![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If its Photo-Shopped, it is arn good fake. At first I thought what the heck
are they doing. There appears to be a movie camera mounted in front and to the side of the "marshaller." There has been a couple references to C-130's. This is not a C-130, the ramp is W A Y too narrow maybe six feet wide and too short. Any Chinook experts out there? "Daan" wrote in message ... Damned straight it looks dangerous! Wouldn't catch me that near those intakes! Do not fear, that close to the C130 would cause the engines to stall... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly my point in the initial post. But, I agree that a 'tele' might have been used to
add a bit of drama to it, and make things look closer than they are. Al Camp "Daan" wrote in message ... Damned straight it looks dangerous! Wouldn't catch me that near those intakes! Do not fear, that close to the C130 would cause the engines to stall... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly my point in the initial post. But, I agree that a 'tele' might have been used to
add a bit of drama to it, and make things look closer than they are. Al Camp "Daan" wrote in message ... Damned straight it looks dangerous! Wouldn't catch me that near those intakes! Do not fear, that close to the C130 would cause the engines to stall... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blume, Alf wrote:
A tele-lens was used - the aircraft is at least 30 feet away, a bit closer perhaps than when refuelling from a C-135 (and definately higher), but not much. Exactly. What you see in these pictures is a typical illusion of "closeness" produced by a long-focal-length lens. In reality the planes are not that close to each other. Remember not so long ago there was a lot of buzz in mass-media when some kid took a picture of two passenger planes "almost colliding" in the sky? Was it near some US airport? Don't remenber... But anyway, that was the same kind of illusion. -- Best regards, Andrey Tarasevich |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blume, Alf wrote:
A tele-lens was used - the aircraft is at least 30 feet away, a bit closer perhaps than when refuelling from a C-135 (and definately higher), but not much. Exactly. What you see in these pictures is a typical illusion of "closeness" produced by a long-focal-length lens. In reality the planes are not that close to each other. Remember not so long ago there was a lot of buzz in mass-media when some kid took a picture of two passenger planes "almost colliding" in the sky? Was it near some US airport? Don't remenber... But anyway, that was the same kind of illusion. -- Best regards, Andrey Tarasevich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AS/MEL now need ATC permission over East River | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 13 | October 15th 06 01:41 AM |
Permission to photograph airplanes in public | Todd | Piloting | 30 | April 27th 06 06:38 AM |
1.1" Guns aboard USS HONOLULU (CL 48) | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 3 | July 12th 05 05:47 AM |
RNC TFR: Special permission for MMU and TEB but not CDW? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 3 | August 28th 04 07:50 PM |
US Marines Land In Liberia...aboard an Mi-8T!! | Micbloo | Military Aviation | 3 | July 8th 03 04:44 PM |