![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think this is entirely true. I have some old stuff rattling around
in my mind from the 80s which put the rating at least twice this though of course, only in the thrust direction. After all, the instantaneous pressures on change can be rather less than subtle. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ wrote in message ps.com... Danny Deger wrote: Why does the shuttle throttle to 3 Gs on ascent? Danny Deger Because structurally the shuttle vehicle is only stressed for 3 g's. If they didn't throttle back in the late stages of the ascent when the fuel is almost gone and the vehicle is light, it would exceed this level of acceleration. Since the engines are liquid fueled, they can hold full thrust until the fuel is gone. Bud |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the actual thrust abilities of the smes was increased over the life of
the Shuttle, I'm sure I read that. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Richard Riley" wrote in message ... On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:36:52 -0600, "Danny Deger" wrote: Why does the shuttle throttle to 3 Gs on ascent? Danny Deger Heck, I still want to know how to go to 103% throttle. Rather like the old prop jobs (DC-3 comes to mind as an example) that had a wire across the throttle travel, which serves as a stop for full throttle during normal operations. If it was needed for an emergency, like an engine failure on takeoff, you can push through and past the wire for extra emergency power. (100% plus power) Of course, on some engines, that was grounds for grounding the aircraft to inspect the engine, to see if it was damaged from exceeding 100% power. -- Jim in NC |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Riley wrote: Heck, I still want to know how to go to 103% throttle. Because the designers worked for "Spinal Tap". Seriously, because of improvements in its abilities as it went from the original design specifications to actual production, it now is capable of exceeding its originally planned maximum thrust rating by a few percent. Where the hell did my smileys go? My new Thunderbird mail program seems to keep them hidden. Pat |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note. Slugs are a mass measurement whereas pounds are a force. There
is not a simple ratio because it depends on how strong gravity is. Of course the shuttle has accelerations that are quite different than we encounter on the face of the Earth! There was a famous story of gold shippers that moved quantities of gold from San Francisco to Anchorage in the 1800s. Of course they carefully measured the gold before and after, presumably using a spring scale rather than a balance. The bankers concluded a little bit of gold was being lost from every shipment. After a lot of finger-pointing, they identified the difference in gravity as the source of the difference. Dudley Henriques wrote: Bear with me David. I've been away from this stuff for a long while :-)) Rho for SSL is 0.002378 slugs/cu ft. Mass in slugs is the weight in lbs/32.2 For high performance flight test dealing with uncompressible airflow; for density (slugs ft3) for mass airflow (slugs/sec) "David Kazdan" wrote in message t... Dudley: Isn't dynamic pressure expressed in pressure units, pounds per square inch (or SI, Pascals: newtons/sq. meter)? Mass density, which you mention later, is in slugs/cu.in or cu.ft (or SI, Kg/cu.meter). Thanks for all your good posts, I've learned a lot from them over the years. David Dudley Henriques wrote: "Danny Deger" wrote in message ... Why does the shuttle throttle to 3 Gs on ascent? Danny Deger As the shuttle ascends, the dynamic pressure (in slugs/sq.in) increases as the square of the velocity. The shuttle is throttled back to 65% thrust to avoid over stress at a speed computed under what is called critical q. As the shuttle ascends, it is ascending into lower air density (which of course transfers into a lowering dynamic pressure). The throttling back takes the shuttle through a transition area during the ascent that ends as the lowering air density meets the parameters that allow throttle up. This I believe occurs at about 35 to 37K. The point where lowering air density meets the ability to throttle up again is the max q for the shuttle. (Max q meaning maximum dynamic pressure) After reaching max q, the shuttle is go for throttle up as the increasing velocity past max q will never exceed the structural limitations of the shuttle due to it's entrance into lower air density that doesn't have the ability to overstress the structure. Hope this helps a bit. Dudley Henriques |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Gaff" wrote Yes, and it is also why the shedding foam can only do serious damage within the lower atmosphere, as the drag cannot decelerate the chunks enough to strike with enough force to do harm at that altitude. Sorry, but you got that one wrong. The foam does the damage because of the high speed that it has when it hits the shuttle. If there was no drag, the foam would not hit with any force; it would be going the same speed as the shuttle. When a chunk of foam falls off, it is the drag of the stationary atmosphere slowing the foam so effectively and rapidly, that causes the relative closing speeds of the now nearly stationary foam hitting the speeding shuttle. -- Jim in NC |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Gaff" wrote in message news ![]() I don't think this is entirely true. I have some old stuff rattling around in my mind from the 80s which put the rating at least twice this though of course, only in the thrust direction. After all, the instantaneous pressures on change can be rather less than subtle. I agree. I recall that the dynamic air pressure on the shuttle is the limiting factor, and that just happens to come out to the 3 G's that the shuttle experiences. Also, the attachment of the shuttle to the tank is a limiting factor. -- Jim in NC |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans writes:
"Brian Gaff" wrote Yes, and it is also why the shedding foam can only do serious damage within the lower atmosphere, as the drag cannot decelerate the chunks enough to strike with enough force to do harm at that altitude. Sorry, but you got that one wrong. The foam does the damage because of the high speed that it has when it hits the shuttle. If there was no drag, the foam would not hit with any force; it would be going the same speed as the shuttle. When a chunk of foam falls off, it is the drag of the stationary atmosphere slowing the foam so effectively and rapidly, that causes the relative closing speeds of the now nearly stationary foam hitting the speeding shuttle. That's what he said. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, and it is also why the shedding foam can only do serious damage within
the lower atmosphere, as the drag cannot decelerate the chunks enough to strike with enough force to do harm at that altitude. Uh... even with no atmosphere, the rocket is accelerating wrt the detached foam. I'm not convinced this is insignificant. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get maximum height on a winch launch? | Dan G | Soaring | 38 | December 22nd 16 12:29 AM |
NASA: "The Shuttle Was a Mistake" | AES | Piloting | 39 | October 10th 05 01:10 PM |
Is possible to pair a Saitek X35 throttle and a MS Sidewinder Pro? | Riccardo | Simulators | 3 | December 24th 03 06:07 PM |
Boeing: Space shuttles to last into next decade | JohnMcGrew | Piloting | 17 | October 24th 03 09:31 PM |
Cause of Columbia Shuttle Disaster. | Mike Spera | Owning | 2 | August 31st 03 03:11 PM |