![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave says...
"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... . At about positive 10 g's while supersonic it exhibited a slight mach tuck which went away at 10.5 g's I didn't explore negative g past 9 because I had a large breakfast and was mildly to slightly uncomfortable. I'm confused, Jim Campbell is a very fat man, and normal people in good shape begin to experience blackouts at 6-7 g's. How might a flabby pile like Zoom expect to calmly evaluate flight characteristics at 10.5 G's?? I really couldn't care less if he rode with Hawking, you pay- you ride, that easy, but who would believe a man that out of shape could fly the way he claims?? That's been mine and a lot of others argument for years .He once claimed to have pulled ,I think positive 10 g's in a Sukoi and close to 9 negative.I might be off a bit on the numbers but they're close. Thus started the famous "Battle of the Sukoi G's" which earned those who participated a battle ribbon.He said he could do it because the seats were slightly reclined. ;-) Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Richard Isakson
says... Gosh "Chuck", that pegged the Zoom meter with a solid 10. Is it possible that "Chuck" is actually just a Zoom sock puppet? Does anyone have a photo of "Chuck" and Zoom together at the same time? None of this Photoshop stuff but an unaltered photo? Now, I know what you're thinking: "but Zoom is always attacking "Chuck". What about that." That could be just an aspect of Campbell's self hatred! Or is Zoom one of "Chuck's" personalities? Nice try Richard but no joy :-)Ouster has pics of me and zoomy talking just before the cops escorted him off the SnF grounds. I just try to analyze my enemy and know his every move because "the Shadow knows Heh,heh ,heh ,heh". Chuck(Lamont Cranston) S |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Richard Riley says...
On Wed, 9 May 2007 13:33:03 -0300, "Dave" wrote: "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... . At about positive 10 g's while supersonic it exhibited a slight mach tuck which went away at 10.5 g's I didn't explore negative g past 9 because I had a large breakfast and was mildly to slightly uncomfortable. I'm confused, Jim Campbell is a very fat man, and normal people in good shape begin to experience blackouts at 6-7 g's. How might a flabby pile like Zoom expect to calmly evaluate flight characteristics at 10.5 G's?? I really couldn't care less if he rode with Hawking, you pay- you ride, that easy, but who would believe a man that out of shape could fly the way he claims?? Sadly, enough people to keep him (barely) in business. And there are real world consequences to people believing that crap. Not many people in this market are getting rich (Dick Van Grunsven being the one exception). If Zoom goes after a company he costs them a few sales - and that could be the diffence between making it and not. Years ago he reviewed a little homebuilt called the Capella. Later they got on his ****list, but when he reviewed it he did his standared "looped, rolled and spun" story. A year later, a couple of kids (without licenses) flying a non-registered but N number wearing 2 place tried a zoom and pull, and pulled the wings off. We know for they read Zoom's story. Did he influence their decision? It's likely. Zoom lies, people and businesses die. True story ...sad but true Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote Nice try Richard but no joy :-)Ouster has pics of me and zoomy talking just before the cops escorted him off the SnF grounds. I just try to analyze my enemy and know his every move because "the Shadow knows Heh,heh ,heh ,heh". I think that you have forgotten a very important thing. You should always remember to: Govern yourself accordingly! g -- Jim in NC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 8:38 am, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote: Years ago he reviewed a little homebuilt called the Capella. Later they got on his ****list, but when he reviewed it he did his standared "looped, rolled and spun" story. A year later, a couple of kids (without licenses) flying a non-registered but N number wearing 2 place tried a zoom and pull, and pulled the wings off. We know for they read Zoom's story. Did he influence their decision? It's likely. Zoom lies, people and businesses die. True story ...sad but true Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret- Hide quoted text - Hey, Chuck...does anyone have the N Number and full type of aircraft on this one? Or, a copy or reference (link?) to the accident report? Thanks...Bear! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com, DABEAR
says... On May 10, 8:38 am, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: Years ago he reviewed a little homebuilt called the Capella. Later they got on his ****list, but when he reviewed it he did his standared "looped, rolled and spun" story. A year later, a couple of kids (without licenses) flying a non-registered but N number wearing 2 place tried a zoom and pull, and pulled the wings off. We know for they read Zoom's story. Did he influence their decision? It's likely. Zoom lies, people and businesses die. True story ...sad but true Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret- Hide quoted text - Hey, Chuck...does anyone have the N Number and full type of aircraft on this one? Or, a copy or reference (link?) to the accident report? Thanks...Bear! Hey Bear I'll see if I can find it .I'm pretty sure I have the issue with his flight report and probably also have one with the crash report. Chuck S |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Years ago he reviewed a little homebuilt called the Capella. Later they got on his ****list, but when he reviewed it he did his standared "looped, rolled and spun" story. A year later, a couple of kids (without licenses) flying a non-registered but N number wearing 2 place tried a zoom and pull, and pulled the wings off. We know for they read Zoom's story. Did he influence their decision? It's likely. Zoom lies, people and businesses die -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- I'm no Zoom defender, but it's a stretch to blame Zoom for anyone who kills themselves ripping wings off of most anything airworthy. I've looped, rolled and spun everything I've ever owned or rented except for my Flybaby and a twin Comanche. These maneuvers can be accomplished safely under 3 positive g's. By a couple of unlicensed kids teaching themselves? Unlikely. My favorite steed, an RV-3, has one of the worst reputations for shedding wings. It a plane that is very slippery and has delightfully light stick forces. Bank & yank, zoom & pull with RECKLESS abandon... and the automatic wing remover will begin self activation at 6 g's. GUARANTEED!!!!! It's a piece of cake to demo the RV-3 at 2 feet off the ground at 220 mph.... then rotate vertical in front of a crowd for an easy one thousand foot gain with no more than 4 g's on the meter. OTOH.... more than one pilot has lost a wing or two just buzzing the local airport, hot dogging for the home boys. So, what do we have...? 1. What you don't know can kill you. 2. Knowing Zoom can kill you. Be governed accordingly!!!! ;-) Barnyard BOb - 53 years of powered flight |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barnyard BOb" wrote Be governed accordingly!!!! ;-) _Close_ to perfect use of the modified phrase. ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote: Be governed accordingly!!!! ;-) _Close_ to perfect use of the modified phrase. ;-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- What might perfect be? Be governed 'accordianly'? Barnyard BOb |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barnyard BOb" wrote in message
... "Morgans" wrote: Be governed accordingly!!!! ;-) _Close_ to perfect use of the modified phrase. ;-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- What might perfect be? Be governed 'accordianly'? Barnyard BOb You lost bonus points for omitting the multiple "!!!!"! Rancid Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jet fuel A-1 specific gravity | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | May 20th 06 04:39 PM |
Sub-gravity sensation | Rod | Soaring | 4 | March 7th 04 03:20 PM |
Gravity Waves | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | December 10th 03 06:13 AM |
Gravity launch | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 9 | October 8th 03 03:32 AM |