A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stupid Pilot Tricks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 10th 07, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Stupid Pilot Tricks

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:46:09 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote:
Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight
pilots meet Part 91 regulations also?


Yes and no, respectively.


So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable
rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and
structures incorrect, no?


If all parts of Part 103.1 "Applicability" (including the "intended" part
of 103.1(a) regarding single occupant) were satisfied, then it is my
understanding that no aspect of Part 91 is applicable. But there is always
103.9(a) "Hazardous operations", which is rather subjective. Then I suspect
it's a matter of the facts of the case and the persuasiveness of the
arguments the opposing lawyers make to the judge.
  #2  
Old July 10th 07, 08:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 123
Default Stupid Pilot Tricks



Larry Dighera wrote:
Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight
pilots meet Part 91 regulations also?


Yes and no, respectively.


So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable
rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and
structures incorrect, no?


Somewhat, but they can still stick the pilot.
Sec. 103.9 Hazardous operations.

(a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that
creates a
hazard to other persons or property.-c


  #3  
Old July 10th 07, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Stupid Pilot Tricks

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:33:37 -0700, Richard Riley
wrote in
:

If there were 2 people on board, it can't be a 103 ultralight.


Unless it's a training flight, right?
  #4  
Old July 10th 07, 08:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 123
Default Stupid Pilot Tricks


"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...

I know the overweight ones are registered Experimental, and are
subject to Part 91. It's difficult to discern any 'N' number in the
photograph.


If there were 2 people on board, it can't be a 103 ultralight.


Specifically,

Sec. 103.1 Applicability.

This part prescribes rules governing the operation of ultralight
vehicles
in the United States. For the purposes of this part, an ultralight vehicle
is
a vehicle that:
(a) Is used or intended to be used for manned operation in the air by a
single occupant;
And (e) If powered:
(1) Weighs less than 254 pounds empty weight, excluding floats and
safety
devices which are intended for deployment in a potentially catastrophic
situation;


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Pilot Tricks? Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe Rotorcraft 2 May 8th 07 04:00 AM
Stupid Pilot Tricks - Insurance Co. Trying to Back Out Bob Chilcoat Piloting 54 October 8th 04 10:15 AM
Stupid pilot tricks Bob Chilcoat Piloting 20 September 18th 04 06:44 PM
More Stupid Govenment Tricks john smith Piloting 8 September 2nd 04 04:35 AM
Stupid Pilot Tricks David Dyer-Bennet Piloting 3 October 19th 03 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.