![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I recently had a $1700 SigmaTek bootstrap gyro installed in our airplane and figured I'd relate this story. This gyro exhibited excessive precession since the day it was installed....in other words, it was defective. I called my avionics tech and asked him to order a new gyro. No problem. 5 weeks later it shows up and is installed (they build these things to order because, as we all know, gyros that sit on the shelf risk bearing problems and premature failure). Then I get the bill. What's this? 1.0 hour labor ($75) to R&R the gyro? I talk to my avionics tech and he says that while SigmaTek covers the DG itself under warranty, they don't cover R&R labor. WTF? I think to myself it's one thing if it failed in service at some point, but this was broken from day 1. Even though SigmaTek tagged this equipment, it's pretty clear it didn't go through sufficient "burn in" and general QC to be put in an airplane. So, I called SigmaTek today and they basically told me "tough...that's our policy and we're not changing it". They even tried to pat themselves on the back and say that they went over and beyond the call by doing a swap with a new unit when refurbishing the original is "strict policy". When I point out that I paid for a NEW gyro, so I would naturally expect nothing less than a NEW gyro, they are still not convinced that this is merely adequate post-sale support. Since my issue was never with the Avionics shop, I paid their invoice, but SigmaTek is now on my $hit list. While I positively LOVE their gyros, I HATE their post-sale support. Apparently (my avionics tech tells me) this is a common gripe with many avionics/systems vendors. He said that he had many customer complaints regarding the JPI engine analyzers, for example, and R&R labor was getting out of hand, so now in his quotes for those systems he explicitly states that R&R labor is not covered. I recommended he make that boilerplate in all quotes so people are not surprised to learn that they might have to pay for a manufacturer's mistake. So, I suppose the moral of the story is Caveat Emptor. If you're getting something installed, be sure to ask about who is responsible for what if the unit/equipment needs to be taken out of the airplane for so-called "warranty" service. A gyro is pretty simple to remove, but a some other system intertwined with the aircraft's innards? Could amount to BIG bucks. Safe flying, -Doug -- -------------------- Doug Vetter, CFIMEIA http://www.dvcfi.com -------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 93 | December 20th 04 02:17 PM |
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies | Bill Berle | Home Built | 3 | July 8th 04 07:01 AM |
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 8 | July 8th 04 07:01 AM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 04:53 AM |
Beware of the Bug (IWBTM) | pacplyer | Home Built | 0 | March 9th 04 06:33 AM |