![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
recall one similar to what you've described Warren, where somebody (some
stupid maintenance guy) ejected into the hangar overhead. Is this the one where the retracted basketball net kept him from falling back to the deck? CV45, off coast of Korea. F9F. I was there but did not see it. Warren |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nils Rostedt wrote...
Speaking of gliders, I wonder if any gliders have an arrangement whereby both ailerons can be moved in unison to a really high negative (up) angle, in effect acting as spoilers or speedbrakes... What you describe sounds like "crow" mixing, where the flaps go down and the ailerons (both) reflex up. It's still used in RC gliders, and given that there are several powered airplanes that use it or something similar I'd bet that there are full-size gliders that use it as well. There's also trailing edge reflex, where flaps and ailerons all move *slightly* trailing edge up, but not a lot, and that's for drag reduction in cruise, not drag increase for approach. Some full-size gliders use this as well. Dave 'poor man's DLC' Hyde |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Hyde" wrote in message ... Nils Rostedt wrote... Speaking of gliders, I wonder if any gliders have an arrangement whereby both ailerons can be moved in unison to a really high negative (up) angle, in effect acting as spoilers or speedbrakes... What you describe sounds like "crow" mixing, where the flaps go down and the ailerons (both) reflex up. It's still used in RC gliders, and given that there are several powered airplanes that use it or something similar I'd bet that there are full-size gliders that use it as well. There's also trailing edge reflex, where flaps and ailerons all move *slightly* trailing edge up, but not a lot, and that's for drag reduction in cruise, not drag increase for approach. Some full-size gliders use this as well. Dave 'poor man's DLC' Hyde The most successful high-drag device is a Shempp-Hirth trailing edge dive brake. The half span flaps go to 80 degrees down and a surface of equal span and width rotates up from the upper wing surface on the same hinge line as the flaps. This results in a surface twice the chord of the flaps at right angles to the airflow. The effect is dramatic. Several pilots have had police meet them on the ground after landing to investigate the 'crash'. The view from the cockpit is scary at first. The nose is so far down that it looks like a 'lawn dart' maneuver. Precision spot landings are very easy when you get the hang of it. Just aim the nose at the touch down spot. If you see you are long, just push the nose further down - the airspeed won't increase. The flare has to be timed right but the feel is very slow and "floaty" with a soft touchdown and short roll. You get the feeling that you could land on a 'postage stamp'. Bill Daniels |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Daniels" wrote in message news:GILld.337003$wV.41042@attbi_s54... The most successful high-drag device is a Shempp-Hirth trailing edge dive brake. The half span flaps go to 80 degrees down and a surface of equal span and width rotates up from the upper wing surface on the same hinge line as the flaps. This results in a surface twice the chord of the flaps at right angles to the airflow. The effect is dramatic. Several pilots have had police meet them on the ground after landing to investigate the 'crash'. The view from the cockpit is scary at first. The nose is so far down that it looks like a 'lawn dart' maneuver. Precision spot landings are very easy when you get the hang of it. Just aim the nose at the touch down spot. If you see you are long, just push the nose further down - the airspeed won't increase. The flare has to be timed right but the feel is very slow and "floaty" with a soft touchdown and short roll. You get the feeling that you could land on a 'postage stamp'. Bill Daniels Though off the subject. The approach described above is similar to that experienced in sailplanes that depend solely on large span flaps. (SGS 1-35, PIK-20B and the Schreder HP/RS/RHJ series.) For example, a Schreder HP-14's 40:1 glide ratio is decreased to 2:1 when the flaps are lowered to 90 degrees. This gives an approach angle of 30 degrees which requires the nose to be 45 degrees below the horizon. It takes some getting use to; however, once mastered it makes short field landings "a piece of cake". See: http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP...NG_THE_14.html http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/St..._HP_flight.htm http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/Large-span_flaps.html (Other stories can be found at: http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/Sc...e_Stories.html) Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Paul wrote:
..... For example, a Schreder HP-14's 40:1 glide ratio is decreased to 2:1 when the flaps are lowered to 90 degrees. Wow! That's an amazing change. ...This gives an approach angle of 30 degrees which requires the nose to be 45 degrees below the horizon. I think you've got this a little backwards - if the approach angle is 30 degrees, the nose can't be BELOW that - you'd have a negative angle of attack. I think that the nose would be somewhere in the 20 degree down range, to provide a positive AOA of somewhere around 10 degrees. 20 degrees nose down is VERY down, however - it would certainly LOOK like you're pointing straight down..... -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote in message news:PiPld.610968$8_6.562540@attbi_s04... Wayne Paul wrote: ..... For example, a Schreder HP-14's 40:1 glide ratio is decreased to 2:1 when the flaps are lowered to 90 degrees. Wow! That's an amazing change. ...This gives an approach angle of 30 degrees which requires the nose to be 45 degrees below the horizon. I think you've got this a little backwards - if the approach angle is 30 degrees, the nose can't be BELOW that - you'd have a negative angle of attack. I think that the nose would be somewhere in the 20 degree down range, to provide a positive AOA of somewhere around 10 degrees. 20 degrees nose down is VERY down, however - it would certainly LOOK like you're pointing straight down..... The stall speed of a HP-14 with a 90 degree flap setting is only 30 mph. The approach is flown at 55 mph (the best L/D speed with 0 degree flap setting) to provide the ability to take of a little flap while raising the nose if you are tracking short of the desired touch down point. Lowering the flaps changes the effective angle of incidence of the wing with relationship to the fuselage. In the case of the HP-14 this is about 15 degrees. The attitude of the HP-14 sitting on the runway is the approximate attitude at which it stalls with a 90 degree flap setting. As you fly the approach at 55 with full flap you look landing aim point is well above the nose of the glider. In fact it is almost up to the canopy bow. (Pictures of HP-14 large span flaps: http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP...41/N8041_1.jpg more links http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/HP...-14_Links.html) Respectfully, Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article PiPld.610968$8_6.562540@attbi_s04,
"Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote: Wayne Paul wrote: ..... For example, a Schreder HP-14's 40:1 glide ratio is decreased to 2:1 when the flaps are lowered to 90 degrees. Wow! That's an amazing change. ...This gives an approach angle of 30 degrees which requires the nose to be 45 degrees below the horizon. I think you've got this a little backwards - if the approach angle is 30 degrees, the nose can't be BELOW that - you'd have a negative angle of attack. I think that the nose would be somewhere in the 20 degree down range, to provide a positive AOA of somewhere around 10 degrees. 20 degrees nose down is VERY down, however - it would certainly LOOK like you're pointing straight down..... You're forgetting the effect of lowering the flaps on the actual as opposed to nominal AOA of the wings. Ask yourself how much you'd have to lower the nose after lowering the flaps in order to (for instance) stay at the zero lift AOA relative to the fuselage... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|