![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 8:41*am, Chris Reed wrote:
A pilot flying at the UK Juniors a few years ago described a racing finish in a K8, producing no more than a 200 ft climb from a 90kt pull-up. He said that a K8 in this mode was the ultimate efficient machine "for converting height into noise". Disregarding drag, the formula to convert speed in knots to the height in feet with equivalent energy is speed squared, divided by 22.57. It will take this much height, plus a bit more, to accelerate to that speed, and on slowing down you will get that much height, less a bit. For 90 knots this is 359 ft. At, say, 50 knots, it is 111 feet. So you'd expect only 248 ft gain even with no drag at all. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have time right now to run the numbers, but am interested and
will probably do that this evening... But looking at the Nimbus vs. K8 examples, The sink rates need to be factored in. If they both start 50 feet above the ground, and initiate the same degree pull up, as the speed bleeds off they gain potential energy. If they start at 100 kts and the K8 sink rate at 100 kts is 900 fpm, and the nimbus is 600 fpm(not the actual numbers, just for an idea) then during that time at 100 kts the nimbus loss is less than the K8. So, for that moment when both are at 90 kts, if the K8 is losing 850 fpm and the Nimbus 500 fpm, the K8 is still losing more. factor this in with the theoretical no drag equations and you should be able to see the difference. If from 100 kts they should reach 1000 ft, then you subtract whatever you get from integrating the sink rates, the nimbus might have lost 250 ft leaving it at 800 ft agl while the K8 might lose 600 ft and ending its pull up at 450 ft. The polars need to be integrated into the equation in order to get the actual differences. The same would go for a given sailplane wet vs. dry. As the polar is shifted to the right when wet, the sink rate changes. The wet sialplane, through the speeds in the range of the pull up would be losing less than the same sailplane dry over the same speed range. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Physics Quiz Question | Dallas | Piloting | 28 | August 14th 07 02:02 AM |
Pull up a chair and hear me out: | Vaughn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 2nd 06 02:04 AM |
Physics question | Rich S. | Home Built | 62 | September 14th 05 02:05 PM |
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | June 7th 04 05:57 PM |
Glider pull-up and ballast | M B | Soaring | 0 | September 15th 03 06:29 PM |