![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want value for the money, go Piper Pacer PA20 or converted Tripacer
Pa22/20. The 150 horse version will keep you out of trouble. Has a separate door for the back seat, performs as well as a Skyhawk. I flew my wife and 3 kids around in one out west (airport altitude 6500 ft. years ago and still miss that airplane. "Jim" wrote in message ... What's your opinion about the best taildragger that has room for at least 2 adults plus kids? Reasons and experiences please. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a metal 1947 Stinson 108-2 with the 165 Franklin for several
years. Delightful, but I didn't take it as many places as I took my Taylorcraft when I was single. Don |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jim wrote:
What's your opinion about the best taildragger that has room for at least 2 adults plus kids? Reasons and experiences please. Depending on where you live, a Cessna 170 may turn out to be a good economical 4-seat taildragger. I've carried 4 adults and full fuel in one (admittedly only one of the adults was on the rotund side). The nice thing about the C170 is that the forward visibility on the ground is better than the forward visibility in a PA-28 due to its down-sloping nose. The view over the nose in flight is awesome. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depending on where you live, a Cessna 170 may turn out to be a good
economical 4-seat taildragger. I've carried 4 adults and full fuel in one (admittedly only one of the adults was on the rotund side). The nice thing about the C170 is that the forward visibility on the ground is better than the forward visibility in a PA-28 due to its down-sloping nose. The view over the nose in flight is awesome. I used to own a C170 and it was a fun airplane to fly. I eventually traded up to my C185 and now that my family is larger (wife + 2 kids) I appreciate the C185 more than ever. I've done quite a few trips half way and even all the way across the country with the whole family. I don't think they would have had the patience to do that trip in the C170 not to mention that sometimes we were loaded to the gills. The C170 is not exactly a load hauler and is underpowered for any high altitude operations with four people. So bottom line, if you can scrape enough money together, buy a C180/C185. You will never regret it. If you can't afford it, go with the C170 and you will have fun with that too. ~Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Group Poll: Best 2+kids or 4 place taildragger? | Jim | Owning | 28 | December 2nd 03 01:57 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |