his whereabouts on the eve of Pearl Harbor attack. Actually he recalled it very well, read his memoirs. Memory gaps and word "irrelevant" are very common things in Pearl Harbor story. Only amongst conspirowhackoes Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR Both FDR and Churchill knew from Magic intercepts that Hitler had to declare war on US in case of an US-Japan war. No they didnt, in fact the JAPANESE government was astonished when Germany declared war. "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat" Zbigniew Brzezinski Grand Chessboard 1997. More irrelevance Actually its absolutely most important part of whole story,it explains why Pearl Harbor and 9/11 happened and why new Pearl Harbors and 9/11s will happen even more frequently. Only in your demented brain. Only one question remains:What are the foreign policy issues? Are we talking about US foreign policy issues or foreign policy issues of Anglos,residing in US and UK and in Downunder? would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say at least. Aint no threat from bananas bwana Tell that to Sir David,David King to be sure. The only Sir Favid King I know is Chief Scientific Advisor to H. M. Government and Head of the Office of Science and Technology So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain ! No,I think 9/11 ,like its predecessor Pearl Harbor,was again a joint production of Anglos on both sides of Atlantic. You are of course incorrect and totally nuts. Keith ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
ts 'Day of Deceit' do try and get SOMETHING right, there's a
good conspirowhacko You are really good at correcting typos. Nonexistent documents are hard to find. Yeah right,specially after withdrawal notices for non existing documents were issued The inquiry you mentioned happened in 93. They were denied access.period. Actually he recalled it very well, read his memoirs. Yeah right,after many years he remembered everything that he could not remember before Joint Congressional Committee. He had memory gap before Congressional panel,He lied in his memoirs. Only amongst conspirowhackoes Do you call Marchall and posters from other Echelon countries conspirowhackos? No they didnt, in fact the JAPANESE government was astonished when Germany declared war. FDR-Churchill corresponce about Magic proves otherwise. BTW which channel so called US President used for the discussions about magic with Mr.Churchill. Surely not an US one. Only in your demented brain. Actually the designer of the "Aghan Trap" is very good in setting traps and also in exposing already set traps. US is not an Anglo country,its a multi cultural country and the numbers of Anglo-Americans in this country is much lower than German-Americans and Irish-Americans. Without Pearl Harbor Anglo-Centric policies of Anglo minority ruling class could never win the support of non Anglo majority. Similarily,without 9/11 policies of Anglo ruling class could not win the support of broad population. BTW What was the original intention of Lord Rhodes ? The only Sir Favid King I know is Chief Scientific Advisor to H. M. Government and Head of the Office of Science and Technology Congrulations,but do you also know that he exchanged some harsh words with George W in latters residence and George W.sent an official letter about this incident to Downing str.10 and complained about this British scientist? You are of course incorrect and totally nuts. Officials could only say what they are told to say. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 20 | January 10th 04 05:19 PM |