![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MB" == Matt Barrow writes:
MB Got a cite for that? Usenet ain't a peer reviewed journal, ferchrissake. Requests for "cites" are almost always a signal the requestor has been effectively out-argued. If the requestor really wanted a cite they'd google for it. -- If I ever went to war, instead of throwing a grenade, I'd throw one of those small pumpkins. Then maybe my enemy would pick up the pumpkin and think about the futility of war. And that would give me the time I need to hit him with a real grenade. - Jack Handey |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Barrow" wrote:
"Floyd L. Davidson" wrote: "Matt Barrow" wrote: Oh, they know where it is (Continental shelf, ANWR, etc.), so exploration is rather worthless. Do you know what the know proven reserves in ANWR are? ZERO barrels. None, nada, zip. Got a cite for that? [Rest of blather snipped] Blather, eh? Lets see you cite *any* proven reserves in ANWR. First, you can start with the USGS "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 1002 Area, Petroleum Assessment, 1998, Including Economic Analysis" report the Congress, http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-0028-01/fs-0028-01.pdf See Figure 2, for a map that shows the location of the one and the only exporation well ever drilled in ANWR (by Chevron on 1985). Chevron was so tight lipped about that particular hole that they even shipped the waste to the Lower-48 for disposal at their own facilities rather than risk any of it getting into the hands of a competitor to be analyzed if it were sent to the nearby facilities at Prudhoe Bay. And do read the rest of the report to find where it lists proven reserves. You might learn a lot, but it will not give you any numbers for *proven* reserves, because there are none. Ball's in your court... and you might go read the rest of that "blather" and see if it isn't just as precisely correct as the comment about zero proven reserves i ANWR. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 8:18 am, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: The fact is that U.S. refining capacity has been growing at about 1% a year for the past decade - the equivalent of adding a mid-size refinery every year. Since 1996, U.S. refiners have expanded capacity by more than 2 million barrels a day This is a remarkable achievement in the face of environmental mandates setting new ethanol usage and low-sulfur requirements. But the last major refinery built in the U.S. was in Garyville, La., in 1976 and the ones we have are getting older, no matter how well they're maintained. I dont know about the rest of the country but I do know about Louisiana. Right now you cannot go to a refinery complex on the Southern Louisiana area and not see them doing MASSIVE expansion, doubling sometimes tripling the refinery complex. From Norco/Avondale/ St. Rose near MSY (just south of it) up the river to L38 (Gonzalez) where Sorento/Giesimer/Fina etc all the way to Baton Rouge (Port Allen) the bulldozers and welders are working as we speak. You mention Garyville. That is the Marathon Garyville refinery near REserve airport. In the last year it has doubled its size and now is set for at least a doubling of that size. They are 'as we speak" clearing the old sugar cane fields for new "smokestacks". The Chocktow is also expanding. the "we have not built a new refinery since XXXX" sounds good but is misleading. Avgas in LA is cracked at the Sorento refinery near L38. Robert At St. James tank farm it has tripled since Katrina the number of storage tanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luke Skywalker" wrote in message ps.com... On May 16, 8:18 am, "Matt Barrow" wrote: The fact is that U.S. refining capacity has been growing at about 1% a year for the past decade - the equivalent of adding a mid-size refinery every year. Since 1996, U.S. refiners have expanded capacity by more than 2 million barrels a day This is a remarkable achievement in the face of environmental mandates setting new ethanol usage and low-sulfur requirements. But the last major refinery built in the U.S. was in Garyville, La., in 1976 and the ones we have are getting older, no matter how well they're maintained. I dont know about the rest of the country but I do know about Louisiana. Right now you cannot go to a refinery complex on the Southern Louisiana area and not see them doing MASSIVE expansion, doubling sometimes tripling the refinery complex. From Norco/Avondale/ St. Rose near MSY (just south of it) up the river to L38 (Gonzalez) where Sorento/Giesimer/Fina etc all the way to Baton Rouge (Port Allen) the bulldozers and welders are working as we speak. Doing what? You say "expansion", but what are