![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If memory serves me right (after living in the US for 18 years now),
this scheme is a time honored tradition in Germany as well as in the US. Just try and put a product on the market that rhymes with WalMart or Sony and wait what happens. This is just another form of ambulance chasing that lawyers initiate to make a quick buck. I would not be surprised if Zink had turned over this entire business of fighting unauthorized usage of his pictures to lawyer that can't hack it in business law or other more mainstream councel activities. He may even have signed away his right to interfere with the enforcement process once the lawyer determined that money might be extracted. A more benign point: Just because Zink doesn't speak English he should not be considered a mindless redneck by this international and no doubt multilingual forum. Herb wrote: This is one very nasty situation. Mr. Zink should not hire any lawyers, if he is so pathetic about his "rights" ...well, he can keep his calendars for himself. Hopefully nobody will buy his "art". I don't think we need people like him involved with anything related to soaring or aviation in general. I really feel sorry for the victims of his "business practice". Sounds to me like "sovietizing"...I wonder, maybe Mr. Zink is behind Russia cutting natural gas supply to Europe? Just a thought.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a better idea, instead of collecting money through paypal to
DEFEND the case, why not just take a collection to PAY the 1400 Euro's and be done with the whole problem. Seems like he is only asking to reimburse the legal fees and not even charging for use of the picture.....a fair deal indeed! If everyone sent a couple euros it will all go away in very short order. Just let him know what you are doing and ask for a bit of time to raise the money. There is absolutely NO reason to boycott his business since he has done no wrong at all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jb92563 wrote:
I had a better idea, instead of collecting money through paypal to DEFEND the case, why not just take a collection to PAY the 1400 Euro's and be done with the whole problem. Seems like he is only asking to reimburse the legal fees and not even charging for use of the picture.....a fair deal indeed! A very interesting position to take -- something very much in line with Zink's own approach of trying to get something for nothing, no matter from whom it comes. Nothing posted here so far on the matter has shown Zink's case to be built on anything but arrogance, greed, and bluster. Any money contributed should go only to putting Herr Zink in his place. "Fair" would be Zink learning to communicate constructively with someone other than his lawyer. I notice he has not the courage to come here and plead his own case, but finds others to do it for him. Perhaps he is waiting for someone to make a gift to him of a keyboard. Jack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am wondering why the fraudulent representative for Mr. Zink isn't more the
focus of this group???? Both by the group and Mr. Zink! He strikes me as being the one who should be paying. Alpha |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jb92563 wrote: why not just take a collection to PAY the 1400 Euro's and be done with the whole problem. This sounds like caving in to extortion. I don't need a calendar...so I'm not boycotting...I'm just not buying! This is bad press, for both sides. My images have been pilfered, too, but since I don't rely on that to make my living, I suffer no "damages." Good luck to the Lolanders...I guess I'm just cheering for the little guys (and habitually jeering the lawyers). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
New update.
We tried to settle this with cdz in a friendly way. Didn't work. We are now facing a higher threat and going to court. Where will this lead to? Going to prison? When you have a calendar of cdz, and look at the nice foto's, remember that behind the photo is someone that seems only interested in money and rather bring us to court than try to find a solution. Any help in this case would be welcome. If you know CDZ please talk to him and try to convince him that this is not what he wants. For details and all correspondence with cdz etc. see: http://lowlands.sytes.net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IANAL (I am not a lawyer) but...
.... I think the injunction the lawyer is threatening you with, will not be enforcable since you already changed the picture on your website. As far as I know, "einstweilige Verfügungen" (injunctions) are used to set an immediate but temporary stop to an activity. I can't see how this is applicable in your case. .... I believe that only commercial sites need to have an impressum. I am bot even sure if this is European law, in my mind this is just a German thing. .... I do not believe that the LLC team is constituting a GbR (manily due to its non-commercial mission). This link seems to support that: http://www.frankfurt-main.ihk.de/eng...t-up/idem/gbr/ Anyhow, how can German law can be used to prosecute an Internet activity is beyond my understanding, but a sad fact nevertheless... .... CDZ's case seems to be weakened since the picture in question was indeed freely available on his site. However, you unknowingly violated the license agreement by not stating the copyright on the LLC site. My advise would be to get a German lawyer. The Glider community is a large on, there clearly should be a kind fellow among the lawyer faction who can help out..? ....... As a sideliner, I am very troubled to say that I unfortunately already ordered and received this year's "Fotokalender Segelflug"... As a redemption I will transfer the same amount of money to your PayPal account. The tone in CDZ's letters is irritatingly arrogant. This man clearly has to be made aware of certain courtesy standards and limits. I wish you all the best for your case! Reno _____________ Ronald Termaat wrote: New update. We tried to settle this with cdz in a friendly way. Didn't work. We are now facing a higher threat and going to court. Where will this lead to? Going to prison? (...) For details and all correspondence with cdz etc. see: http://lowlands.sytes.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi again,
yesterday evening I had a brief mail discussion with CDZ on that topic. I don't know... he seems to be one of the "old Germans" who thinks that the whole world would better speak their language... :-( I explained the situation in detail to him - in German - and he actually agreed that probably this conflict could have been avoided if Vertigos first mails would have been in German. Since he does not speak English, he throws away all non-German mails as spam. =:-o Well, to me he seems to be a bitter man, his mails were full of suppressed rage. I don't know if he always is like this, if he has far too many copyright cases to deal with, or if he is annoyed over the mails and telephone calls he gets on this current issue. Anyway, our little chat did not change anything, he still blames the LLC team for everything and he wants to see money. It was worth the try, though... /Reno Knacklappen wrote: IANAL (I am not a lawyer) but... (...) I wish you all the best for your case! Reno _____________ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:35:17 UTC, "Ronald Termaat"
wrote: : We tried to settle this with cdz in a friendly way. Didn't work. We are : now facing a higher threat and going to court. Am I right in thinking that you attempted to make contact with this man, and that your email to him was replied to by someone claiming to be writing on his behalf and giving you permission to do what you did? If that reply can be proved to have been made to an email you sent Zink, I'd have thought that would make a pretty strong case. Ian -- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He may have done no wrong but do you really want to
give money to someone who behaves as he has. If enough people e-mail him to say that they are not buying his calendar because of this it would probably go away fairly quickly. Call me old fashioned but I don't have to buy things from...........anyone. At 22:30 30 December 2005, Jb92563 wrote: I had a better idea, instead of collecting money through paypal to DEFEND the case, why not just take a collection to PAY the 1400 Euro's and be done with the whole problem. Seems like he is only asking to reimburse the legal fees and not even charging for use of the picture.....a fair deal indeed! If everyone sent a couple euros it will all go away in very short order. Just let him know what you are doing and ask for a bit of time to raise the money. There is absolutely NO reason to boycott his business since he has done no wrong at all. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|