![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxwell wrote:
"B A R R Y" wrote in message I look at a tough BFR as a good thing. With an experienced instructor it can be, but doing things like working weight and balance without a calculator is a bit much. And that was just the beginning. Oh... Needlessly difficult. G He wouldn't let you use a calculator? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
Maxwell wrote: "B A R R Y" wrote in message I look at a tough BFR as a good thing. With an experienced instructor it can be, but doing things like working weight and balance without a calculator is a bit much. And that was just the beginning. Oh... Needlessly difficult. G He wouldn't let you use a calculator? A real life flight, huh? Jeez, if I need to work a weight and balance, then I need a calculator. Just like if I need to fly, I need an airplane. Working all those numbers in my head isn't real life. I'd **** it up for sure. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message . .. Morgans wrote: Attitudes like that is why unions were formed. A professional working a full day should make a decent living, not a welfare living. No. You are worth what somebody is willing to pay. Don't like it? Move. Unions didn't come into existence because of low pay but primarily because of working conditions. Why didn't they come into existence during the pre-Industrial Revolution era when working conditions REALLY sucked? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 10:14 am, "Morgans" wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote If CFIs are willing to work for less than it would be irresponsible to continue to pay them above market with tax payer's money. If they would be paying below market they will be sitting there with no CFIs. Attitudes like that is why unions were formed. A professional working a full day should make a decent living, not a welfare living. Supply and demand/market rate. Or is reality to harsh for you? Why can't everyone be a movie star or pro athlete? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 10:38 pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
The local paper has an article about the local community college that wants to cut the pay of its flight instructors: http://www.registerguard.com/news/20...pilots.0410.p1.... Among other tidbits, I was surprised to see this: "Flight technology is popular, with about a dozen instructors and more than 100 students. The demand for pilots is so strong that most students get jobs soon after completing the degree and flight hour requirements." I teach aviation at a local community college, but I am also a regular faculty at a larger university on a different discipline. From my experience, I agree with the comment that "flight instructors aren't faculty in the usual sense". Faculty have to demonstrate intellect, creativity and insights, none of which are required from a CFI. That doesn't mean CFIs cannot have all these qualities, but merely holding a CFI certificate does not demonstrate those qualities. The only exam they have to take are multiple choice and the questions are known ahead of time. CFIs range from high school drop-outs to astronauts and scientists, so it is difficult to consider them as a single professional group. The article is confusing in one aspect. They say "students get jobs soon after completing the degree and flight hour requirements", yet they say graduating students are not qualified for the airline industry without additional training and experience. It sounds like the jobs the students are getting are not in the airline industry, and if that is true, it is not a very attractive claim. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... From my experience, I agree with the comment that "flight instructors aren't faculty in the usual sense". Faculty have to demonstrate intellect, creativity and insights, none of which are required from a CFI. From what we're seing in academia, those qualities are not needed for faculty, either. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
On Apr 10, 10:38 pm, Jim Logajan wrote: The local paper has an article about the local community college that wants to cut the pay of its flight instructors: http://www.registerguard.com/news/20...pilots.0410.p1.... Among other tidbits, I was surprised to see this: "Flight technology is popular, with about a dozen instructors and more than 100 students. The demand for pilots is so strong that most students get jobs soon after completing the degree and flight hour requirements." I teach aviation at a local community college, but I am also a regular faculty at a larger university on a different discipline. From my experience, I agree with the comment that "flight instructors aren't faculty in the usual sense". Faculty have to demonstrate intellect, creativity and insights, none of which are required from a CFI. That doesn't mean CFIs cannot have all these qualities, but merely holding a CFI certificate does not demonstrate those qualities. The only exam they have to take are multiple choice and the questions are known ahead of time. CFIs range from high school drop-outs to astronauts and scientists, so it is difficult to consider them as a single professional group. The article is confusing in one aspect. They say "students get jobs soon after completing the degree and flight hour requirements", yet they say graduating students are not qualified for the airline industry without additional training and experience. It sounds like the jobs the students are getting are not in the airline industry, and if that is true, it is not a very attractive claim. I can't get back into the original article but didn't it say something about the CFIs got their AA and were getting their BAs at another school? As I mentioned this is awfully like a grad student teaching undergrad students. And I don't know of any of them that are in the union that reps the professors at a university. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Working all those numbers in my head isn't real life. I'd **** it up for sure. As would I! g I screw up deposit slips all the time... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow writes:
From what we're seing in academia, those qualities are not needed for faculty, either. Faculty members just need credentials and a willingness to follow the politically-correct line. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B A R R Y" wrote in message t... Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: Working all those numbers in my head isn't real life. I'd **** it up for sure. As would I! g I screw up deposit slips all the time... He basically just sat back and collected his time while testing my long division skills. But that was only the beginning. He was about 25, had 250 hours. We wasted more than two hours on the oral, 95% of which I will never use. Much more of a test than a discussion or instruction. I knew I had problems when I handed him my original certificate from 1972 and he looked real puzzled and said, "is this really a pilots license". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Local reporter takes an intro flight | Tony Cox | Piloting | 28 | February 25th 07 05:14 AM |
Moncton Flight College - feedback? | [email protected] | Piloting | 20 | January 2nd 07 01:26 AM |
Angel Flight gets some good local press | Dave S | Piloting | 21 | April 11th 05 06:36 PM |
Local flight >227 hours duration | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 4 | February 22nd 05 10:49 PM |
Looking for a flight instructor | Gregory Kozlovsky | General Aviation | 0 | September 7th 03 11:49 PM |