they expanding? Now, if you'd read back to the original article, you'd find some interesting data that you happened to snip. You mention Garyville. That is the Marathon Garyville refinery near REserve airport. In the last year it has doubled its size and now is set for at least a doubling of that size. They are 'as we speak" clearing the old sugar cane fields for new "smokestacks". The Chocktow is also expanding. "Expanding" what? Capacity? How much capacity expansion? (Original vs new). the "we have not built a new refinery since XXXX" sounds good but is misleading. Only if we can keep updating 1970's technology. Avgas in LA is cracked at the Sorento refinery near L38. ---------------- (What follows is not necessarily directed at Luke) Hey, folks! Keep the old crap. Keep ANWR, the outer shelf and all the rest nice and pristine. There's no shortage of capacity (according to our resident "experts"), so what are we worried about. If the price goes to $4.00 for Mogas and $5.50 for avgas, it's just the oil companies ripping us off. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Barrow" wrote:
"Luke Skywalker" wrote in message ups.com... On May 16, 8:18 am, "Matt Barrow" wrote: The fact is that U.S. refining capacity has been growing at about 1% a year for the past decade - the equivalent of adding a mid-size refinery every year. Since 1996, U.S. refiners have expanded capacity by more than 2 million barrels a day This is a remarkable achievement in the face of environmental mandates setting new ethanol usage and low-sulfur requirements. But the last major refinery built in the U.S. was in Garyville, La., in 1976 and the ones we have are getting older, no matter how well they're maintained. I dont know about the rest of the country but I do know about Louisiana. Right now you cannot go to a refinery complex on the Southern Louisiana area and not see them doing MASSIVE expansion, doubling sometimes tripling the refinery complex. From Norco/Avondale/ St. Rose near MSY (just south of it) up the river to L38 (Gonzalez) where Sorento/Giesimer/Fina etc all the way to Baton Rouge (Port Allen) the bulldozers and welders are working as we speak. Doing what? You say "expansion", but what are they expanding? Capacity. Now, if you'd read back to the original article, you'd find some interesting data that you happened to snip. Nothing in the original article was valid. Why bother re-reading it. You mention Garyville. That is the Marathon Garyville refinery near REserve airport. In the last year it has doubled its size and now is set for at least a doubling of that size. They are 'as we speak" clearing the old sugar cane fields for new "smokestacks". The Chocktow is also expanding. "Expanding" what? Capacity? How much capacity expansion? (Original vs new). Typically when any one refinery has been expanded, they go for enough added capacity to provide whatever increase is needed plus enough to shutdown at least one other refinery. That is why for decades now there have been no "new" refineries built, but there has been a steady increase in capacity and a dramatic decrease in the number of refineries. the "we have not built a new refinery since XXXX" sounds good but is misleading. Only if we can keep updating 1970's technology. An absurd statement. Why would anyone want to do that, and since when is anyone trying to do that. 1970's technology is what they are eliminating as fast as they can. There's no shortage of capacity (according to our resident "experts"), so what are we worried about. If the price goes to $4.00 for Mogas and $5.50 for avgas, it's just the oil companies ripping us off. Given that they can expand refinery capacity at will, what else would you want to call it? -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 3:22 pm, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: "Luke Skywalker" wrote in message I am not a refinery expert nor do I play one on TV...but what I do know is that they are massivly increasing the acreage of these facilities and the history is when they do that...the old facilities keep right on going. is it 70's technology? I dont know. The Nimitz and the Ronald Reagan "Look" alot a like but the technology on The Nimitz when she was built isnt the technology that they put on The Ronald Reagan. Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alodine Availability in the UK? | Martin Evans | Home Built | 3 | March 30th 06 08:35 PM |
AvGas Availability? | john smith | Piloting | 12 | September 7th 05 01:00 PM |
MOGAS availability database | [email protected] | Piloting | 51 | May 9th 05 12:02 AM |
RST Intercom availability date? | Don | Home Built | 6 | December 3rd 03 07:01 PM |
TCP availability | David Kinsell | Piloting | 1 | November 4th 03 03:06 PM |