![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. Interestingly with a dew point of 18C, WingX shows the DA going up to 2,213', that about a 300' difference not that much - would be interesting to see how it affects the performance numbers though. Keep well, Hilton "ArtP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:20:43 GMT, "Dallas" wrote: Here's a sample problem: Field Elevation: 1165 Altimeter Setting: 30.10 Temperatu 21°C ___________________ I entered them on my WingX E6B software on my Axim and got PA=995 and DA=1925 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:39:14 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:
Hi, ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. My mistake. I had field elevation at 1160. At 1165, I get PA=1000' and DA=1932'. (2.0.4.3). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:23:19 GMT, ArtP
wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:39:14 GMT, "Hilton" wrote: Hi, ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. My mistake. I had field elevation at 1160. At 1165, I get PA=1000' and DA=1932'. (2.0.4.3). And I can't type either. It should read: PA=1000' and DA=1931'. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote
Using the standard chart: http://pacificrimprinting.com/densalt.pdf 30.1 in. Hg Pressure Altitude Conversion Factor: -165 Pressure Altitude: 1000 Density Altitude: 2000 ___________________ My reading of the chart shows about 1800' density altitude. Bob Moore |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Moore wrote:
Dallas wrote Using the standard chart: http://pacificrimprinting.com/densalt.pdf 30.1 in. Hg Pressure Altitude Conversion Factor: -165 Pressure Altitude: 1000 Density Altitude: 2000 ___________________ My reading of the chart shows about 1800' density altitude. Bob Moore Haha, remember all those old Boeing performance charts, Bob? No two people could ever get the same answer, and no one person could ever get the same answer twice! Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Skylane wrote
Haha, remember all those old Boeing performance charts, Bob? No two people could ever get the same answer, and no one person could ever get the same answer twice! That just meant that you always had a correct solution. :-) Bob Moore |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Apr 2007 20:43:21 GMT, Bob Moore wrote:
My reading of the chart shows about 1800' density altitude. I noticed that too... I took the problem out of the Jeppesen Private Pilot Manual and they came to the 2000' conclusion that I was using. 1800' would make my Sporty's the most accurate. *grumble* But, that doesn't explain why none of the electronic calculators agree with the 1000' pressure altitude on the chart. -- Dallas |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:36:55 GMT, Dallas
wrote: But, that doesn't explain why none of the electronic calculators agree with the 1000' pressure altitude on the chart. Since moisture content of the air has a significant effect on the calculation and I have never seen a specification for relative humidity as part of the "standard day" it would seem that everyone is free to pick their own value which would cause different results. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 1:20 pm, "Dallas" wrote:
My trusty Sporty's Electronic E6B does not agree with the Density Altitude Chart. My instructor is at a loss to explain the difference. Can anybody tell me what's going on? There are lots of ways to calculate density altitude. Most calculators used by pilots, totally ignore humidity, for example, which can make the DA off by a thousand feet. Then there's all the ways of calculating standard temps, by table or other equations. Plus different calculators might round differently. So it's no surprise how different they can be. Want your head to really explode? :-) See below, the most detailed DA paper I've seen: http://wahiduddin.net/calc/density_altitude.htm Cheers, Kev |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Apr 2007 14:11:56 -0700, Kev wrote:
So it's no surprise how different they can be. That makes me feel a little better. My concern is that I'm taking this E6B into the written and I'd hate to find out it's little brain is retarded - after the test. -- Dallas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air density question?? Pilot's Handbook ofAeronautical knowledge | karl gruber | Piloting | 9 | June 29th 06 08:28 PM |
VOR disparity | Rich S. | Home Built | 7 | January 4th 06 08:31 PM |
atmospheric density effects on airfoils | Stubby | General Aviation | 5 | June 24th 05 02:43 AM |
Student needs assistance density altitude calcs | hellothere.adelphia.net | Rotorcraft | 4 | August 19th 04 07:25 AM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |