A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Step-up Planning



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 04, 03:35 PM
Jeremy Lew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I know nothing first hand about this class of plane, but I recently read an
article [1] on the Malibu Mirage, and it seems to get within shouting
distance of your requirements:

Ceiling 25,000
Top speed: 220kts
Range: 1055nm
Cost per hour: $200-$300 (direct + indirect)

http://www.avweb.com/news/usedacft/182792-1.html




  #2  
Old October 3rd 04, 08:39 PM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sami,

I got into this hunt late, but I read a lot of the posts, and our resident
Mu 2 jockey is spot on.Especially with the suggestion to go for more weather
gear and altitude and less speed. I see you are ready to drop
pressurization, and thats good for several reasons.

If you like everything about the Arrow except speed, you might look into a
Mooney Bravo with TKS. It gets higher, goes faster, and you know how to use
the turbo already, so it will be a natural step up. Not 250, but I believe
220 plus is in the cards.

The Lancair 400 is also a sweet ride. Haven't flown one, but people I trust
are raving about it. Only problem, you cannot get one at any price, gotta
wait.

Any turbo powered Beech might be a good idea.

Lastly, if you really feel the need for speed, the modded planes like the
Rileys could work out, but I am not that familiar with how well they
dispatch. I would try to stick with more conventional power plants if its
for business.

If you could spend more and wait, the D-Jet comes the closest to meeting
your wants. Unfortunately, they haven't even flown a prototype yet. This
plane and its competitors are throwing a lot of FUD into the old turbo prop
market, so waiting to step into that morass would likely be a wise idea.


  #3  
Old October 4th 04, 04:02 AM
O. Sami Saydjari
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks. More good advice. All of the posts have been helpful. This is
exactly why I wanted to start thinking about the next step early.
Everyone's ideas really help me understand what realistic expectations
are, and what the trade-offs are. My timeframe for the next step is
about 24-30 months. From what you say and what I have been reading,
some really interesting changes can happen in that time. The Lancair
400 should be available by then as well.

-Sami


Dude wrote:

Sami,

I got into this hunt late, but I read a lot of the posts, and our resident
Mu 2 jockey is spot on.Especially with the suggestion to go for more weather
gear and altitude and less speed. I see you are ready to drop
pressurization, and thats good for several reasons.

If you like everything about the Arrow except speed, you might look into a
Mooney Bravo with TKS. It gets higher, goes faster, and you know how to use
the turbo already, so it will be a natural step up. Not 250, but I believe
220 plus is in the cards.

The Lancair 400 is also a sweet ride. Haven't flown one, but people I trust
are raving about it. Only problem, you cannot get one at any price, gotta
wait.

Any turbo powered Beech might be a good idea.

Lastly, if you really feel the need for speed, the modded planes like the
Rileys could work out, but I am not that familiar with how well they
dispatch. I would try to stick with more conventional power plants if its
for business.

If you could spend more and wait, the D-Jet comes the closest to meeting
your wants. Unfortunately, they haven't even flown a prototype yet. This
plane and its competitors are throwing a lot of FUD into the old turbo prop
market, so waiting to step into that morass would likely be a wise idea.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want simple flight planning software marc Home Built 13 December 20th 04 04:36 AM
Pre-flight planning really is worth doing. Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 6 August 25th 04 10:17 PM
Route planning question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 3 April 4th 04 02:40 PM
Re; What do you think? Kelsibutt Naval Aviation 0 September 29th 03 06:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.