A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Civil Aviation question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 10th 06, 06:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:43:38 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in
et::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

Not yet. But given the Patriot Act and other constitutional breaches
that reveal the direction the current administration is moving, it
shouldn't be to much longer ...


You make it sound like we had constitutional government prior to the current
administration or passage of the Patriot Act.


That was not my intent.

It is just the acceleration of unconstitutional acts perpetrated by
the current administration that makes it blatantly obvious.

  #22  
Old May 10th 06, 06:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

Which unconstitutional acts?




"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
| On Wed, 10 May 2006 16:43:38 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
| wrote in
| et::
|
|
| "Larry Dighera" wrote in message
| .. .
|
| Not yet. But given the Patriot Act and other
constitutional breaches
| that reveal the direction the current administration is
moving, it
| shouldn't be to much longer ...
|
|
| You make it sound like we had constitutional government
prior to the current
| administration or passage of the Patriot Act.
|
|
| That was not my intent.
|
| It is just the acceleration of unconstitutional acts
perpetrated by
| the current administration that makes it blatantly
obvious.
|


  #23  
Old May 10th 06, 06:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

On Wed, 10 May 2006 11:46:39 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in
::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

Because corporations are not citizens, they should be permitted no
influence in government policy.


By this logic then organizations such as the AOPA, AARP, NRA and PTA should
have no influence?


While those groups certainly are corporations, they do represent their
members (hundreds of thousands of citizens) unlike Halliburton, Enron,
Exxon, Accuweather, Carlyle Group, ..., that exert more legislative
influence than the lawmakers' own constituents.

Big business only represents greed, and their unethical
(Abramoffesque) corruption of legislators must be stopped.

  #24  
Old May 10th 06, 07:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 May 2006 11:46:39 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in
::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
. ..

Because corporations are not citizens, they should be permitted no
influence in government policy.


By this logic then organizations such as the AOPA, AARP, NRA and PTA
should
have no influence?


While those groups certainly are corporations, they do represent their
members (hundreds of thousands of citizens) unlike Halliburton, Enron,
Exxon, Accuweather, Carlyle Group, ..., that exert more legislative
influence than the lawmakers' own constituents.

Big business only represents greed, and their unethical
(Abramoffesque) corruption of legislators must be stopped.



So it's just companies that you don't agree with for one reason or another
that shouldn't have influence? I'll make sure when the reform laws are
passed we legislate that you get the final OK on who gets free speech.

The problem isn't the companies doing the influencing and not really the
politicians that allow themselves to be to be influenced. The problem is the
voters that keep reelecting the politicians.

Everybody thinks Congress as a whole sucks but love their own rep and/or
senator.


  #25  
Old May 10th 06, 09:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...
So it's just companies that you don't agree with for one reason or another
that shouldn't have influence? I'll make sure when the reform laws are
passed we legislate that you get the final OK on who gets free speech.

The problem isn't the companies doing the influencing and not really the
politicians that allow themselves to be to be influenced. The problem is
the voters that keep reelecting the politicians.

Everybody thinks Congress as a whole sucks but love their own rep and/or
senator.


Very well said...

Jay B


  #26  
Old May 10th 06, 09:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

Congress is powerful because of the tax laws. Business
can't plan ahead more than a 2 years because every election
brings new tax policies. Alter the tax code, perhaps H.R.
25 The Fair Tax Act, that will remove a lot of the day to
day special loopholes for one segment and also do away with
the IRS. Then taxes will be based on what you spend, not
what you earn. If Congressmen have less power they won't be
bribed as often because they would not be able to give
special favors.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...
|
| "Larry Dighera" wrote in message
| ...
| On Wed, 10 May 2006 11:46:39 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
| wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in
| ::
|
|
| "Larry Dighera" wrote in message
| . ..
|
| Because corporations are not citizens, they should be
permitted no
| influence in government policy.
|
|
| By this logic then organizations such as the AOPA, AARP,
NRA and PTA
| should
| have no influence?
|
|
| While those groups certainly are corporations, they do
represent their
| members (hundreds of thousands of citizens) unlike
Halliburton, Enron,
| Exxon, Accuweather, Carlyle Group, ..., that exert more
legislative
| influence than the lawmakers' own constituents.
|
| Big business only represents greed, and their unethical
| (Abramoffesque) corruption of legislators must be
stopped.
|
|
|
| So it's just companies that you don't agree with for one
reason or another
| that shouldn't have influence? I'll make sure when the
reform laws are
| passed we legislate that you get the final OK on who gets
free speech.
|
| The problem isn't the companies doing the influencing and
not really the
| politicians that allow themselves to be to be influenced.
The problem is the
| voters that keep reelecting the politicians.
|
| Everybody thinks Congress as a whole sucks but love their
own rep and/or
| senator.
|
|


  #27  
Old May 10th 06, 10:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:4ds8g.18330$ZW3.15406@dukeread04...
Congress is powerful because of the tax laws. Business
can't plan ahead more than a 2 years because every election
brings new tax policies. Alter the tax code, perhaps H.R.
25 The Fair Tax Act, that will remove a lot of the day to
day special loopholes for one segment and also do away with
the IRS. Then taxes will be based on what you spend, not
what you earn. If Congressmen have less power they won't be
bribed as often because they would not be able to give
special favors.



I have not a clue as to what the Fair Tax Act calls for or does. But keep in
mind that like all laws that Congress passes it can be changed by yet
another law Congress passes.

Remember the law on unfunded mandates. Big news when that fine law passed.
There was no news when the one ending passed and passed it must have because
unfunded mandates are back.



  #28  
Old May 10th 06, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...

Everybody thinks Congress as a whole sucks but love their own rep and/or
senator.


Not everybody. Both of my senators suck and my rep is only fair to
middlin'.


  #29  
Old May 10th 06, 11:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

In article ,
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote:

Everybody thinks Congress as a whole sucks but love their own rep and/or
senator.


Not everybody. Please take the taxachusetts senators and reps. blech.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #30  
Old May 10th 06, 11:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Civil Aviation question

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

While those groups certainly are corporations, they do represent their
members (hundreds of thousands of citizens) unlike Halliburton, Enron,
Exxon, Accuweather, Carlyle Group, ..., that exert more legislative
influence than the lawmakers' own constituents.



Huh ???? As a stock owner of some of those companies (through my 401k,
mutual finds and other investments that will help me retire one day) ...
yes ... those corporations that "I" own ....do represent me.

Sooooo many people forget who the corps are. They are owned by
millions of little old ladies' retirement savings. People just see the
CEO fat cats and think they are the owners. Bt the vast majority of
most public corporations are owned by everyday Americans who have their
savings in IRA's, credit unions, banks, 401ks , etc.

WE, THE PEOPLE ... ARE corporate America. And I'm proud of it.

Edward
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
aviation lingo question [email protected] Piloting 9 January 6th 06 02:06 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals Mergatroide General Aviation 1 January 13th 04 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.