![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bad link.
At 13:06 10 September 2006, Skysoar wrote: Mike Schumann wrote: When you have an organization of this size, the back office is a real problem. The group is too large to run with volunteers, but barely big enough where professional management is efficient and affordable. That is the advantage of becoming affiliated with a larger organization, whether it is the EAA, AOPA or someone else. It provides an opportunity to leverage the existing professional back office infrastructure of that organization, so that the SSA volunteers can focus on what they love: soaring. It may be that what the SSA needs is professional management, but I would submit that the mangaement not be under the EAA or AOPA umbrella (umbrellas don't protect you in ill winds). I'd bet most people have never heard of an association management company (AMC). The AMC model of association management may be just what an association of SSA's size and type of governance needs. You have economies of scale on your side with an AMC. For more info on AMCs: www.iaamc.org. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bad link.
At 13:06 10 September 2006, Skysoar wrote: Mike Schumann wrote: When you have an organization of this size, the back office is a real problem. The group is too large to run with volunteers, but barely big enough where professional management is efficient and affordable. That is the advantage of becoming affiliated with a larger organization, whether it is the EAA, AOPA or someone else. It provides an opportunity to leverage the existing professional back office infrastructure of that organization, so that the SSA volunteers can focus on what they love: soaring. It may be that what the SSA needs is professional management, but I would submit that the mangaement not be under the EAA or AOPA umbrella (umbrellas don't protect you in ill winds). I'd bet most people have never heard of an association management company (AMC). The AMC model of association management may be just what an association of SSA's size and type of governance needs. You have economies of scale on your side with an AMC. For more info on AMCs: www.iaamc.org. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nyal Williams wrote: Bad link. That's odd...it works when I click on it. Try typing it directly into your browser's address bar instead. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Neil Lawson and Accident Investigation | David Roberts | Soaring | 8 | August 15th 05 03:47 PM |
FAA grants AOPA demand for investigation into Meigs closure | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 18 | February 16th 04 11:33 AM |