A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Columbia crash...opinions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 30th 06, 03:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

Look again, front seat passenger (adult), back seat passenger (adult male)
and I'm guessing that a litter with a medical patient behind the pilot, look
at the oxygen support and other medical supplies.

He was obviously heavy and not enough power available.
BT

"Kobra" wrote in message
...
Check this clip out. What does everyone think happened here?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2XJYgcJU

It looks like a 182, so it had *some* muscle.

I think it must have been hot, maybe a high elevation, loaded with fuel,
people and equipment. But one passenger was a small boy so he couldn't
have been very heavy.

It also looks like a soft-field technique that was poorly executed and he
lost directional control and didn't lower the nose to build airspeed
first.

Very sad,

Kobra



  #2  
Old March 30th 06, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

("BTIZ" wrote)
Look again, front seat passenger (adult), back seat passenger (adult male)
and I'm guessing that a litter with a medical patient behind the pilot,
look at the oxygen support and other medical supplies.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2XJYgcJU

Is that the same (crash) plane or a second plane?

When I saw the post-crash fire and smoke, and the people on the ground being
treated, I figured the crash plane was toast.


Montblack



  #3  
Old March 30th 06, 01:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2XJYgcJU

Is that the same (crash) plane or a second plane?

When I saw the post-crash fire and smoke, and the people on the ground
being treated, I figured the crash plane was toast.


It's the same plane. The footage is in chronological order.

--Gary


  #4  
Old March 30th 06, 03:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

("Gary Drescher" wrote)
It's the same plane. The footage is in chronological order.



What was the distraught FRONT seat passenger saying - through her tears? She
did not appear happy.

Was she an injured passenger, too - before the crash?


Montblack

  #5  
Old March 30th 06, 04:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colombia crash...opinions

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("Gary Drescher" wrote)
It's the same plane. The footage is in chronological order.


What was the distraught FRONT seat passenger saying - through her tears?
She did not appear happy.


I don't know Spanish, so I can't tell. Perhaps she's crying because her son
is ill, or because she's afraid of small planes.

Was she an injured passenger, too - before the crash?


No injury is apparent. (According to the accompanying text, the passengers
all died in the crash, and the pilot was critically burned.)

--Gary


  #6  
Old March 30th 06, 04:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions


"Kobra" wrote in message
...
Check this clip out. What does everyone think happened here?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2XJYgcJU

It looks like a 182, so it had *some* muscle.

I think it must have been hot, maybe a high elevation, loaded with fuel,
people and equipment. But one passenger was a small boy so he couldn't
have been very heavy.

It also looks like a soft-field technique that was poorly executed and he
lost directional control and didn't lower the nose to build airspeed
first.

Very sad,

Kobra

Looks to me like maybe an aft C.G. condition....
It appears the pilot never had control of the airplane.

Frank


  #7  
Old March 30th 06, 04:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

Probably a couple a factors going on here...but impossible to tell just from
a video.

1. Weight
2. CG problem..probably aft...which would make rudder potentially worthless
3. High altitude and hot.....
4. Grass strip....lengthening takeoff roll.

My guess is the plane was probably over weight with a rearward CG. This
would explain the nose up attitude and yawing of the aircraft. In addition,
I don't think he lost dirrectional control...he never had it.

Perhaps he is always used to rotating at 60 kts. Throw in the above factors
and not only will the plane not fly....but it will be difficult to control.
His needed rotating speed adjust for weight, altitude, temp, winds, may have
been much higher....grass strip wouldn't help matters either.

JMHO

One last thing....as soon as the plane lifts off the ground the right wing
dips...this would tell me that for whatever reason he had insufficient
airspeed to make the wing generate lift.

"Kobra" wrote in message
...
Check this clip out. What does everyone think happened here?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2XJYgcJU

It looks like a 182, so it had *some* muscle.

I think it must have been hot, maybe a high elevation, loaded with fuel,
people and equipment. But one passenger was a small boy so he couldn't
have been very heavy.

It also looks like a soft-field technique that was poorly executed and he
lost directional control and didn't lower the nose to build airspeed
first.

Very sad,

Kobra



  #8  
Old March 30th 06, 01:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions


CG problem..probably aft...which would
make rudder potentially worthless.


Why? An aft CG will reduce the rudder's arm and increase the p-factor,
but it won't render it useless.

  #9  
Old March 30th 06, 07:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions

I"m not sure if I think this is really a weight issue. Yes, he may have
been over weight, but a C-182 (with a strong engine) will physically
take off and fly well over gross. Maybe he had too little runway and
tried to pull it into the air too soon? Again, the prop seemed to be
turning slow in the video, but I'm not a video expert and not familiar
with all the effects of the sample rate of the camera.

-Robert, CFI

  #10  
Old March 30th 06, 09:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Columbia crash...opinions


Again, the prop seemed to be
turning slow in the video, but I'm not a video expert and not familiar
with all the effects of the sample rate of the camera.


I wonder if the audio track would give the engine RPM once averaged for
approaching and departing the camera location?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Q: How to find info about small plane crash in Columbia (South America)? bud Piloting 5 December 28th 05 04:09 PM
Doubts raised in jet crash Dave Butler Piloting 8 July 26th 05 01:25 AM
Yet another A36 crash H.P. Piloting 10 April 23rd 05 05:58 PM
Cause of Columbia Shuttle Disaster. Mike Spera Owning 2 August 31st 03 03:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.