![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote:
Why so fast, "90 mph"? What are the v speeds of this plane? I couldn't find them readily online. Looking at the photo it didn't appear the flaps were down at all. I'm thinking with flaps they could have gone slower down the runway and the pickup would have been able to keep up easier and they'd have more time on each attempt. Stall with full flaps is 60 mph. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote in news:%4_Be.1884$YD3.1605
@trndny03: Skywise wrote: Why so fast, "90 mph"? What are the v speeds of this plane? I couldn't find them readily online. Looking at the photo it didn't appear the flaps were down at all. I'm thinking with flaps they could have gone slower down the runway and the pickup would have been able to keep up easier and they'd have more time on each attempt. Stall with full flaps is 60 mph. Thanks all for the info, although my other question still stands. Is there any reason to NOT make this effort at a slower speed using flaps? The picture clearly shows the flaps up. Is the aircraft more controllable? Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote:
The picture clearly shows the flaps up. Is the aircraft more controllable? Both of my aircraft were more controllable with flaps up, especially in ground effect. You also need more power with flaps down; that and the effect of the flaps would make it a bit turbulent for the guys in the truck. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote in
news:WP9Ce.1399$xe3.213@trndny09: Skywise wrote: The picture clearly shows the flaps up. Is the aircraft more controllable? Both of my aircraft were more controllable with flaps up, especially in ground effect. You also need more power with flaps down; that and the effect of the flaps would make it a bit turbulent for the guys in the truck. Thank you, George. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In oups.com,
Jim slavered, and posted this: A&P heroics in landing gear save: http://www.mccookgazette.com/story/1109870.html -Jim Not for nothing (and not that I am not glad that all are OK), but after reading the article, I seriously question the pilot's decision to fly the airplane (and the mechanic's competence on the 210) with "an oil leak from the flaps and the gear." I can see the NTSB incident report: Probable Cause: Improper preflight and pilot's decision to fly with known hydraulic deficiencies in the landing gear system. Contributing Factor: Failure of the landing gear hydraulic system. By the way, I found this on AvWeb regarding landing gear on the C210 (http://www.avweb.com/news/maint/182907-1.html): quote The Centurion landing gear system has a lousy reputation. Actually, the gear system can be extremely reliable if you and your maintenance shop understands the system thoroughly. CPA's three-day Cessna 210 Systems and Procedures Course devotes several hours to this subject, but I will mention a few of the highlights here. UH OH! NO GREEN LIGHT. If you don't get a green light after extending the gear, the first thing to do is to visually check the landing gear position. When down and locked, the main gear tires can be seen from the cabin. However, the nosewheel is not visible to the pilot unless you install a convex landing gear mirror. A mirror is also necessary to observe the position of the main gear doors (if your plane has them). CPA sells an STC'd mirror that simply replaces one of the underwing inspection plates. If the landing gear appears completely down but there is no green light, a normal landing should be made. If the main gear is down but not quite locked, the weight of the aircraft will push the main gear legs toward the locked position. However, the nose gear retracts forward, so weight on an unlocked nose gear will tend to make it retract. Therefore, take care to hold the nose wheel off the ground as long as possible. If the gear does not appear to be fully extended, try to determine the cause. On 1971 and earlier 210s which use an engine-driven hydraulic pump, recycle the landing gear handle to the neutral position and then back to the down position. On 1972 and later 210s with an electrically-driven hydraulic pump, make sure that the landing gear switch is in the down position and that neither the landing gear motor circuit breaker or landing gear control circuit breaker have tripped. If the gear still is not fully extended, then it is time to use the emergency extension system. With the landing gear handle or switch in the down position, pull out the emergency extension pump handle and start pumping. Continue until the handle feels like it is set in cement. Visually determine that the gear is extended and that you have a green light, then make a normal landing. If the emergency extension handle won't budge, the most likely cause is a stuck door solenoid valve (assuming you have doors). The door solenoid valve is electrically activated to the door-closed position and spring- loaded to the door-open position. Try turning off the master switch (VFR conditions only!) to allow the electrical circuits in the landing gear system to cool down. This may allow the solenoid valve to drop into place. You can also try pulling the plastic center console cover off to expose the landing gear power pack, and rap on the door solenoid valve to encourage it to release. The door solenoid valve is the small silver canister assembly on the left side of the power pack. If the emergency extension handle moves freely but the gear does not extend, the most likely cause is insufficent hydraulic fluid. On pre-1972 aircraft, there's not much you can do other than verifying that this is the situation by observing if any fluid is visible through the sight glass. On 1972 and later models, there's a dipstick and filler port behind a removable panel on the center console. If the dipstick shows no fluid in the power pack, you can try pouring any available liquid into the power pack reservoir. IF NOTHING WORKS, KEEP YOUR COOL. If a gear-up landing can't be avoided, the important thing is not to panic. A landing with the gear up or partially extended is not a life-threatening situation and only through panic can a pilot turn it into one. Simply make a normal approach, touching down at as low an airspeed as you are comfortable with while maintaining control of the aircraft. If you are faced with making a wheels-up landing, here are some items you might want to keep in mind: a.. Pavement is better than grass. Contrary to intuition, less damage will be done touch down on smooth pavement than on grass. b.. Pick a runway the airlines don't need. If you disturb airline schedules, the airport management will want toclear the runway quickly, which could result in greater damage to your aircraft. The FAA may get upset, too. If the wind is manageable, consider using a crosswind runway at an airport you think you might have repairs done. c.. Don't worry about prop or engine damage. The hangar flyers will tell you should shut down the engine and stop the prop on final to minimize damage. Most of those guys have never done it. I have, and let me tell you it is no easy task. Once you pull the mixture out to shut down the engine, you will have to reduce airspeed almost to stall to get the prop stopped, and then remain at very low airspeed to prevent the prop from windmilling again. What's the point? At best, you'll only be saving money for your insurance company. And that's a pretty poor reason for increasing the risk factor during a wheels up landing /quote The news article doesn't say anything about whether these procedures were attempted... -- Doug Semler http://home.wideopenwest.com/~doug_semler a.a. #705, BAAWA. EAC Guardian of the Horn of the IPU (pbuhh). I hate spam, standard email address munging applied. Displaced Bolts fan in Detroit ![]() 42 DNRC o- Gur Hfrarg unf orpbzr fb shyy bs penc gurfr qnlf, uneqyl nalbar rira erpbtavmrf fvzcyr guvatf yvxr ebg13 nalzber. Fnq, vfa'g vg? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|