![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote
How do autopilots make coordinated turns even when they cannot control the rudder? From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia An unwanted side-effect of aileron operation is adverse yaw — a yawing moment in the opposite direction to the turn generated by the ailerons. In other words, using the ailerons to roll an aircraft to the right would produce a yawing motion to the left. It is caused by an increase in induced drag due to the greater effective camber of the wing with a downward- deflected aileron, and the opposite effect on the other wing. Modern aileron systems have minimal adverse yaw, such that it is barely noticeable in most turns. This may be accomplished by the use of differential ailerons, which have been rigged such that the downgoing aileron deflects less than the upward-moving one. Frise ailerons achieve the same effect by protruding beneath the wing of an upward deflected aileron, increasing drag on that side. Ailerons may also use a combination of these methods. Bob Moore |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Moore writes:
An unwanted side-effect of aileron operation is adverse yaw — a yawing moment in the opposite direction to the turn generated by the ailerons. In other words, using the ailerons to roll an aircraft to the right would produce a yawing motion to the left. It is caused by an increase in induced drag due to the greater effective camber of the wing with a downward- deflected aileron, and the opposite effect on the other wing. Modern aileron systems have minimal adverse yaw, such that it is barely noticeable in most turns. This may be accomplished by the use of differential ailerons, which have been rigged such that the downgoing aileron deflects less than the upward-moving one. Frise ailerons achieve the same effect by protruding beneath the wing of an upward deflected aileron, increasing drag on that side. Ailerons may also use a combination of these methods. Except I do see adverse yaw in turns in my (simulated) Baron, so either the simulation is in error, or the AP knows something about making coordinated turns without rudder input that I do not. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Bob Moore writes: An unwanted side-effect of aileron operation is adverse yaw — a yawing moment in the opposite direction to the turn generated by the ailerons. In other words, using the ailerons to roll an aircraft to the right would produce a yawing motion to the left. It is caused by an increase in induced drag due to the greater effective camber of the wing with a downward- deflected aileron, and the opposite effect on the other wing. Modern aileron systems have minimal adverse yaw, such that it is barely noticeable in most turns. This may be accomplished by the use of differential ailerons, which have been rigged such that the downgoing aileron deflects less than the upward-moving one. Frise ailerons achieve the same effect by protruding beneath the wing of an upward deflected aileron, increasing drag on that side. Ailerons may also use a combination of these methods. Except I do see adverse yaw in turns in my (simulated) Baron, It's not a Baron, fjukktarfd, it;s a comnputer. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
ignorant nonsense snipped No, this is where you're comparing your simulator to real life. Again with the real doll scenario. They're not meant to actually REPLACE a girlfriend. Oh, right, but you have no interest in getting laid. BTW, Anime doesn't count, either. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic opined
Bob Moore writes: An unwanted side-effect of aileron operation is adverse yaw — a yawing moment in the opposite direction to the turn generated by the ailerons. In other words, using the ailerons to roll an aircraft to the right would produce a yawing motion to the left. It is caused by an increase in induced drag due to the greater effective camber of the wing with a downward- deflected aileron, and the opposite effect on the other wing. Modern aileron systems have minimal adverse yaw, such that it is barely noticeable in most turns. This may be accomplished by the use of differential ailerons, which have been rigged such that the downgoing aileron deflects less than the upward-moving one. Frise ailerons achieve the same effect by protruding beneath the wing of an upward deflected aileron, increasing drag on that side. Ailerons may also use a combination of these methods. Except I do see adverse yaw in turns in my (simulated) Baron, so either the simulation is in error, or the AP knows something about making coordinated turns without rudder input that I do not. Looks like you found a simulator error. Load a 172, and try very slow flight without using the rudder. Use power, hold altitude and keep slowing until you stall. You should emd up in a spin. -ash Cthulhu in 2007! Why wait for nature? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ash Wyllie writes:
Looks like you found a simulator error. Load a 172, and try very slow flight without using the rudder. Use power, hold altitude and keep slowing until you stall. You should emd up in a spin. Why would I do that? It has nothing to do with my question: How can autopilots make coordinated turns without control of the rudder? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Ash Wyllie writes: Looks like you found a simulator error. Load a 172, and try very slow flight without using the rudder. Use power, hold altitude and keep slowing until you stall. You should emd up in a spin. Why would I do that? It has nothing to do with my question: How can autopilots make coordinated turns without control of the rudder? They don't moron, and you have been told. It's just not necessary. Sorry your sim can't duplicate it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic opined
Ash Wyllie writes: Looks like you found a simulator error. Load a 172, and try very slow flight without using the rudder. Use power, hold altitude and keep slowing until you stall. You should emd up in a spin. Why would I do that? It has nothing to do with my question: How can autopilots make coordinated turns without control of the rudder? 1) To test the simulator. 2) Newer light aircraft are designed so that at cruise speed and small aileron deflections rudder input is not needed. -ash Cthulhu in 2007! Why wait for nature? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Ash Wyllie writes: Looks like you found a simulator error. Load a 172, and try very slow flight without using the rudder. Use power, hold altitude and keep slowing until you stall. You should emd up in a spin. Why would I do that? It has nothing to do with my question: How can autopilots make coordinated turns without control of the rudder? it has everythign to do wiht your question, fjukktard. Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... ... Except I do see adverse yaw in turns in my (simulated) Baron, so either the simulation is in error, or the AP knows something about making coordinated turns without rudder input that I do not. Yup, that pretty much sums it up. Either your simulation is in error, or you havn't mastered the basics yet. Mystery solved. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
Coordinated turns and the little ball | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 51 | October 11th 06 10:17 PM |
Is rudder required for coordinated turns? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 41 | September 24th 06 06:40 PM |
DGs and Autopilots | Andrew Gideon | Products | 11 | April 14th 05 06:04 PM |
Coordinated turning stall and spins | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 20 | November 18th 03 08:46 PM |