![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andreas Maurer wrote: On 5 Dec 2003 10:53:17 -0700, (Mark James Boyd) wrote: A lot of different techniques - little consensus Bruce - Hi to slow and get slack out, then match speeds by diving Brian - Yaw to reduce snappiness when line comes taut Janusz - Shorter rope so tug and glider are in the same air Michel - Low tow and avoid slack line Let me add the standard procedure that I was told and that all pilots I know of are using: Extend the airbrakes (carefully - only about one inch) to get the slack out. Don't let the speed difference between glider and tow plane get too big. And if it does, what do you do then? That's why if I'm going faster than the towplane I prefer to store the energy by climing a little, rather than by simply throwing it away using the brakes, or a slip, or a yaw. The slack isn't going to come out until you're going slower than the towplane, and you need a way to get back to about the same speed again. -- Bruce |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Użytkownik Bruce Hoult w wiadomo¶ci do grup dyskusyjnych ... In article , That's why if I'm going faster than the towplane I prefer to store the energy by climing a little, rather than by simply throwing it away using the brakes, or a slip, or a yaw. But there's a risk that the towplane gets "out of the screen" because You got higher than it, and then You have a problem... JK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 16:59:44 +1300, Bruce Hoult
wrote: Extend the airbrakes (carefully - only about one inch) to get the slack out. Don't let the speed difference between glider and tow plane get too big. And if it does, what do you do then? Pray that I don't break the cable. That's why if I'm going faster than the towplane I prefer to store the energy by climing a little, rather than by simply throwing it away using the brakes, or a slip, or a yaw. The slack isn't going to come out until you're going slower than the towplane, and you need a way to get back to about the same speed again. Basically a good idea - but higher than the tow plane, especially in gusty conditions, is a place where I try not to be. Bye Andreas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me add the standard procedure that I was told and that all pilots
I know of are using: Extend the airbrakes (carefully - only about one inch) to get the Try this in a Janus. Extending isn't a problem, but I wish you luck closing them again during the tow. Chances are that after successfully closing them, slack is much bigger than before. Stefan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 11:35:46 +0100, Stefan
wrote: Try this in a Janus. Extending isn't a problem, but I wish you luck closing them again during the tow. Chances are that after successfully closing them, slack is much bigger than before. Why? I haven't flown the Janus that often, but to me its airbrakes didn't feel extraordinary to me? Bye Andreas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stefan wrote: Let me add the standard procedure that I was told and that all pilots I know of are using: Extend the airbrakes (carefully - only about one inch) to get the Try this in a Janus. Extending isn't a problem, but I wish you luck closing them again during the tow. Chances are that after successfully closing them, slack is much bigger than before. I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about. We've got: 1) a Janus 2) 1000 ft high ridges 3) frequent strong winds onto the ridges 4) airspace limitations restricting us to, say, 2500 ft in some of the places the ridges take us. So I've spent a fair amount of time flying the Janus at 90 - 100 knots and needing some brake to stop from busting the altitude limit. It's not a problem. See, for example: http://www.hoult.org/bruce/gliding/sasha/p17.html Someone previously asked if I always fly around with the brakes half open. Yes, on days like that, in that area. -- Bruce |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Brian Case wrote: small correction, I wasn't suggesting yawing the airplane to slow it down and take out the slack. What I was saying is if you move off to the side when the slack comes out it will automatically yaw the towplane and a nose hook equipped glider. No timing required just stay out to the side. Brian Thank you, Brian. A subtle but important distinction...being out to the side clearly means the slack is taken out with quite a bit less "snappiness." And this is a different dampening than the yaw of the glider and tug when the line comes taut. Excellent! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
small correction, I wasn't suggesting yawing the airplane to slow it
down and take out the slack. What I was saying is if you move off to the side when the slack comes out it will automatically yaw the towplane and a nose hook equipped glider. No timing required just stay out to the side. Brian If we can base the idea on two premises, first that we have a lot of slack and second that breaking the rope is undesirable. The reality is that large amounts of slack tend to result in big speed differentials between the tow plane and the glider, particularly with glass gliders and powerful tugs. While the rope is slack, no thrust is transmitted to the glider. Even with no pitch change, the glider begins decelerating. Due to the loss of the glider's drag, the tug either accelerates or increases rate of climb (depending on the tow pilot's actions). Presuming a beginning generous gust or slap, and big slack, this allows a long enough time period for a noticeable speed differential to be created. Now, with differential speed, the slack is coming out rapidly. One pilot sits level with or slightly below the tow plane and offset to one side believing that the imminent yawing between the tow plane and glider will dampen the loads sufficiently to prevent the rope from breaking. A second pilot has positioned himself slightly above the tow plane and offset enough that he can easily watch the towline and it's rate of tightening. As the line starts to come tight, this pilot points his nose toward the tow plane and lowers the nose, believing that he is in a good position and attitude for at least some of the tow line loads to be absorbed in accelerating the glider. The speed differential is diminished, as is the AOA of the glider. Which of these two pilots is least likely to break the rope? And do you have sound physics (rather than emotion) to support your position? M Eiler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
(PIREP, long) Cherokee 180 from Bay Area to Bishop, CA | Dave Jacobowitz | Piloting | 15 | June 24th 04 12:11 AM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |