![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it within FARs to do a 4-ship pass down the active at 500 ft msl at 160
mph at an uncontrolled airstrip? Bingo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bingo" wrote in message nk.net... Is it within FARs to do a 4-ship pass down the active at 500 ft msl at 160 mph at an uncontrolled airstrip? Bingo Used to be fine, but who knows now-a-days... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
"Bingo" wrote: Is it within FARs to do a 4-ship pass down the active at 500 ft msl at 160 mph at an uncontrolled airstrip? Bingo Yes -- as long as all members of the flight have agreed to the flight. The pass down the runway is usually in echelon, followed by the break to downwind and landing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like the hotshots at 7S5 are still trying to show everyone how
'swell' they can fly. Were there any airplanes with no radios in the pattern? Any student pilots in the pattern? Any citizens in town, less than a mile away, and in-line with the runway? The FARs say that whether in formation or not, thou shalt not be less than 1000' above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2000' of the aircraft. FAR Part 91.119 (b), "Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft." This would include the homes in the airpark, as well as non-aviation homes within a quarter mile of the runway, wouldn't it? 160 mph at 320' agl? WOW! They sure must be good pilots! Bango "Bingo" wrote in message nk.net... Is it within FARs to do a 4-ship pass down the active at 500 ft msl at 160 mph at an uncontrolled airstrip? Bingo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:33:06 -0700, "Ron" no one @home.com wrote:
The FARs say that whether in formation or not, thou shalt not be less than 1000' above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2000' of the aircraft. If that's the part that's bothering you, then the fact that they are in formation is moot. It's no more legal...or illegal...to do it as part of a formation than it is to do solo. Fly a low pass over a runway with no intention of landing? Heck, I've done it. Bet I ain't the only one.... Ron Wanttaja |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron Wanttaja says...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:33:06 -0700, "Ron" no one @home.com wrote: Fly a low pass over a runway with no intention of landing? Heck, I've done it. Bet I ain't the only one.... Well Ron I must confess to doing what we call "gear checks" around here .I've also done deer checks ,duck checks,runway checks (looking for sink holes), people checks, personal checks, ramp checks ,bounced checks,Czech checks, rubber checks (hmmmm),past checks and checkered past checks.... Chuck(el Pollo Loco aks Head Ducks in a row checker)S |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() snip Well Ron I must confess to doing what we call "gear checks" around here .I've also done deer checks ,duck checks,runway checks (looking for sink holes), people checks, personal checks, ramp checks ,bounced checks,Czech checks, rubber checks (hmmmm),past checks and checkered past checks.... Chuck(el Pollo Loco aks Head Ducks in a row checker)S Check, Chuck, gotcha. No check ride? Ever ridden a Czech? If so, have you told your wife? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , B2431 says...
snip Well Ron I must confess to doing what we call "gear checks" around here .I've also done deer checks ,duck checks,runway checks (looking for sink holes), people checks, personal checks, ramp checks ,bounced checks,Czech checks, rubber checks (hmmmm),past checks and checkered past checks.... Chuck(el Pollo Loco aks Head Ducks in a row checker)S Check, Chuck, gotcha. No check ride? Ever ridden a Czech? If so, have you told your wife? Hmmm how did I forget Check ride?? Any Czech riding was before we were married. When I was single I had lots of Carnival knowledge with Czechs,Poles,Germans.Mountain Williams etc...I was an equal opportunity checker LOL!!! See ya Chuck (check out line checker) S RAH-14/1 ret |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Czech's don't take checks,,,,,,, hehehe
scrappman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:33:06 -0700, "Ron" no one @home.com wrote: The FARs say that whether in formation or not, thou shalt not be less than 1000' above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2000' of the aircraft. If that's the part that's bothering you, then the fact that they are in formation is moot. It's no more legal...or illegal...to do it as part of a formation than it is to do solo. Fly a low pass over a runway with no intention of landing? Heck, I've done it. Bet I ain't the only one.... Ron Wanttaja Well, I always intended to land, but thought I saw something on the runway... :-) Matt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Flying Wing Design workshop in july 04 | mat Redsell | Home Built | 1 | May 5th 04 01:53 PM |
Petition for keeping one Concorde flying | Paul Sengupta | Home Built | 95 | February 17th 04 06:38 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | Home Built | 0 | December 12th 03 12:01 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | Aerobatics | 0 | December 12th 03 12:00 AM |