![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/27/2007 11:14:21 AM, "Viperdoc" wrote:
There is a Cirrus owner on our field who gained himself the nickname "super pull up"- he would accelerate down the runway at low altitude after rotating, and then do a high g chandelle type maneuver. This usually occurred in front of a bunch of experienced warbird/aerobatic pilots, all of whom weren't too impressed. It must be the "low-time pilot" excitement in experiencing the increased G-forces. The Cirrus that spun into the ground here in upstate NY back in 2002, killing both pilot/owners inside, was seen at a nearby airport 30 minutes before the crash performing the exact same maneuvers. The NTSB accident report has a quote from a witness stating this fact. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
Why does it seem like there's a disproportionate number of Cirrus flyers making questionable flying decisions- losing control at high altitude and popping the chute, taking off into low IMC after major maintenance, etc. Many Cirrus owners are probably low-time pilots. Inexperienced pilots represent the majority of GA accidents due to pilot error. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 11:01 am, "Doug" wrote:
Glassy water makes the pilot think he is higher than he actually is. Numerous crashes from this effect. True enough, but he shouldn't have been THAT close to the water's surface to begin with IMHO. From what I've read here (admittedly my only source) it sounds like this guy was trying to recreate the Canadian SNJ waterskiing formation event. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
Glassy water makes the pilot think he is higher than he actually is. Numerous crashes from this effect. And that effect would account for a difference of (let's assume that would have been a sensible altitude) 500 AGL and 0 AGL? You must be joking. Glassy water can be a problem for landings with FLOAT planes. The Cirrus isn't. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
And that effect would account for a difference of (let's assume that would have been a sensible altitude) 500 AGL and 0 AGL? You must be joking. Glassy water can be a problem for landings with FLOAT planes. The Cirrus isn't. Nonsense. They landed. Everybody lived. What's the problem? G -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug writes:
Glassy water makes the pilot think he is higher than he actually is. Numerous crashes from this effect. If they are looking at a houseboat, they have an excellent idea of where the surface actually is. And if one of them said "watch the wheels," they knew they weren't at 2000 feet. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 9:01 am, "Doug" wrote:
Glassy water makes the pilot think he is higher than he actually is. Numerous crashes from this effect. ....true, but given the fact that the water level at Lake Powell is down 100+ feet from its "normal" level, looking UP at the surrounding terrain would give most people a clue that they were a tad low, don't you think? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Except that in many parts of the lake, especially where house boats are
moored, the shoreline still rises gently from the new water level. It's not all cliffs. Still no excuse for flying into the water, however. wrote: ...true, but given the fact that the water level at Lake Powell is down 100+ feet from its "normal" level, looking UP at the surrounding terrain would give most people a clue that they were a tad low, don't you think? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kingfish wrote:
On Feb 27, 10:15 am, "Paul kgyy" wrote: I hereby nominate him/them 2007 Candidate(s) for the Darwin Award. Type of a/c is irrelevant in this case. I second the nomination. Obviously this kind of stupidity can be accomplished in any aircraft, but it makes me wonder if Cirrus should add a "no stupid pilot tricks" clause to the purchase contract. It's my guess his insurance company is not going to be amused. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul kgyy" wrote in message
ups.com... I hereby nominate him/them 2007 Candidate(s) for the Darwin Award. They don't qualify. One requirement is losing the ability to reproduce (either by death or other means). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vampire or venom crash pic - wx904 crash.jpg (1/1) | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 4 | January 1st 07 06:30 PM |
vampire or venom crash pic - wx904 crash.jpg (0/1) | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 30th 06 04:57 PM |
OTA -- a new twist to "call me when you land" | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 6 | June 15th 06 06:02 AM |
A new twist on complaints | Roger | Piloting | 37 | November 11th 05 08:50 AM |
Solid joystick (X-45 or HOTAS quality) with a *twist*? | Zenin | Simulators | 3 | January 26th 04 06:30 AM |