![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely! The AgCat did an Immelman and rammed the jet from
behind... OK, all fun and tongue in cheek aside.. 1. I am pro military flyboys... They put their ass on the line in defense of the country, for meager pay.. 2..It is a given that they have to train... 3. BUT! Other than the prohibited areas it is public airspace and the over taking craft must give way... Look at the Ninja flight in Florida that slaughtered an innocent and totally in the right CFI... The military has a cavalier attitude that you are obligated to stay out of their way as they bust speed limits, altitude/heading rules, and aerobatic restrictions, in public airspace... It is time to haul the military up short and for the courts to inform them (in the form of manslaughter convictions) that they are obligated to exercise due care because being faster and more maneuverable than the spam can they are the burdened vessel... The military absolutely has to place radar aircraft near the hot zone scanning for civilian traffic to protect the public during training maneuvers - and that is the bottom line... Consider the flip side of the coin - Your wife is tooling down I-80 and an Abrams tank comes flying out of the weeds and crushes your car, and her, flat and keeps going... And the military tells you that it was a training mission and therefore your wife was obligated to say out of their way... The final reality, is that if a combat aircraft (training or not) cannot see and avoid a 110 knot spam can, what chance in frozen hell, would they have of surviving more than 30 seconds in an actual combat zone against an enemy that intends to maneuver in close enough to kill them? Denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
Absolutely! The AgCat did an Immelman and rammed the jet from behind... OK, all fun and tongue in cheek aside.. 1. I am pro military flyboys... They put their ass on the line in defense of the country, for meager pay.. 2..It is a given that they have to train... 3. BUT! Other than the prohibited areas it is public airspace and the over taking craft must give way... Look at the Ninja flight in Florida that slaughtered an innocent and totally in the right CFI... The military has a cavalier attitude that you are obligated to stay out of their way as they bust speed limits, altitude/heading rules, and aerobatic restrictions, in public airspace... It is time to haul the military up short and for the courts to inform them (in the form of manslaughter convictions) that they are obligated to exercise due care because being faster and more maneuverable than the spam can they are the burdened vessel... The military absolutely has to place radar aircraft near the hot zone scanning for civilian traffic to protect the public during training maneuvers - and that is the bottom line... Consider the flip side of the coin - Your wife is tooling down I-80 and an Abrams tank comes flying out of the weeds and crushes your car, and her, flat and keeps going... And the military tells you that it was a training mission and therefore your wife was obligated to say out of their way... The final reality, is that if a combat aircraft (training or not) cannot see and avoid a 110 knot spam can, what chance in frozen hell, would they have of surviving more than 30 seconds in an actual combat zone against an enemy that intends to maneuver in close enough to kill them? Well said, Denny! We all need to prod AOPA to get hot on this issue. Not to denigrate your contribution, but this is preaching to the choir. Hmmm, actually it seems there are some in the NG who haven't joined the choir yet. The 4-letter groups have the clout to make a dent in this problem, maybe only barely. We need to let them know it's an issue we want them to spend our money on. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
most towns have a road, main drag, country mile or whatever where the
youth gather to do what youth do. think of it as an moa only with much bigger motors. without worrying about right & wrong or who is patriotic, isn't there a "best practive" where you( the g.a. driver) A: stay out or B: make sure their traffic control knows you're around? had planned to cross one a while back (didn't happen) and i was real clear that i had a perfect right to be there but i had also planned to let 'em know i was there. now, i'm sure not saying the ferry-driver did anything wrong; i'm just askin about what y'all do. dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wow, that is VERY interesting. Could you provide more details on your pilot friend's theory? -- mudskipper ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3 lives lost | Terry | Owning | 81 | January 26th 05 04:39 PM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |