![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The child of two Americans, born overseas, does not automatically have
American citizenship. He must spend three? years in the U.S. before his 21st? birthday in order to nail it down. Wrong!!! The child of Americans born abroad is automatically a US citizen. All the parents need do is apply for a certificate at the embassy. My daughter, born in Germany has one, signed by the Sec of State George Schultz. The law regarding US nationality by children born abroad to one or two US citizen parents has changed several times over the years and the exact law that applies will depend on when the person was born, whether one or both parents are US citizens, and whether the parents are married at the time of the birth. The current laws can be found on the State Department website at http://travel.state.gov/acquisition.html As a child of US citizens she could not claim German citizenship, the rules in other countries vary. Unless you or your wife was a German citizen, your daughter would not have had any claim to German citizenship. Until recently, Germany did not confer citizenship based on birth in Germany. You were German if you had a German parent. Birth in Germany played no part in equation. Germany has recently allowed children born in Germany to long term residents to have German citizenship. However if one parent were a third country national, the child could claim dual citizenship and decide later. Keep in mind that there is no requirement, by the US, to "decide" on which citizenship you wish to have. A person with dual US/other citizenship can keep both citizenships for life, as far as the US is concerned. The "other" country may or may not have a requirement to "choose" or "decide", but the US does not. Stephen Gallagher |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
:the freedom to get a job in another EU country :applies to the military as well. : Wow. No wonder the Brits are uneasy about their membership in the : Community. : My first reaction was what they would do when thousands of Turks : turned up at the recruiting office ... then I remembered the Ghurkas. : (And the Irish.) Yes, and don't forget what would happen if a Czech or Pole would show up at the recruitment office and be denied entry. His countrymen might just think that that's unfair. : What does the EU say about language requriements for such employment? I see nothing that objects to the RAF rejecting recruits on the basis of deficient language skills, or other lack of ability. -- Emmanuel Gustin |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emmanuel.Gustin" wrote in message ... Cub Driver wrote: :Why the double standard? Why the hipocracy? Why the predjudice? : It's none of the above. The United States takes the attitude that : citizenship comes with residence, not bloodline. Britain (and I think : most European countries) take the opposite view. AFAIK this is the German point of view, but not shared by most European nations, including Britain. You can be refused UK citizenship even after a long stay if the law thinks you're a shady character -- read Muhammed Al-Fayed -- but one can perfectly be naturalised else. The RAF can presumably be more strict, although they probably could be made to accept all EU citizens. IIRC there has been a ruling by the European court that the freedom to get a job in another EU country applies to the military as well. -- Emmanuel Gustin We are currently below strength in the RAF. We have a deficit of just over a 1,000 in the non-commissioned ranks. TJ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote in
: Why the double standard? Why the hipocracy? Why the predjudice? It's none of the above. The United States takes the attitude that citizenship comes with residence, not bloodline. Britain (and I think most European countries) take the opposite view. The child of two Americans, born overseas, does not automatically have American citizenship. He must spend three? years in the U.S. before his 21st? birthday in order to nail it down. Non, as others have noted. Whether an American citizen passes on American citizenship to a child born outside the US depends on the *citizen's* residence in the US. For me, born in the US and having lived in the US most of my life*, my kid Ethelred is automatically a US citizen no matter where he's born, let's hypothesize Jimbostan. But if Eggfilth remains in Jimbostan and never comes to the US, his kids born abroad will *not* be US citizens at birth, even though they are the children of an American citizen. Jim, who notes that you learn all sorts of interesting things when you marry a foreign Canadian person. *all of it, if they'd count the times when my dad was stationed in Germany as US residence -- Jim Battista A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:47:30 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote: the freedom to get a job in another EU country applies to the military as well. Wow. No wonder the Brits are uneasy about their membership in the Community. My first reaction was what they would do when thousands of Turks turned up at the recruiting office ... then I remembered the Ghurkas. I read somewhere that in the Korean Conflict the Turkish troops were regarded by the North Koreans as quite fearsome fighters. To the extent that the North Koreans would avoid engagement in any area they knew to have Turkish soldiers. I haven't read much about Korea, so I don't have any feel for true this is, though. Perhaps someone else knows? Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Dec 2003 12:02:21 GMT, Emmanuel.Gustin wrote:
Cub Driver wrote: :Why the double standard? Why the hipocracy? Why the predjudice? : It's none of the above. The United States takes the attitude that : citizenship comes with residence, not bloodline. Britain (and I think : most European countries) take the opposite view. AFAIK this is the German point of view, AIUI you're a bit out of date he people with Turkish ancestry brought up in Germany now get German citizenship as a matter of course. The RAF can presumably be more strict, although they probably could be made to accept all EU citizens. IIRC there has been a ruling by the European court that the freedom to get a job in another EU country applies to the military as well. Not heard of that; got a URL? -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse the last two letters). |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:47:30 -0500, Cub Driver wrote:
the freedom to get a job in another EU country applies to the military as well. Wow. No wonder the Brits are uneasy about their membership in the Community. My first reaction was what they would do when thousands of Turks turned up at the recruiting office ... then I remembered the Ghurkas. (And the Irish.) What does the EU say about language requriements for such employment? Nothing AFAIK. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse the last two letters). |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Dec 2003 06:36:17 -0800, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Keep in mind that there is no requirement, by the US, to "decide" on which citizenship you wish to have. A person with dual US/other citizenship can keep both citizenships for life, as far as the US is concerned. The "other" country may or may not have a requirement to "choose" or "decide", but the US does not. I don't think this has always been the case. There was a guy in the 1980s who resigned his British citizenship, so he could get US citizenship, so he could join the USAF. He was eventually dismissed from the USAF, and Britain deported him to the USA. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse the last two letters). |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:47:30 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote: the freedom to get a job in another EU country applies to the military as well. Wow. No wonder the Brits are uneasy about their membership in the Community. My first reaction was what they would do when thousands of Turks turned up at the recruiting office ... then I remembered the Ghurkas. (And the Irish.) Freedom of travel and employment and enlistment into British forces for citizens of Ireland/the Irish republic predates the EU measures by some margin, going back to the 1922 Anglo-Irish treaty. Gavin Bailey |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() For solely bureaucratic reasons, you ask for a consular birth certificate for an American born abroad. It makes things a little easier when later applying for the child's own US passport. It certainly does make life a bit easier. It heads off the chance the kid could lose his citizenship. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|