![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony wrote:
If you're a fairly experienced pilot -- say 300 plus hours -- what is your usage profile like? About 5% are "overhead" (post maintenance test flights, currency, BFR) About 10% are charity (Young Eagles and other donated flights) About 85% are cross country family trips We do use the plane much like many others would use a family car or a motor home. It allows for trips and activities that would not otherwise be possible due to driving time, or commercial aviation shortcomings (no commercial service to destination/lack of seats on short notice/high cost for 4-6 seats/flight times/etc). We can pack much more into a weekend, such as being in town for a commitment like one of my kids' baseball or soccer games AND visit the grandparents in Phoenix (P19) or hit the ski slopes in Mammoth or Big Bear. With the traffic problems in Southern California, the time benefit of flying can be pretty substantial. A friend from work drove up to Big Bear to spend New Years with us (we'd flown up before Christmas). We both went home on January 1st. It took us 30 minutes to fly home (58nm L35 to L18). It took him 4 hours to drive back with all of the holiday traffic. Even without traffic it takes over 2 hours to drive the 110sm by road. Steve PS -- Just recently learned that www.bigbearairporthouse.com (I have no affiliation with them) has a picture from their web cam at the bottom of their page which shows our Lance parked in the snow behind their property back in December. I can just imagine the call from my boss "If your home sick, how come I see your plane on the web cam at Big Bear?!" :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I expect glider pilots will have a different take -- as best I can tell, that tribe makes no excuses, they fly for the sole pleasure of flying. Sail planes are like sail boats.. they are there for the enjoyment.. and the challenge.. It's just you and "mother nature" BT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:25:09 -0800, "BT" wrote:
Sail planes are like sail boats.. they are there for the enjoyment.. and the challenge.. Gliding is high on my list of future add-ons, 100% for fun. I like the way you kind of "wear" the gliders I've seen, as well as look forward to the lack of engine noise and vibration. G |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got a little over 1,000 hours in both gliders and light GA.
Soaring was for the challenge and the camaraderie- first staying up (and talking about it), then going somewhere (and talking about it), then going somewhere fast (and talking about)... and landing in unexpected locations (and talking about it). Sailplane racing is a peak experience - like sailing in 3D. Light plane flying has been a traveling experience. Living with your plane means the car often never leaves the driveway for several weekends at a time. Even with a relatively slow plane, we can go at least twice as fast as a car to almost any destination 1+ flight hour away. Few destinations are aviation related. The southeastern US has become our playground and extended neighborhood. But having a destination and a desired schedule is also a great challenge. That led to an IFR ticket and a fair amount of use. Trying to get there, when you want, despite the weather, is very satisfying and humbling. And now I have about 900 hours of building time on an RV10. Another great challenge. Try it if you can. Tony wrote: I've checked my log book, and it looks like almost all of my flights are XC of one sort or another. That is, the airplane is pretty much used the way I use my car. It's a convenient way to make a trip that's a few hundred to a thousand miles long. Not all of the trips are necessary (just as not all of the car trips I make are necessary, either). Very few flight legs terminate at the same airport as where the flight started. If you're a fairly experienced pilot -- say 300 plus hours -- what is your usage profile like? My sense, and it could be very wrong, is that we use GA as a tool: there's no doubt we like flying, and probably like me you're happy to be flying, but you have other things to do when you land. For instance, a typical non-business flight for me to Nantucket Island (off Cape Cod, MA, USA) and that brings back memories of cobblestone streets and flowers in gardens behind fences, rather than the CAVU conditions of the flight. It might bring back different memories if required an approach to minimums in fog, but that would be the exception. I expect glider pilots will have a different take -- as best I can tell, that tribe makes no excuses, they fly for the sole pleasure of flying. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
ATC User Fees | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 80 | May 12th 05 07:20 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |