![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know nothing first hand about this class of plane, but I recently read an
article [1] on the Malibu Mirage, and it seems to get within shouting distance of your requirements: Ceiling 25,000 Top speed: 220kts Range: 1055nm Cost per hour: $200-$300 (direct + indirect) http://www.avweb.com/news/usedacft/182792-1.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sami,
I got into this hunt late, but I read a lot of the posts, and our resident Mu 2 jockey is spot on.Especially with the suggestion to go for more weather gear and altitude and less speed. I see you are ready to drop pressurization, and thats good for several reasons. If you like everything about the Arrow except speed, you might look into a Mooney Bravo with TKS. It gets higher, goes faster, and you know how to use the turbo already, so it will be a natural step up. Not 250, but I believe 220 plus is in the cards. The Lancair 400 is also a sweet ride. Haven't flown one, but people I trust are raving about it. Only problem, you cannot get one at any price, gotta wait. Any turbo powered Beech might be a good idea. Lastly, if you really feel the need for speed, the modded planes like the Rileys could work out, but I am not that familiar with how well they dispatch. I would try to stick with more conventional power plants if its for business. If you could spend more and wait, the D-Jet comes the closest to meeting your wants. Unfortunately, they haven't even flown a prototype yet. This plane and its competitors are throwing a lot of FUD into the old turbo prop market, so waiting to step into that morass would likely be a wise idea. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. More good advice. All of the posts have been helpful. This is
exactly why I wanted to start thinking about the next step early. Everyone's ideas really help me understand what realistic expectations are, and what the trade-offs are. My timeframe for the next step is about 24-30 months. From what you say and what I have been reading, some really interesting changes can happen in that time. The Lancair 400 should be available by then as well. -Sami Dude wrote: Sami, I got into this hunt late, but I read a lot of the posts, and our resident Mu 2 jockey is spot on.Especially with the suggestion to go for more weather gear and altitude and less speed. I see you are ready to drop pressurization, and thats good for several reasons. If you like everything about the Arrow except speed, you might look into a Mooney Bravo with TKS. It gets higher, goes faster, and you know how to use the turbo already, so it will be a natural step up. Not 250, but I believe 220 plus is in the cards. The Lancair 400 is also a sweet ride. Haven't flown one, but people I trust are raving about it. Only problem, you cannot get one at any price, gotta wait. Any turbo powered Beech might be a good idea. Lastly, if you really feel the need for speed, the modded planes like the Rileys could work out, but I am not that familiar with how well they dispatch. I would try to stick with more conventional power plants if its for business. If you could spend more and wait, the D-Jet comes the closest to meeting your wants. Unfortunately, they haven't even flown a prototype yet. This plane and its competitors are throwing a lot of FUD into the old turbo prop market, so waiting to step into that morass would likely be a wise idea. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want simple flight planning software | marc | Home Built | 13 | December 20th 04 04:36 AM |
Pre-flight planning really is worth doing. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 25th 04 10:17 PM |
Route planning question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | April 4th 04 02:40 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |