![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan" wrote: Which part on the power cable breaks specifically? The plug that goes into the GPS. It comes apart when you try to unplug it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:37:20 -0500, Dan Luke wrote:
b.. Airways (so you can enter airways for your route instead of each fix on the airway) Yes! I once spoke to someone at Garmin about future upgrades for the 430. One about which I specifically asked was airway-based route entry. This is a feature of the 480, from what I understand, and it would be a huge win for IFR pilots. Yet the representative to whom I spoke claimed that there was a concern that this would make the 430's UI too complex. I don't understand this myself (esp. if they retain the klunky route entry solution as well), but that's what I was told. - Andrew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andrew Gideon wrote: Yet the representative to whom I spoke claimed that there was a concern that this would make the 430's UI too complex. I don't understand this myself (esp. if they retain the klunky route entry solution as well), but that's what I was told. The 430 was developed by Garmin. The 480 was developed by UPSAT and inherited by Garmin. Two different, incompatible design philosophies. UPSAT, the successor to APOLLO/IIMORROW had years of experience to hone their design skills and produce a successful product that is intuitive to use. The 430 was Garmin's first try. That fact that they are still promising an upgrade that was to be delivered five years ago shows how wrong their design philosophy was. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:01:52 +0000, john smith wrote:
The 430 was developed by Garmin. The 480 was developed by UPSAT and inherited by Garmin. I know. But now that they own both, they should be free to steal the UI from one for the other. [...] That fact that they are still promising an upgrade that was to be delivered five years ago shows how wrong their design philosophy was. Laugh Good point. In their defense, though, the TSO for a VNAV/WAAS GPS wasn't defined at the time. - Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() AFAIK, what most pilots are screaming for are all the features of the 396 plus... a.. TOUCH SCREEN...HELLO...TOUCH SCREEN!!!! b.. Airways (so you can enter airways for your route instead of each fix on the airway) c.. The FULL IFR approach d.. ALTITUDES shown for the IFR approaches as well as the MEA's on the airways e.. ALL taxiways with GPS navigation on ALL the airports f.. I won't mind a graphical representation of the airport's traffic patterns with the 45 entry shown. I hope the rumor of the above mentioned new features is not true...I have had MUCH higher hopes for the 496. And a moving map to the vending machines inside the FBO. And...... And..... Sorry, could not resist. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zero-Zero Landings In The Works (For Military Flyers) | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 6th 05 02:01 AM |
crazy but it works, espcially good if you need money | happyone | Piloting | 0 | July 24th 05 04:14 PM |
New GPS from Honeywell/Bendix-King in the works | Jim Burns | Owning | 8 | June 21st 05 10:18 PM |
Handheld GPS Works Fine, Except in One Particular Aircraft | jls | Home Built | 3 | July 5th 04 02:35 AM |