![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Whiting wrote: Robert M. Gary wrote: I suspect the same is true of a golf ball (I'm a golfer, but not a terribly good one). I've watched a number of balls hit by amatuers and pros and I've never seen one rise above the launch trajectory. The backspin will certainly make the trajectory much flatter than a ballistic trajectory, but I don't think the ball will rise above a tangent line to the path leaving the club face. Golf balls clearly have lift and Cl is one of the criteria used when evaluating ball standards. Here is a pdf describing some of the formuals used and how the coefficient of lift for different balls effects flight. http://www.usga.org/equipment/techni...ublication.pdf "It has been shown (Bearman, Harvey, 1976) that the two aerodynamic coefficients, CD and CL, are related to the dimensionless Reynolds number (Re) and spin ratio (W)." Spin is one component that determins the lift produced by the ball. Here is an article from Cislunar Aerospace, Inc http://wings.avkids.com/Book/Sports/...d/golf-01.html "How a Golf Ball produces Lift Lift is another aerodynamic force which affects the flight of a golf ball. This idea might sound a little odd, but given the proper spin a golf ball can produce lift. At first, golfers thought all spin was detrimental (not good). However, in 1877, British scientist P.G. Tait learned that a ball, driven with a "backspin" (the top of the ball turning back toward the golfer) actually produces lift. The dimples also increase lift. Remember, dimples help keep the flow attached to the sphere. The dimples also cause the flow to be "focused" into the flow of the wake. In this figure, the smoke shows the flow pattern around a spinning golf ball. The flow is moving from left to right and the ball is spinning in a counter-clockwise direction. The wake is being forced downwards. This downward movement of the wake means that a lifting force is being applied to the golf ball. " -Robert |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter Duniho wrote:
"cjcampbell" wrote in message oups.com... That, and a positive angle of attack. The spin keeps it gyroscopically stable. As the forward motion decreases the Frisbee begins to settle, increasing the angle of attack until becomes a kind of parachute. True, but the increase in angle of attack is strictly a result of the change in relative wind. The frisbee remains in basically the same attitude throughout. It has no means of trimming for constant lift or anything like that. But not always. Throwing the Frisbee up will give it a positive angle of attack as it climbs. The vertical path is primarily a result of one throwing the frisbee in that direction. The path would curve down ballistically except for the basic 1G of lift that the relatively modest angle of attack, basically identical to the AOA in straight and level flight, provides. I don't quite fully understand what you are stating. Probably my English is not good enough. Do you think the lift (created by AOA and possibly bernulli-shaped foil) does create a significant amount of lift or not? You say that the (vertical) path is primarily a result of throwing, hence determined by ballistic effects. Yet you state 1G of lift. If the lift is in the order of magnitude of 1G, then it's certainly significant. Most airplanes create lift in that range.. That holds also with my experience, you don't need to give a frisbee much initial rate of climb (or any at all) to make it go a long way without loosing much altitude. Although I have never measured this :-) I even believe you can make it climb after releasing it with a horizontal trajectory. I think I have an explanation, why it doesn't work so well when throwing CDs: As has been stated, CDs will quickly turn sideways when released in an horizontal attitude. But a frisbee will do just the same, only slower! If we look at the frisbee (or CD) as an airfoil creating lift (whether newtonian or benoullian is not really important), the center of the aerodynamic force will alwas be forward of the middle line of the plane (as with all aircraft wings). With the cg in the middle of the disk, the aerodynamic force supporting it, will at the same time try to pitch it up! The gyroscopic force from the rotation translates this torque round the horizontal axis into one round the longitudinal axis, thus a rolling torque. In fact, when throwing a frisbee, at the point of release the disk should be slightly rolling in the opposite direction (and/or in a rolled attitude), to keep it roughly horizontal as long as possible. Only due to the much lower inertia this doesn't work as well with CDs, as the roll is so much faster! Once the forward motion stops the angle of attack can become negative, Negative. As in, not true. The frisbee still has positive angle of attack, and descends back along roughly the same path it took upward. It's a bit lazy-eight-ish and, as you know, you don't need negative lift to do those. As to the mechanics of making a frisbee return to the thrower, I don't understand the explanation given by CJ, especially the assumption of negative lift. However, it can not be explained purely by ballistics, unless it's thrown vertical. There needs to be some aerodynamic force towards the thrower beyond drag, drag stops the moment the forward motion stops. If, at the point of zero horizontal movement, the disk maintains it's attitude towards the horizon (that is, slightly pitched up in the direction of the original movement) it is now also pitched down in the direction towards the thrower. While moving towards terra firma, it will gain speed towards him, just like an aircraft will gain speed at the expense of altitude when pitched down. regards, Friedrich |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Friedrich Ostertag" wrote in message
... I don't quite fully understand what you are stating. Probably my English is not good enough. Probably. Nothing in my post states that the primary determinant for the path the frisbee takes is ballistics, and in fact I specifically point out that aerodynamic lift is what prevents a ballistic flight path. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
AES wrote:
