A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

3 lives lost



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 20th 05, 01:11 PM
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Absolutely! The AgCat did an Immelman and rammed the jet from
behind...

OK, all fun and tongue in cheek aside..
1. I am pro military flyboys... They put their ass on the line in
defense of the country, for meager pay..
2..It is a given that they have to train...
3. BUT! Other than the prohibited areas it is public airspace and the
over taking craft must give way...

Look at the Ninja flight in Florida that slaughtered an innocent and
totally in the right CFI... The military has a cavalier attitude that
you are obligated to stay out of their way as they bust speed limits,
altitude/heading rules, and aerobatic restrictions, in public
airspace... It is time to haul the military up short and for the courts
to inform them (in the form of manslaughter convictions) that they are
obligated to exercise due care because being faster and more
maneuverable than the spam can they are the burdened vessel... The
military absolutely has to place radar aircraft near the hot zone
scanning for civilian traffic to protect the public during training
maneuvers - and that is the bottom line... Consider the flip side of
the coin - Your wife is tooling down I-80 and an Abrams tank comes
flying out of the weeds and crushes your car, and her, flat and keeps
going... And the military tells you that it was a training mission and
therefore your wife was obligated to say out of their way...

The final reality, is that if a combat aircraft (training or not)
cannot see and avoid a 110 knot spam can, what chance in frozen hell,
would they have of surviving more than 30 seconds in an actual combat
zone against an enemy that intends to maneuver in close enough to kill
them?

Denny

  #2  
Old January 20th 05, 03:36 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Denny wrote:
Absolutely! The AgCat did an Immelman and rammed the jet from
behind...

OK, all fun and tongue in cheek aside..
1. I am pro military flyboys... They put their ass on the line in
defense of the country, for meager pay..
2..It is a given that they have to train...
3. BUT! Other than the prohibited areas it is public airspace and the
over taking craft must give way...

Look at the Ninja flight in Florida that slaughtered an innocent and
totally in the right CFI... The military has a cavalier attitude that
you are obligated to stay out of their way as they bust speed limits,
altitude/heading rules, and aerobatic restrictions, in public
airspace... It is time to haul the military up short and for the courts
to inform them (in the form of manslaughter convictions) that they are
obligated to exercise due care because being faster and more
maneuverable than the spam can they are the burdened vessel... The
military absolutely has to place radar aircraft near the hot zone
scanning for civilian traffic to protect the public during training
maneuvers - and that is the bottom line... Consider the flip side of
the coin - Your wife is tooling down I-80 and an Abrams tank comes
flying out of the weeds and crushes your car, and her, flat and keeps
going... And the military tells you that it was a training mission and
therefore your wife was obligated to say out of their way...

The final reality, is that if a combat aircraft (training or not)
cannot see and avoid a 110 knot spam can, what chance in frozen hell,
would they have of surviving more than 30 seconds in an actual combat
zone against an enemy that intends to maneuver in close enough to kill
them?


Well said, Denny! We all need to prod AOPA to get hot on this issue. Not to
denigrate your contribution, but this is preaching to the choir. Hmmm, actually
it seems there are some in the NG who haven't joined the choir yet. The 4-letter
groups have the clout to make a dent in this problem, maybe only barely. We need
to let them know it's an issue we want them to spend our money on.

Dave

  #3  
Old January 21st 05, 03:17 AM
houstondan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

most towns have a road, main drag, country mile or whatever where the
youth gather to do what youth do. think of it as an moa only with much
bigger motors.

without worrying about right & wrong or who is patriotic, isn't there a
"best practive" where you( the g.a. driver) A: stay out or B: make sure
their traffic control knows you're around? had planned to cross one a
while back (didn't happen) and i was real clear that i had a perfect
right to be there but i had also planned to let 'em know i was there.

now, i'm sure not saying the ferry-driver did anything wrong; i'm just
askin about what y'all do.


dan

  #4  
Old January 29th 05, 04:32 PM
mudskipper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Wow, that is VERY interesting. Could you provide more details on your
pilot friend's theory?


--
mudskipper
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3 lives lost Terry Owning 81 January 26th 05 04:39 PM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
Lost comms after radar vector Mike Ciholas Instrument Flight Rules 119 January 31st 04 11:39 PM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.