![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/18/2011 3:56 AM, Mike the Strike wrote:
One technique to launch underpowered self-launchers is to auto-tow the ship until it is airborne and then climb under power. The acceleration and ground roll can be a significant problem at high altitudes or on soft fields and the auto-tow is cheap and simple. Bungee launch without the hill! That would enable you to launch unassisted: stretch the bungey out the runway, climb in, trigger the release of the bungee, and WHHoommp! You are going 45 knots and off the runway. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/18/2011 9:09 AM, CLewis95 wrote:
Evan .. some have missed a few of the parameters I stated up front. The "model" EDF unit I am refering to advertises 38lbs Static Thrust ... I can cluster and raise/retract this "cluster" into the large bay of the Genesis 2 area that was designed to house a BRS system. (though I would experiment with fixed mount first if I ever actually tried this) Can you give a link to the EDF you are considering? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 6:42*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 1/18/2011 9:09 AM, CLewis95 wrote: Evan .. some have missed a few of the parameters I stated up front. The "model" EDF unit I am refering to advertises 38lbs Static Thrust ... I can cluster and raise/retract this "cluster" into the large bay of the Genesis 2 area that was designed to house a BRS system. *(though I would experiment with fixed mount first if I ever actually tried this) Can you give a link to the EDF you are considering? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) These are (2) units that I have been watching for ~ 2 years now.. hoping next generation would be stronger: TF 8000 (28lbs Max Thrust) http://www.ductedfans.com/TF_8000.html DS 94 HST (22lbs Max Thrust) http://www.ductedfans.com/Schuebeler...ed%20Fans.html I just noticed in reviewing these links that the Max Thrust is stated as 28lbs on TF 8000 ... I was using 20lbs for assumptions x 3 = 60lbs. In a previous reply I incorrectly said "3 x 38 = 108 rated max thrust" .. I should have said "3 x 28 = 84 rated max thrust" ... again I am using 60lbs for assumed thrust. There are a number of purpose built electronic speed controllers for these units. Curt - 95 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 7:43*pm, CLewis95 wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:42*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: On 1/18/2011 9:09 AM, CLewis95 wrote: Evan .. some have missed a few of the parameters I stated up front. The "model" EDF unit I am refering to advertises 38lbs Static Thrust ... I can cluster and raise/retract this "cluster" into the large bay of the Genesis 2 area that was designed to house a BRS system. *(though I would experiment with fixed mount first if I ever actually tried this) Can you give a link to the EDF you are considering? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) These are (2) units that I have been watching for ~ 2 years now.. hoping next generation would be stronger: TF 8000 (28lbs Max Thrust)http://www.ductedfans.com/TF_8000.html DS 94 HST (22lbs Max Thrust)http://www.ductedfans.com/Schuebeler...ed%20Fans.html I just noticed in reviewing these links that the Max Thrust is stated as 28lbs on TF 8000 ... I was using 20lbs for assumptions x 3 = 60lbs. *In a previous reply I incorrectly said "3 x 38 = 108 rated max thrust" .. I should have said "3 x 28 = 84 rated max thrust" ... again I am using 60lbs for assumed thrust. There are a number of purpose built electronic speed controllers for these units. Curt - 95 How about downsizing the fans a little and using them as combined air extractor and boundary layer suction/boundary layer control devices which give some thrust. They could blow air along each side of the fuselage tail across the lower part of the rudder and suck air from the intake vents and possibly from small slots cut into the top wing skin. Not a sustainer but it might increase the L/D by a fair amount. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 5:43*pm, CLewis95 wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:42*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: On 1/18/2011 9:09 AM, CLewis95 wrote: Evan .. some have missed a few of the parameters I stated up front. The "model" EDF unit I am refering to advertises 38lbs Static Thrust ... I can cluster and raise/retract this "cluster" into the large bay of the Genesis 2 area that was designed to house a BRS system. *(though I would experiment with fixed mount first if I ever actually tried this) Can you give a link to the EDF you are considering? