![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ShawnD2112 wrote: Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. It is taught and expected here too. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. Same here. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ShawnD2112" wrote in message ... Dudley, Interesting that the "right or wrongness" of the issue is of such a concern. Isn't it funny how different cultures view the same problem with different perspectives? Here in the UK, no motorcycle rider would even think of getting on a bike without a full set of leathers, helmet, and gloves. In the States, guys ride in shorts, sneakers, and no helmets where they can. On the other side of the coin, Brits "filter" through traffic on motorcycles, riding between lanes just to get through traffic faster, whether it be in the city or the highway. Most Americans think that's too dangerous to think about. Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. In the States, we would think that would lead to all kinds of altitude-related accidents. Different perspectives, but who's to say what's right and wrong? Shawn Hi Shawn; Your comment on using QFE in the UK brings up an interesting point that I'm researching right now and perhaps you can answer for me possibly. Here in the U.S., our altimeters have a Kollsman range of about 27.5 and 32.0. This, considering an average atmosphere, denies you setting an altimeter to 0 on any airport runway above about 2500 to 3000 feet MSL!!! I'm wondering, since QFE is common in the UK, and by definition QFE is a station pressure setting that will produce a 0 reading on the altimeter when on the ground at that station; are your altimeters in the UK equipped with a wider Kollsman range in the setting windows perhaps, and if not, how can a QFE setting be used at airports with elevations above our limits here in the U.S? It's an interesting point....or I must be missing something in my old age :-)) Dudley |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley,
if it's still useful for the number game ;*) ... Here at LAM (7171ft, for 30.54) I get 4850ft for 28.1 Cheers Chris PP-ASEL Student Glider Pilot New Mexico Dudley Henriques wrote: Hey, you mountain types out there :-) I'm doing some research on a safety issue and need your help . I need a post from someone flying out of Colorado somewhere, preferably Telluride or a field very close to Telluride. I need as close to the highest elevation in the U.S. as I can get. I'm not dealing with this issue in the context of right or wrong as it pertains to mountain flying. I need to know if the Kollsman window in your altimeters has a wide enough range to allow you, IF YOU DESIRED TO DO SO, to set your altimeters to 0 elevation on a consistent basis before take off at your field instead of a MSL setting. Again, I'm only interested in the possibility, not the right and wrongs involved with doing this. Thanks, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where are you Newps?
Dudley "Newps" wrote in message news:dBp3c.91932$PR3.1448201@attbi_s03... ShawnD2112 wrote: Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. It is taught and expected here too. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. Same here. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billings, MT. I did not get from reading Chris's posts that they adjust
their altimeters so that they get a zero reading on the ground. I understood that they do it just like us. If you really want the ground to be zero then you need a radar altimeter. Dudley Henriques wrote: Where are you Newps? Dudley "Newps" wrote in message news:dBp3c.91932$PR3.1448201@attbi_s03... ShawnD2112 wrote: Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to field elevation, QFE, before takeoff is not only allowed, it's taught and expected. It is taught and expected here too. Likewise, when approaching the airfield, you're expected to reset the altimeter to that airfield's QFE in the pattern. Same here. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news:IIp3c.4260$ Here in the UK, setting the altimeter to This, considering an average atmosphere, denies you setting an altimeter to 0 on any airport runway above about 2500 to 3000 feet MSL!!! The highest elevation (Ben Nevis) in the UK is under 4500 feet. The highest airport isn't even close to that. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
how can a QFE setting be used at airports with elevations above our limits here in the U.S? I bet it can't. The highest point in England is 3210' and Scotland only goes to 4400'. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BINGO!! Understanding the QFE question requires the understanding that all
anticipated destinations are below the limit parameters of the Kollsman window....which is correct enough....but like most regulations, the way it's written is just plain nuts!!!! Why the hell the powers that be would put in a QFE option without explaining that it's tied directly to the Kollsman parameters on the altimeters is beyond me. I must know a hundred pilots who think it's an available option anywhere!!! :-)) It's funny about things like this. I've been reading everything I can find on the use of QFE, even that American Airlines had tried having their first officers monitoring a QFE altimeter with the Captain using a standard altimeter setting on final approaches, (which I understand is no longer the case BTW) and there is absolutely nothing out there that specifies the limiting parameter for QFE due to Kollsman range limits on the instrument for airports outside the instrument parameters. It's amazing that the governing agencies who write this stuff just assume that sooner or later all of us will just figure out that only airports under 3K feet are eligible for the QFE option. Interesting!!! I have to admit, it's basic enough, but for someone reading the regulations, the assumption is that a QFE setting is available at all anticipated destinations. I haven't found a reference anywhere that explains QFE as available only within the Kollsman range. Understanding the regulation seems to require a prior knowledge of the Kollsman limits to understand the situation completely, which in many cases causes much misinterpretation of the QFE options. Dudley "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote: how can a QFE setting be used at airports with elevations above our limits here in the U.S? I bet it can't. The highest point in England is 3210' and Scotland only goes to 4400'. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message news:XSp3c.90616$ko6.554153@attbi_s02... Billings, MT. I did not get from reading Chris's posts that they adjust their altimeters so that they get a zero reading on the ground. I understood that they do it just like us. If you really want the ground to be zero then you need a radar altimeter. Well, not really. If you can get the actual station pressure, (not the altimeter setting for the station reduced to sea level ) and the airport elevation is within the Kollsman limits, the altimeter should read 0 on the ground after landing. This is the definition as I understand it, for the QFE setting. Dudley |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote:
It's amazing that the governing agencies who write this stuff just assume that sooner or later all of us will just figure out that only airports under 3K feet are eligible for the QFE option. Interesting!!! Don't you have this backwards? Shouldn't it read: Just because QFE isn't common in the USA, the manufactorers assume that it's not common elsewhere either, and sell unsuitable instruments? Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 12 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Airport Manager position, Fitchburg, MA | David Reinhart | Piloting | 6 | August 12th 03 11:46 PM |