A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Isn't lift part of drag?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 08, 09:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Isn't lift part of drag?

On Apr 25, 12:47*pm, "Peter Dohm" wrote:

There are a lot of trade offs,


Not always. There is no trade off between a model-T and a modern car.
Technology innovation allows for increased efficiency that does not
necessarily require any trade-off other than the RND time required to
develop.

-Robert
  #3  
Old April 25th 08, 09:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Isn't lift part of drag?

"Peter Dohm" wrote in
:

wrote in message
news:5d0da5e0-2006-442e-8e74-

.
..
On Apr 25, 10:55 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Apr 25, 5:23 am, es330td wrote:

Fortune magazine online has a photo essay about their new 787. On
one

page,
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/.../gallery.boein
g_dream..., they make this statement:

The Dreamliner's wingspan is 197 feet, or about 25% longer than a
similar-sized plane, which increases lift and reduces drag.

I thought that lift, in addition to causing a net upward force on
the wing, also contributes to the drag force on the wing as well.
If this is the case then increasing lift should also increase
drag. Did I misunderstand?

It could be more efficient. The Mooney wing produces more lift for
the amount of drag than a Cessna wing.

-Robert


From the original statement, it seems clear that they're
referring to the increase in efficiency that come from aspect ratio.
I wonder, now, if that increased span was made possible with the use
of composites instead of aluminum? Longer wings flex more, and
aluminum fatigues faster, I think, than composite construction. And
carbon or aramid fibers are stronger per unit weight than aluminum.

Dan

There are a lot of trade offs, and the gate spacing might also be
larger at the airports that the Dreamliner is expected to serve.
Also, IIRC, a few years ago, Boeing talking about future aircraft with
folding wing tips to overcome some of the spacing problems at the
gates. I also agree with you, that advances in materials also play a
major role.


It's not going to be that big. The widebody Busses ( A 330 and 340) are
already massive with a much larger span than the 747 so it shouldn't be
an issue.

Bertie


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wide wingspan and good lift to drag ratios Tony Piloting 6 March 13th 06 01:19 AM
8 Percent More Lift and 32 Percent Less Drag Larry Dighera Piloting 9 September 7th 05 12:02 AM
about lift and drag coefficient for cessna C-160 Grandss Piloting 9 August 15th 05 06:15 PM
Lift-to-Drag Ratio? Toks Desalu Home Built 6 November 23rd 03 10:53 PM
Drag - Anti/Drag Wires log Home Built 3 August 28th 03 07:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.