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) These are (2) units that I have been watching for ~ 2 years now.. hoping next generation would be stronger: TF 8000 (28lbs Max Thrust)http://www.ductedfans.com/TF_8000.html DS 94 HST (22lbs Max Thrust)http://www.ductedfans.com/Schuebeler...ed%20Fans.html I just noticed in reviewing these links that the Max Thrust is stated as 28lbs on TF 8000 ... I was using 20lbs for assumptions x 3 = 60lbs. *In a previous reply I incorrectly said "3 x 38 = 108 rated max thrust" .. I should have said "3 x 28 = 84 rated max thrust" ... again I am using 60lbs for assumed thrust. There are a number of purpose built electronic speed controllers for these units. Curt - 95 The second one looks like it pulls 180 Amps - 10 KW which puts it at the very high end of the modeling spectrum. Probably somewhere in the 30,000 to 40,000 rpm range. yeah, 40KW and you are getting there. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 17, 11:53*am, CLewis95 wrote:
Electric Duct Fan (EDF) Self-Launch Glider? I have pondered this for some time now. *Electric Duct Fan (EDF) propulsion systems have been making strides in the RC model jet world and are challenging the use of mini turbine jet engines (now used on a number of full scale SL sailplanes) *Battery technology regarding power density and safety continues to improve at a rapid pace. (auto engineer recently stated that within 5 years batteries will approach the power density of gasoline ... hard to believe but ?? ) *EDF systems do not have the tremendously high exhaust temperature (~700°C) and decibel level issues. (Though not as loud, the EDF systems sound very similar) Assuming: - L/D 40:1 850 pound Sailplane (in my case Genesis 2) - Cluster of (3) currently available EDF Units producing combined ~60 pounds STATIC THRUST (AFTER taking into account loss of efficiency do to close clustering of intake ducts) - Battery capacity for ~10 minutes full power .. no reserve - 2,500ft Paved Runway .. No Tailwind ![]() - Sailplane pre-positioned on runway (not taxied to runway) - Goal altitude of ~1,500ft AGL As a "sustainer" I am fairly confident this would yield some success .. if only buying you ~10 miles ![]() from the hobby-physicists out there are comments on these questions: 1 - How detrimental is the loss of efficiency/performance when clustering duct fan intakes in very close proximity? 2 - With sailplane starting from rest, how long would it take to accelerate to flying speed? i.e. Would I need 3 miles of paved runway? and/or .. Would the batteries be dead before the glider left the ground? ![]() I certainly am not proposing a "replacement" for jet turbines .. only curious if the above scenario is at all feasible. Thanks for comments! Curt Lewis - 95 Genesis 2 Loves Park, IL USA I don't think a ducted fan is the way to go, but I could get excited about an electric sustainer in the nose if available for say10K with folding prop, controller and battery. Nose weight of the motor is counter balanced with battery in aft fuselage, but they wont 25K for the one installed on a LAK-17. JJ |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/20/2011 6:41 AM, JJ Sinclair wrote:
I don't think a ducted fan is the way to go, but I could get excited about an electric sustainer in the nose if available for say10K with folding prop, controller and battery. Nose weight of the motor is counter balanced with battery in aft fuselage, but they wont 25K for the one installed on a LAK-17. Possibly, a folding propeller design like the Carat uses would make installation a lot easier. The battery, controller, motor, and propeller might be available for $10K total, but you need a battery/motor guy to complement your composite construction skills. Any Genesis owners like that? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric motor for hang glider | Legend Length | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 09 02:14 AM |
Thor Agena launch vehicle with the SERT-2 (Space Electric Rocket Test-2) 700204 9139576.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:47 AM |
Electric Glider | Mal | Soaring | 20 | November 2nd 05 10:46 PM |
Electric self-launch sailplane | CH | Soaring | 2 | September 14th 03 01:49 AM |
Glider rocket launch | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | September 7th 03 07:18 PM |