Just got our dog a new frisbee (he goes thru 'em pretty fast if we're careless and leave them within reach after a session). This one has a large outer wire rim, small inner ring, and stretched radially between these 8 or 10 tapered spandex wedges (i.e., these wedges get wider as they go radially outward). There are gaps of comparable width between each of these blades, and each wedge is twisted by 180 degrees between inner and outer rings with most of the twist occurring close to the inner ring, so that these wedges give a reasonably convincing imitation of a multi-bladed propellor. This thing seems to fly just about as well, however, whether you fly it right side up or upside down, and whether you flip it to spin CW or CCW. (Hurts my left arm when I try to spin it CCW, however.) In other words, if there's any helicopter effect here, it's pretty weak. So, how does a frisbee fly, anyway? Another of his favorites is just a 10" diameter weighted outer rim filled in with a slightly saggy "cloth drumhead", which visibly bulges upward 1" or so at the center into a fair imitation of an airfoil when you throw it. I've always figured the heavy rim kept the thing spinning and thus semi-rigid, and the forward motion of the airfoil shape gave the lift. I'm not 100% sure and I'm not aerodynamicist, but I think two things help a frisbee fly, or any disk even one lacking an airfoil shape. 1. The gyroscopic stabilization provided by the spinning imparted when thrown. Just try to throw a frisbee or any disk without spinning it. It won't go anywhere. 2. A small AOA imparted also when thrown. This is the essential part and (1) above is really only important to the extent that it allows the angle of attack to be maintained during flight. Almost any object will create lift if it has some AOA. You can verify this by extending your hand out of the car window when driving, which most of us did as kids. If you rotate your hand from horizontal to say 30 degrees relative to the wind, you can create a fair bit of lift. And most of our hands aren't exactly an ideal airfoil. Matt |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Whiting wrote: Almost any object will create lift if it has some AOA. You can verify this by extending your hand out of the car window when driving, which most of us did as kids. If you rotate your hand from horizontal to say 30 degrees relative to the wind, you can create a fair bit of lift. And most of our hands aren't exactly an ideal airfoil. The magic question though is that B or N? I found as a kid (I guess I was bored) that curving my hand resulting in better "lift", which would seem to implicate B. -Robert |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert M. Gary wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: Almost any object will create lift if it has some AOA. You can verify this by extending your hand out of the car window when driving, which most of us did as kids. If you rotate your hand from horizontal to say 30 degrees relative to the wind, you can create a fair bit of lift. And most of our hands aren't exactly an ideal airfoil. The magic question though is that B or N? I found as a kid (I guess I was bored) that curving my hand resulting in better "lift", which would seem to implicate B. Neither, it is C. Matt |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
AES wrote:
So, how does a frisbee fly, anyway? Its all done with invisable strings! Rocky |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like someone figured it out. A frisbee produces lift by traveling
through the air just like an airplane wing. The spinning of the frisbee does nothing to increase the lift but it does produce the stability to keep it properly oriented to produce lift. http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae16.cfm "A frisbee has the same shape, in side view, as an airplane wing: the curved uppper surface causes the air to move faster accross the top frisbee than it does across the 'flat' bottom, when the frisbee is thrown. The 'lift' is then produced by the pressure difference between the bottom and top sides of the frisbee - the lower pressure is on top and the higher on the bottom - therefore the net force on the frisbee will be up - producing the needed lift. The turning of the frisbee mostly produces 'stability', that is the spinning keeps the frisbee level in flight due to the 'gyroscopic' effect, i.e. any spinning disc likes to stay spinning at the same angle. You can see for yourself that the spinning has nothing to do with the actual 'flying' of the frisbee by noting that you can spin a frisbee in place, on a stick or whatever, and it will not 'lift up'. You also can see that the frisbee is still spinning at nearly 'full speed' when it finally hits the ground, so you have another piece of evidence that shows that the spinning doesn't lift the frisbee." |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote: The turning of the frisbee mostly produces 'stability', that is the spinning keeps the frisbee level in flight due to the 'gyroscopic' effect, i.e. any spinning disc likes to stay spinning at the same angle. You can see for yourself that the spinning has nothing to do with the actual 'flying' of the frisbee by noting that you can spin a frisbee in place, on a stick or whatever, and it will not 'lift up'. You also can see that the frisbee is still spinning at nearly 'full speed' when it finally hits the ground, so you have another piece of evidence that shows that the spinning doesn't lift the frisbee." And, the "soft frisbees" that are sold in pet stores, and that fly quite well, consist of a thick and quite heavy but soft tubular ring around the outer perimeter (it's the size of your thumb or larger, and almost feels as if it had sand in it), and then just a thin piece of plastic-y cloth like a saggy drumhead across it. Because of the weight of the outer ring, you can put a good spin on it when you launch it, at which point the "drumhead" takes up an upward dome shape, and it maintains that shape and spin throughout its entire flight. As another data point, a sudden gust of wind coming head-on at it can make it suddenly "jump" vertically upward by a sizable amount -- and a gust from behind can make it suddenly drop, even "crash-land". So, the physics of this seems to hold up . . . |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"AES" wrote in message ... Just got our dog a new frisbee (he goes thru 'em pretty fast if we're careless and leave them within reach after a session). .... So, how does a frisbee fly, anyway? Another of his favorites is just a 10" diameter weighted outer rim filled in with a slightly saggy "cloth drumhead", which visibly bulges upward 1" or so at the center into a fair imitation of an airfoil when you throw it. I've always figured the heavy rim kept the thing spinning and thus semi-rigid, and the forward motion of the airfoil shape gave the lift. It is magic! Just like flying an airplane... These folks are trying to explain away the magic he http://mae.ucdavis.edu/~biosport/frisbee/frisbee.html Really, it's just magic... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|