![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As an active jumper, jumpmaster, jump instructor, competitor, master
rigger, skydiver driver and drop zone employee at various times over the last 30 years I can tell you that this was a tragic accident. For one thing I have never seen a pilot spin a cessna 10,000 ft down and pull out on downwind. Ever. I doubt it is even survivable in a Cessna. I HAVE done as Stuart tells, a tight spiral that rolls out on downwind to final that will beat a jumper to the ground. Every jump pilot typically does a deadstick landing from the exit point to the ground. Why? Time is money, ya gotta get the next load up. A jumper will typically spend 30 sec to 1 minute in freefall and then spend 3 to 5 minutes under canopy, depending on his exit and pull altitudes. I have also made many jumps at the Deland airport in the past. As I remember it is about 2 miles to town, and presumably the hospital. Deland has a big operation there. They have many jumpers going all the time. In general gliders and jumpers like to approach any airport from upwind, they drift into the field with the wind that way. That puts jumpers on "approach" where we think of it as downwind or upwind near pattern altitude. They turn and face the wind for an upwind landing during the last few hundred feet of descent. Many times the jump pilots, jumpers and local gliders are jockying in the same piece of the pattern. Vigilence is required. This was a case of two people meeting by accident, not by someone doing something erratic or out of the ordinary. Uninformed and halfcocked statements and speculation about jumpers are as big a disservice to them as the uninformed and halfcocked statements about pilots that get us mad. Justaguy |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No as I recall it read to 6,000 but I remember winding the thing up past the
6 more than once. -- Kathy Fields Experimental Helo magazine P. O. Box 1585 Inyokern, CA 93527 (760) 377-4478 (760) 408-9747 general and layout cell (760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell www.vkss.com www.experimentalhelo.com "Rich Ahrens" wrote in message ... Stuart Fields wrote: As a past sky diver driver, I used to dump them at 7200 out of a Cessna 182, and touch down the same time they did. The process I used was to first close the cowl flaps, close the throttle to 15" of mp.and roll into a steep bank. I didn't spin but I did have a tight spiral and typically saw the VSI go to numbers like 8,000fpm. You had a VSI in a 182 that read up to 8000? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Springer" wrote in message ... videoguy wrote: OK, lets explain this a little more to this non pilot and non jumper. Seems to me that logic dictates that if the divers are all trying to land at the airport, why would the jump plane try to get there around that same time? How long does it take for the divers to reach ground? 2 minutes? 4 minutes? Surely not much more than that. Why would the plane not descend at a pace to place them in the pattern after the jumpers had cleared the area? Does the 3-5 minutes flying time the plane saves by trying to beat the jumpers seem significant? I would appreciate any responders remembering that I am not a pilot, nor a jumper. Answers with some supporting details would be appreciated. Thanks, GWK Hmmmm.... video guy, looking for some gory details? I don't know you, Mr. Springer, and as far as I know, you don't know me either. But, as this is the second time you have responded to one of my posts with comments that are neither constructive or useful, but simply criptic, snide and rude, I will consider you to be someone who has little of value to add to any discussion. I fail to see where any of my post indicates even the remotest interest in gory details. As someone who was unfamiliar with the sport of skydiving, I asked what I considered to be valid questions. Mr. Springer, or whatever your name really is, there is no need for you to respond. I have decided to give your posts the consideration they deserve. Regards, GWK |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... [Very informative reply snipped] Thanks for the explanation. I didn't have any knowledge regarding skydiving operations. Your desciption made things much easier to understand. Think I'll try to locate a group in my area and go watch them some weekend. Sounds like one could learn quite a bit by just being there. GWK |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "videoguy" wrote I fail to see where any of my post indicates even the remotest interest in gory details. As someone who was unfamiliar with the sport of skydiving, I asked what I considered to be valid questions. I'm with you, on this one. Springer flew off the handle, with no good reason. In answer to your question, the big skydiving venues have more jumpers waiting on the ground, to get a ride up. The sooner the jump plane is on the ground, the sooner he can get loaded, and up again. Time is money, so they rush as quickly