![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Weaver" said:
Paul Tomblin wrote: the ones you talk to (you say "St. Catherines Radio" instead of "St. Catherines Traffic" or they get upset with you), but they tell you the ... I always say "St. Catharines Radio" and have never had anyone get upset. Which is exactly what I said. so they know that I am a local, but you are probably pronouncing St. Catharines the way you spell it so they know that you are not from around the area. Your condescention is misplaced. Next time, try reading what I actually wrote. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "It is a universal truth that the loss of liberty will be charged to dangers, real or imagined, from abroad." - James Madison |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
... Which is exactly what I said. ... Right, I misread what you wrote and forgot to add the ![]() Sorry. -- Peter Weaver Weaver Consulting Services Inc. Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAX www.weaverconsulting.ca |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I'll bite...
How *do* you say "St. Catharine's"? Les "Peter Weaver" wrote in message ... Paul Tomblin wrote: ... Which is exactly what I said. ... Right, I misread what you wrote and forgot to add the ![]() Sorry. -- Peter Weaver Weaver Consulting Services Inc. Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAX www.weaverconsulting.ca |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Weaver"
Paul Tomblin wrote: the ones you talk to (you say "St. Catherines Radio" instead of "St. Catherines Traffic" or they get upset with you), but they tell you the ... I always say "St. Catharines Radio" and have never had anyone get upset. Is there a St. Catherines FSS or FIC? moo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
... Is there a St. Catharines FSS or FIC? ... AFAIK it is a FSS. -- Peter Weaver Weaver Consulting Services Inc. Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAX www.weaverconsulting.ca |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cub Driver" wrote in message
Last week I was in Greenland, at Narsarsuaq, formerly the USAAF and USAF airfield Bluie West One. It's a fabulous place, but one aspect of the Narsarsuaq airfield really astonished me. There is a tower, six days a week during normal daylight hours, but the tower only gives advice; the pilot is always in control, and makes his own decisions. Is this very unusual? Unicom. Just a guy giving friendly advice. There are some private airports which have towers that can give or deny permission to land at the pilot's discretion. Downsview airport in Toronto (Bombardier facility and military base) has a tower (in the physical sense) with an operator that replies "cleared to land at your discretion" if you're welcome. But it isn't a clearance in the ATC sense of the word. moo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
(Bombardier facility and military base) has a tower (in the physical sense) with an operator that replies "cleared to land at your discretion" This is a contradiction in itself. This operator musn't give any clearances and hence musn't use the "cleared". It is very important to understand this. Stefan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stefan"
(Bombardier facility and military base) has a tower (in the physical sense) with an operator that replies "cleared to land at your discretion" This is a contradiction in itself. This operator musn't give any clearances and hence musn't use the "cleared". It is very important to understand this. The "operator" can't give the kind of "clearance" ATC gives. But they can grant permission to land and I don't know of any regulation that makes it illegal for them to use the word "cleared" when doing so. I've never heard them say "cleared" without following it with "at your discretion". They're talking to pilots who are required to know that a Unicom is not an ATC facility. And sometimes they can give or refuse permission to land (private facility) and sometimes they can't (public one). moo |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
The "operator" can't give the kind of "clearance" ATC gives. But they can grant permission to land and I don't know of any regulation that makes it illegal for them to use the word "cleared" when doing so. I've never heard them say "cleared" without following it with "at your discretion". In ICAO terminology, the word "cleared" is reserved for ATC clearances and it is most confusing and dangerous if the term is used carelessly by other persons. At uncontrolled fields, AFIS just says "land at your discretion" or simply "welcome", but without any clearance. And sometimes they can give or refuse permission to land (private facility) and sometimes they can't (public one). Of course, they can always refuse the premission to land (except on emergencies, of course). In this case, they simply say "you're not allowed to land". Stefan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stefan"
The "operator" can't give the kind of "clearance" ATC gives. But they can grant permission to land and I don't know of any regulation that makes it illegal for them to use the word "cleared" when doing so. I've never heard them say "cleared" without following it with "at your discretion". In ICAO terminology, the word "cleared" is reserved for ATC clearances and it is most confusing and dangerous if the term is used carelessly by other persons. At uncontrolled fields, AFIS just says "land at your discretion" or simply "welcome", but without any clearance. They shouldn't use the word "cleared". But they can and do.It doesn't confuse me. Would anyone here really find it confusing? And sometimes they can give or refuse permission to land (private facility) and sometimes they can't (public one). Of course, they can always refuse the premission to land (except on emergencies, of course). In this case, they simply say "you're not allowed to land". Not at a public facility. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
Georgetown, TX - MIDAIR Collision | Nasir | Piloting | 49 | May 19th 04 02:36 AM |
Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control | cefarthing | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 30th 03 04:53 PM |