![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently read a a blurb on the SSA home page that claims the following.
High AVGAS prices ($6-$13/gal currently) are hurting aero tow operations. Ultimately, US soaring will have to adopt fuel efficient winch launch to keep the sport affordable Locally here in Ca we currently pay $5.60 per gal 100LL and there is an airport 20 miles away charging $5.21 per gal. An online search of current fuel prices shows that throughout the six continental U.S. regions the average price per gal 100LL is between $5.43 and $5.76. Is anyone aware of any U.S. fixed glider operations paying $13 per gallon, or for that matter any fixed operations that are paying in excess of $7? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Using the Pawnee as an example, operating costs are only driven partly by fuel, if fuel was 12/gal vs 6/gal, tow costs would not double, but increase by 30-50%. If you are in Socal, have you explored the non ethanol mogas available at Petrolock from cleargas? Mogas STC for Pawnee exists as long as no alcohol in the mix. I am all for ground launch, but really, clubs are the immediate short term answer. Joining a club with a nice two seater, one can reduce your off season and BFR cost significantly by spliting the tow fee. aerodyne |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:12:23 PM UTC-7, aerodyne wrote:
Using the Pawnee as an example, operating costs are only driven partly by fuel, if fuel was 12/gal vs 6/gal, tow costs would not double, but increase by 30-50%. If you are in Socal, have you explored the non ethanol mogas available at Petrolock from cleargas? Mogas STC for Pawnee exists as long as no alcohol in the mix. I am all for ground launch, but really, clubs are the immediate short term answer. Joining a club with a nice two seater, one can reduce your off season and BFR cost significantly by spliting the tow fee. aerodyne Mogas STC does not apply to the Pawnee D airframe. Frank Whiteley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:12:23 PM UTC-7, aerodyne wrote:
Using the Pawnee as an example, operating costs are only driven partly by fuel, if fuel was 12/gal vs 6/gal, tow costs would not double, but increase by 30-50%. That's direct fuel cost. The non-fuel costs are also driven by the price of fuel - but indirectly as pass thru. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That's direct fuel cost. *The non-fuel costs are also driven by the price of fuel - but indirectly as pass thru. OK - so the Pawnee D does not have the STC - what about all the earlier models made 20 years or so prior? The bulk of the fleet I'd wager. Insurance, maintenance, and hanger rent driven proportionaly by fuel cost? I doubt that. Show me the numbers! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 2:25*pm, aerodyne wrote:
That's direct fuel cost. *The non-fuel costs are also driven by the price of fuel - but indirectly as pass thru. OK - so the Pawnee D does not have the STC - what about all the earlier models made 20 years or so prior? *The bulk of the fleet I'd wager. Insurance, maintenance, and hanger rent driven proportionaly by fuel cost? *I doubt that. *Show me the numbers! Re Numbers: Yesterday in NV, mom & pop commercial FBO. One of ths launches in 15kt wind to 1,900 ft agl, ASK21, two pilots, one winch driver, (busy grandmother of 12), one $10,000 winch, 28 ounces of premium gas equals $1 fuel costs. (And who needs a wing runner on a paved runway?) Get with the program USA. The Germans have been doing it since the 1930's. The little UK still does more flights than we do per airport. Karen Henderson. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 2:31:23 PM UTC+1, Karen wrote:
Get with the program USA. The Germans have been doing it since the 1930's. The little UK still does more flights than we do per airport. Karen Henderson. Karen, the US has been doing it since the 1930s, too. And not all German clubs use a winch - I visited a nice soaring club near Aachen a week ago (they were flying everything from a DG-1000 to an open cockpit oldie) that has too short runways to consider a winch - the price of land would never make it economical. We have almost the same problem at our club here in St Louis - we own a big grass strip, perfect for aerotowing, but at 2700' just a bit too short for "get away" winching - and we have roads at both ends preventing extending much more. It's a nice option, though. Fun, too! If you can do it, go for it! But a Pawnee is a LOT more fun to drive than a winch... Kirk 66 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:31:23 AM UTC-7, Karen wrote:
On Nov 20, 2:25*pm, aerodyne wrote: That's direct fuel cost. *The non-fuel costs are also driven by the price of fuel - but indirectly as pass thru. OK - so the Pawnee D does not have the STC - what about all the earlier models made 20 years or so prior? *The bulk of the fleet I'd wager. Insurance, maintenance, and hanger rent driven proportionaly by fuel cost? *I doubt that. *Show me the numbers! Re Numbers: Yesterday in NV, mom & pop commercial FBO. One of ths launches in 15kt wind to 1,900 ft agl, ASK21, two pilots, one winch driver, (busy grandmother of 12), one $10,000 winch, 28 ounces of premium gas equals $1 fuel costs. (And who needs a wing runner on a paved runway?) Get with the program USA. The Germans have been doing it since the 1930's. The little UK still does more flights than we do per airport. Karen Henderson. Please, Karen take care with wing down takeoffs. Yes it can 'work' but the safety margins are tiny. If the slightest drag develops on the down wing, the opposite wing will accelerate leading to a very ugly ground loop or worse. A CG hook won't keep the glider straight like a nose hook. You're literally playing Russian Roulette - people have died. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:30:04 AM UTC-7, soarin wrote:
I recently read a a blurb on the SSA home page that claims the following. High AVGAS prices ($6-$13/gal currently) are hurting aero tow operations. Ultimately, US soaring will have to adopt fuel efficient winch launch to keep the sport affordable Locally here in Ca we currently pay $5.60 per gal 100LL and there is an airport 20 miles away charging $5.21 per gal. An online search of current fuel prices shows that throughout the six continental U.S. regions the average price per gal 100LL is between $5.43 and $5.76. Is anyone aware of any U.S. fixed glider operations paying $13 per gallon, or for that matter any fixed operations that are paying in excess of $7? http://www.airnav.com/fuel/report.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 12:30*pm, Soarin Again wrote:
I recently read a a blurb on the SSA home page that claims the following. High AVGAS prices ($6-$13/gal currently) are hurting aero tow operations. Ultimately, US soaring will have to adopt fuel efficient winch launch to keep the sport affordable Boy, there is a lot of editorial mixed up with facts there! Our club flies out of a 1600' runway. Winch would mean buying $1 million or more of land. Winch means more people. OK, if you have people wiling to work for free (or not count the actual cost of their time) good for you. If we're talking about a commercial operation, it's not at all clear that two more employees at x per hour is cost effective. John Cochrane |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel prices | Paul kgyy | Owning | 14 | October 19th 05 10:55 PM |
Fuel Prices | Ross Richardson | Owning | 60 | September 30th 05 02:06 AM |
Fuel Prices | ~R | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 10th 05 03:56 PM |
Our local fuel prices just went up again! | Peter R. | Piloting | 17 | May 28th 04 06:08 PM |
Fuel Prices | S Green | Piloting | 0 | May 9th 04 09:47 PM |