![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's none of the above. The United States takes the attitude that
citizenship comes with residence, not bloodline. Britain (and I think most European countries) take the opposite view. Britain's nationality law is primarily based on place of birth (a legal concept known as jus soli), not on ancestry (jus sanguinis). Prior to 1983, birth in the UK, would confer British nationality. Since 1983, a person born in the UK would be British only if a parent was British OR if the parent was "settled" in the UK. Settled means ordinarily resident in the UK without being subject to immigration restrictions, and this provision was implementeed in order to provide for British nationality by birth in the UK, to the children of non-British legal residents of the UK as well as the children of British citizens, but to stop visitors from coming to the UK solely for the purpose of obtaining British nationality for their children. It's believed that the Thatcher government implemented this change on the concept that there would be a flood of people from Hong Kong, coming to the UK to obtain full British nationality for their children once it was announced that Hong Kong would revert to Chinese control. There are, of course, some countries in the world whose nationality laws are solely based on ancestry, and place of birth has no bearing on whether a person has citizenship there or not. The child of two Americans, born overseas, does not automatically have American citizenship. He must spend three? years in the U.S. before his 21st? birthday in order to nail it down. Not anymore. The requirement for a person born outside the US, and who receives US citizenship through parentage, to return to the US to live for a period of time, in order to maintain his US citizenship was repealed in 1978. Now, a person who receives his US citizenship through birth abroad to US parent(s) has no requirement to ever return to the US in order to maintain citizenship. Europeans would find this bizzare. I am an Irish citizen, with an Irish passport, because my father was born in Ireland. It doesn't matter that I was born in Massachusetts. Several European countries have similar concepts. A friend of mine is an Italian citizen because his parents were born in Italy. He's also a Canadian by birth. Stephen Gallagher |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote in
: Why the double standard? Why the hipocracy? Why the predjudice? It's none of the above. The United States takes the attitude that citizenship comes with residence, not bloodline. Britain (and I think most European countries) take the opposite view. The child of two Americans, born overseas, does not automatically have American citizenship. He must spend three? years in the U.S. before his 21st? birthday in order to nail it down. Non, as others have noted. Whether an American citizen passes on American citizenship to a child born outside the US depends on the *citizen's* residence in the US. For me, born in the US and having lived in the US most of my life*, my kid Ethelred is automatically a US citizen no matter where he's born, let's hypothesize Jimbostan. But if Eggfilth remains in Jimbostan and never comes to the US, his kids born abroad will *not* be US citizens at birth, even though they are the children of an American citizen. Jim, who notes that you learn all sorts of interesting things when you marry a foreign Canadian person. *all of it, if they'd count the times when my dad was stationed in Germany as US residence -- Jim Battista A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Eastward
Bound writes Just out of curiosity. Could somebody like me - An American - No Criminal History - Single male - 19 years of age ........Join the English Royal Air Force? Would that make me a British Citizen? The English RAF doesn't exist. No. You have to have been born lucky, like me. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eastward Bound" If I wanted the join the Air Force I would join the USAF which might not be as OLD as the RAF or as rich in history but is still something great to be a part of. Sure the USAF might not have as much history but IMO has a better fleet of aircraft. Is bigger in numbers, likewise needs more volunteers to keep operating. If you want to fly antiques you might consider joining the Canadian Armed Forces. They have a fleet of antique aircraft! Almost as old as the Commemorative Air Force! ;-( Ed (retired RCAF/CAF Tech) Hoping things will improve! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Majden" wrote in message news:LkmDb.713856$6C4.570027@pd7tw1no...
"Eastward Bound" If I wanted the join the Air Force I would join the USAF which might not be as OLD as the RAF or as rich in history but is still something great to be a part of. Sure the USAF might not have as much history but IMO has a better fleet of aircraft. Is bigger in numbers, likewise needs more volunteers to keep operating. If you want to fly antiques you might consider joining the Canadian Armed Forces. They have a fleet of antique aircraft! Almost as old as the Commemorative Air Force! ;-( Ed (retired RCAF/CAF Tech) Hoping things will improve! Really? The Canadian Armed Forces enlists foreigners? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eastward Bound" Really? The Canadian Armed Forces enlists foreigners? The RCAF had many recruits from the USA prior to them entering the war! With all the cutbacks in strength today this may be more difficult. There are waiting lists for Canadian citizens these days , except for trained pilots and medical doctors! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eastward Bound wrote:
Really? The Canadian Armed Forces enlists foreigners? Not usually, but it will in a pinch. [QR&O] 6.01 – QUALIFICATIONS FOR ENROLMENT (1) In order to be eligible for enrolment in the Canadian Forces as an officer or non-commissioned member, a person must: (a) be a Canadian citizen, except that the Chief of the Defence Staff or such officer as he may designate[1] may authorize the enrolment of a citizen of another country if he is satisfied that a special need exists and that the national interest would not be prejudiced thereby; [1] Associate Deputy Minister -- Human Resources (Military) AKA ADM-HR(Mil) http://www.dnd.ca/admfincs/subjects/...006_e.asp#6.01 -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Eastward
Bound writes (Eastward Bound) wrote in message .com... Just out of curiosity. Could somebody like me - An American - No Criminal History - Single male - 19 years of age ........Join the English Royal Air Force? Would that make me a British Citizen? ~Thanks in Advance! Hey I e-mailed the careers office in London and here is the response I got: Please email rafapps-careers.mod.uk as they will be able to proceed further. Failing that contact us on 02073054278. You would need to copme along to the careers office etc to make an application as there will be a number of interviews and tests should you be eligible. Eligibility depends on a number of things. Application takes between 6-9 months or longer. Thank you for your interest. Can you imagine that!? Me a yank? In the Royal Air Force? How about that LOL... Wasn't there a film called 'A Yank in the RAF'? Mike -- M.J.Powell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|