as possible. The skydivers and the landing plane are not supposed to be in the same area. My guess is that wind conditions were different than expected, and the skydiver got in the wrong place, and perhaps the plane was in the wrong place, also. Time will tell, as the investigations take place. Some planes, have turboprop engines, that are very powerful, and can climb to altitude quickly with a heavy load. Right plane, for the job. Some of them also have a feature called beta thrust, which allows the pilot to reverse the propeller, so it pushes, or tries to push, the plane backwards. This allows the plane to point almost straight down, select beta (reverse), and keep the plane from exceeding the top allowable speed for the airplane. Many planes with beta are not allowed to do this while flying, and only do this after landing to slow the plane more quickly, or parking. -- Jim in NC |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"videoguy" wrote I fail to see where any of my post indicates even the remotest interest in gory details. As someone who was unfamiliar with the sport of skydiving, I asked what I considered to be valid questions. I'm with you, on this one. Springer flew off the handle, with no good reason. In answer to your question, the big skydiving venues have more jumpers waiting on the ground, to get a ride up. The sooner the jump plane is on the ground, the sooner he can get loaded, and up again. Time is money, so they rush as quickly as possible. The skydivers and the landing plane are not supposed to be in the same area. My guess is that wind conditions were different than expected, and the skydiver got in the wrong place, and perhaps the plane was in the wrong place, also. Time will tell, as the investigations take place. Some planes, have turboprop engines, that are very powerful, and can climb to altitude quickly with a heavy load. Right plane, for the job. Some of them also have a feature called beta thrust, which allows the pilot to reverse the propeller, so it pushes, or tries to push, the plane backwards. This allows the plane to point almost straight down, select beta (reverse), and keep the plane from exceeding the top allowable speed for the airplane. Many planes with beta are not allowed to do this while flying, and only do this after landing to slow the plane more quickly, or parking. Apparently Morgan you have not been around when guys with names like video guy post in this newsgroup asking for videos of of airplane crashes and all of the details so they can make videos for profit. This has happened in this newsgroup on several occasions. If Video guy is not that person or a person like that then I apologize. IMO it is not funny when people go phishing for gory videos and details of peoples misfortunes to make money. Jerry |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMO it is not funny
when people go phishing for gory videos and details of peoples misfortunes to make money. Jerry While I agree with your statement, I find it a little ironic considering the name you post under. ![]() BTW, it that's your real name, I apologize for my comment. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Springer" wrote \ Apparently Morgan you have not been around when guys with names like video guy post in this newsgroup asking for videos of of airplane crashes and all of the details so they can make videos for profit. This has happened in this newsgroup on several occasions. If Video guy is not that person or a person like that then I apologize. IMO it is not funny when people go phishing for gory videos and details of peoples misfortunes to make money. I've been around for several years now, and I also despise the crash mongers. I have not seen any of this type of behavior from video guy, and did not read any of that type of behavior in this line of questions. An understandable sensitivity, but in this case I think (and hope) it is not warranted. -- Jim in NC |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LCT Paintball wrote:
IMO it is not funny when people go phishing for gory videos and details of peoples misfortunes to make money. Jerry While I agree with your statement, I find it a little ironic considering the name you post under. ![]() BTW, it that's your real name, I apologize for my comment. My real name:-) I just wish I made the money the TV Jerry Springer Makes. I would hate to have such a stupid TV show though. Jerry (the real) Springer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need Gear Legs for '59 Cessna 150 | Burt Compton | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 22nd 04 03:03 PM |
Cessna landing gear legs Reserve MET! | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 07:50 PM |
Cessna landing gear legs Reserve MET! | Bill Berle | Restoration | 0 | February 22nd 04 07:50 PM |
Wanted: Gear Legs 1959 C-150 | Burt Compton | Home Built | 0 | December 29th 03 04:32 PM |
Wanted: Gear Legs C-150 (1959) | Burt Compton | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 29th 03 04:18 PM |