![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Section 1.1
Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following: (1) A maximum takeoff weight of not more than-- (ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) for aircraft not intended for operation on water... (3) A maximum never-exceed speed (Vne) of not more than 120 knots CAS for a glider. Perhaps BeaglePig was quoting: (2) A maximum airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power (Vh) of not more than 120 knots CAS under standard atmospheric conditions at sea level. which does apply to LSA other than gliders... Unfortunately the synopses of LSA and SP put out by EAA and others, as well as even the summarized FAA brochure, omit the special glider Vne LSA definition, so it is easy to become misled... Bruce Hoult wrote: BeaglePig wrote: Vne has nothing to do with Sport Pilot Lic or Light Sport Aircraft. The top end speed limiter is the speed at "maximum continous power" at sea level. Which is 0 knots for any pure glider. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
BeaglePig wrote: " wrote in news:10pfmmr7ffv7l23 @corp.supernews.com: Only the fixed gear ones. The rest would have to be fitted with floats. The SGS 2-33, SZD 50-3, SGS 1-34, SGS 1-26, Std Libelle, Open Cirrus, ASW-15, H301, etc. seem to all qualify. Vne 120kts or less, under 1320lbs meets the requirements. The Vne seems to be the discriminator. Vne has nothing to do with Sport Pilot Lic or Light Sport Aircraft. The top end speed limiter is the speed at "maximum continous power" at sea level. Which is 0 knots for any pure glider. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
COLIN LAMB wrote:
"Well, one of the points was that certification as a glider means no medical. My point was that certification as an Airplane-LSA also means no medical." As of this date, that is misleading. If you have been denied a medical by the FAA, you cannot be certified under the LSA rules. This is a gaping hole in the present rules that may be changed someday. So, if you are a pilot with a medical and your medical was revoked, you are limited to flying a glider and cannot fly an LSA - unless you go back to the FAA and get a waiver or get your medical back. This is a case of the FAA being worried about getting sued. It also means that if something happens that causes you to believe that you will not get your medical, do not take a FAA flight exam and do not tell the FAA. Let it lapse and then you can get a LSA. The "previously denied a medical" part of Sport Pilot is quite a bone in the craw of EAA. I suspect it will be resolved soon. As I don't know how many glider pilots fly gliders specifically because they have failed an official FAA medical, I can't speak to whether this is a worthy subject or a very minor footnote of the rule... -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
BeaglePig wrote:
IMHO, there is no reason to get a "sport pilot" lic for gliders or motorgliders. There is absolutely NOTHING gained, and much lost. Absolutely true in terms of initial license. I don't expect anyone to choose as their first license to get a glider-SP license. However, for transition pilots, either from ultralights or Airplane Single Engine Land, this is a large improvement. A regular glider licence has no night flight restrictions, no altitude restriction, and most importantly, if you happen to loose your Drivers License, even for something not related to your health, you can still fly. Another interesting point is that 61.31(d)(2) solo of transition ASEL pilots to gliders also has no restrictions. This is why in my writings about SP I focus almost exclusively on 2-place LSA and SP. The passenger carrying in a new cat/class with NO additional check ride is the key. And pipistrel seems to be counting on this, since their Sinus and Virus motorgliders require but the stroke of a pen by two CFIs to make an ASEL into a glider-SP. I'm a big proponent of Sport Pilot, and even of S-LSA or E-LSA gliders, but for someone to choose to get a Sport Pilot-glider lic. would be foolish (you can still fly LSA gliders with a reg glider lic) Again, this is very true. We're just talking about transition pilots in two-seat gliders. The rest of the SP rule doesn't seem to have much value where gliders are concerned... -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark James Boyd wrote:
"I've never met an ASEL pilot who couldn't safely fly a glider in all the other (PTS) areas by the time he had learned to safely aerotow" ... [big snip] ... In the sense you developped below, it is certainly true, but would be equally true if you deleted the word "ASEL". |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 04:13 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 03:31 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 06:15 AM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 06:12 AM |