![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shirl" wrote in message ... "Al G" wrote: Al G, 7 engine failures on 6 aircraft, no off field (unscheduled) landings. 7 engine failures on 6 aircraft ... in how many years? how many hours? Just wondering because the off-the-cuff attitude expressed here (which, having had one, I disagree with) is that "the odds are very small" of having an actual engine failure. Hardly seems that's been the case with you! Bottom line is that whether it's none, one or six, small odds don't mean that it doesn't happen or that you don't have to concern yourself with being prepared. Even though Kirk says his recent practices have been hit and miss, he would, by virtue of the fact that he's been *doing them* and thinking about that process, at least have the drill and how the airplane reacts to various things fresh in his mind -- in terms of having some degree of preparedness, isn't that a better place to be in the event of an actual failure than if you hadn't practiced the drill since your last BFR (which could be as long as two years ago)? 35 Years, 7000 civilian hrs. Largely CFI & 135. Mooney 201, induction icing, at night, 30 North of Medford, shot the ILS. Aeronca Champ, carburetor icing, left downwind, 2nd in a flight of two. C-340, both engines, fuel icing, 100 nm North of Reno, got 1 lit lower. C-210, Mechanic induced induction failure, 250' on departure, landed straight ahead. Piper Aztec, Mechanic induced engine fire, same mechanic as 210, 50 South of Medford. C337, Pressurized, Cylinder head blew off the rear engine, on rotation at Boeing. 6 paved runways, 5 of them had a bar, (extra points). Obviously Ice has played a major role. To this day I drink beer, which is served without ice. Al G CFIAMI 2069297 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you shoot the mechanic after the second forced landing he caused?
(just being facetious, but I'll bet you and he parted ways after that) Had a friend who "almost" had a cylinder blow apart on a Skymaster. It was cracked about 3/4 the way around. Happened on a flight of young eagles. It was also the rear engine. He detected a bit of vibration and returned to the airport. David Johnson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... Did you shoot the mechanic after the second forced landing he caused? (just being facetious, but I'll bet you and he parted ways after that) Had a friend who "almost" had a cylinder blow apart on a Skymaster. It was cracked about 3/4 the way around. Happened on a flight of young eagles. It was also the rear engine. He detected a bit of vibration and returned to the airport. David Johnson As a matter of fact, two years after the second mechanic related failure, I was flying a 414 for a Fruit Company when they hired a new mechanic. You guessed it. I quit. Two times was enough. Al G |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shirl" wrote in message ... "Al G" wrote: Al G, 7 engine failures on 6 aircraft, no off field (unscheduled) landings. 7 engine failures on 6 aircraft ... in how many years? how many hours? Just wondering because the off-the-cuff attitude expressed here (which, having had one, I disagree with) is that "the odds are very small" of having an actual engine failure. Hardly seems that's been the case with you! Bottom line is that whether it's none, one or six, small odds don't mean that it doesn't happen or that you don't have to concern yourself with being prepared. Even though Kirk says his recent practices have been hit and miss, he would, by virtue of the fact that he's been *doing them* and thinking about that process, at least have the drill and how the airplane reacts to various things fresh in his mind -- in terms of having some degree of preparedness, isn't that a better place to be in the event of an actual failure than if you hadn't practiced the drill since your last BFR (which could be as long as two years ago)? It occurs to me after reading my post, that I missed mentioning one of the more important points. In an emergency, you will act just like you trained. The things you practice, you will do automatically when faced with surprise and threat. Practice closing the throttle a little earlier, a little further out, each landing. You pick up a terrific feel for the attitude of a good glide. One of my engine outs was an induction system failure at 250' on departure. The T210 was climbing smartly with gear in transit about halfway down the runway(4000'), when the thing just quit like you pulled the throttle to idle. While I was looking dumbfounded at the MP and RPM, my left hand was gently pushing over to just the right attitude for the upcoming glide. I think for a second there I was almost in shock. Nevertheless, I did just right. You would be amazed at what your brain can do when you've taught it correctly. One of my students once said, "Luck is where opportunity meets preparation". Al G |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Al G" wrote:
It occurs to me after reading my post, that I missed mentioning one of the more important points. In an emergency, you will act just like you trained. The things you practice, you will do automatically when faced with surprise and threat. Practice closing the throttle a little earlier, a little further out, each landing. You pick up a terrific feel for the attitude of a good glide. One of my engine outs was an induction system failure at 250' on departure. The T210 was climbing smartly with gear in transit about halfway down the runway(4000'), when the thing just quit like you pulled the throttle to idle. While I was looking dumbfounded at the MP and RPM, my left hand was gently pushing over to just the right attitude for the upcoming glide. I think for a second there I was almost in shock. Nevertheless, I did just right. You would be amazed at what your brain can do when you've taught it correctly. One of my students once said, "Luck is where opportunity meets preparation". I agree about what your brain can do when you've taught/programmed it correctly. But the more time that elapses from whence you last did that training/programming, the less automatic it becomes. You may still remember all the items in the drill, but it may take a few extra seconds to remember them -- in the type of emergencies we're talking about, few extra seconds may make a huge difference in the outcome. So I think the key phrase in what you said above is that "the things you *practice*" will be done automatically. In order to maintain that necessary level of automatic reaction, it has to be practiced/re-programmed with some regularity (more often than once every other year). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shirl" wrote in message ... "Al G" wrote: It occurs to me after reading my post, that I missed mentioning one of the more important points. In an emergency, you will act just like you trained. The things you practice, you will do automatically when faced with surprise and threat. Practice closing the throttle a little earlier, a little further out, each landing. You pick up a terrific feel for the attitude of a good glide. One of my engine outs was an induction system failure at 250' on departure. The T210 was climbing smartly with gear in transit about halfway down the runway(4000'), when the thing just quit like you pulled the throttle to idle. While I was looking dumbfounded at the MP and RPM, my left hand was gently pushing over to just the right attitude for the upcoming glide. I think for a second there I was almost in shock. Nevertheless, I did just right. You would be amazed at what your brain can do when you've taught it correctly. One of my students once said, "Luck is where opportunity meets preparation". I agree about what your brain can do when you've taught/programmed it correctly. But the more time that elapses from whence you last did that training/programming, the less automatic it becomes. You may still remember all the items in the drill, but it may take a few extra seconds to remember them -- in the type of emergencies we're talking about, few extra seconds may make a huge difference in the outcome. So I think the key phrase in what you said above is that "the things you *practice*" will be done automatically. In order to maintain that necessary level of automatic reaction, it has to be practiced/re-programmed with some regularity (more often than once every other year). Absolutely. Al G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you experienced pilots just have a sixth sense about how to get the
aircraft exactly where it needs to be? Is it something you consciously analyze throughout the descent or just instinctlvely do? It helps to know the typical field size in your area. Then you could think "this is my intended touchdown point, I want to be two fields to a side and three fields behind it, and see it at an angle of, say, 40 degrees". Mind you, I have never flown power, and I am not exactly experienced either :-) Bartek |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Knowing your power-off descent rate will help. In my plane, I know that
my power off descent rate at best glide speed is about 50% higher than the 500 ft./min rate that I generally use in a normal pattern. If I arrive at 1, 000 ft. AGL abeam of my landing spot. I know that I'll have to make an abbreviated pattern to make the runway. I also aim for a spot a several hundred feet down the landing area to prevent landing short. The sight picture through the windshield on final will tell you where you're going to go. If you're overshooting, your landing spot will move down. If you're coming up short, the landing spot will move up in the windshield. I try to overshoot slightly as I turn final, then adjust the descent rate with a hard slip to put it down at the near edge of the landing area. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200710/1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:31:04 GMT, "JGalban via AviationKB.com"
u32749@uwe wrote: Knowing your power-off descent rate will help. This whole discussion sounds like an argument against power-on approaches. I was taught power-on by a former military pilot. Then he went off to the airlines and my new, older, civilian-trained pilot instructed me to go throttle all the way back at the numbers, then fly the rest of the pattern without any more power than it took to "clear" the engine from time to time. Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollins www.FlyingTigersBook.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency landing at airfield | Danny Deger | Piloting | 10 | January 8th 07 06:31 PM |
Emergency landing theoretical | gatt | Piloting | 21 | May 15th 06 03:07 PM |
Live emergency landing on tv right now | C. Massey | Piloting | 7 | May 4th 06 02:49 AM |
C-141 emergency landing Christchurch | Miche | Military Aviation | 11 | February 6th 04 04:04 AM |
N30793, Emergency Landing | Tom Hughes | Piloting | 5 | August 21st 03 03:56 AM |