![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
I upgraded my hx4705 to WM 6.1 and it works great. ~ted/2NO |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 May, 17:50, "Paul Remde" wrote:
Hi Richard, I'm surprised an interested to see that you recommend Windows CE 6.0 for the iPAQ hx4700. *My iPAQ 4700 is still running Mobile 2003. *Most iPAQ hx4700 units shipped with that operating system. *I upgraded it to Mobile 5 and it was much, much slower. *So I "downgraded" it back to Mobile 2003. *Since then I have purchased an iPAQ 210 with Mobile 6. *It has a processor of the same speed and seems to be about the same speed or slightly slower than my iPAQ 4700. That leads me to believe that Mobile 6 is not an upgrade I want to do on my hx4700. *But that is a subjective speed estimation. *Have you compared 2 hx4700 units (one with Mobile 2003 and one with Mobile 6) running side by side? *I may upgrade to Mobile 6 is you say it is significantly faster. *I'm curious. Do you recommend Windows Mobile 6 or 6.1? Thanks, Paul Remde Paul, I have 2 X 4700s running SeeYou Mobile and GN11. One is running WM6 and the other Mobile 2003. I experimented with running them side by side with simultaneous inputs etc and can find no difference at all in speed. A very negative feature of WM6 for me is that it has no Backup/Restore facility which took me by surprise but I avoid flat battery data loss by running as much as possible off the cards. Some 4700 owners report hang ups on See You Mobile and WM6 seems to fix that. John Galloway |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 12:28*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
brianDG303 wrote: Something I've noticed is that the screens can be hard to read in bright sunlight with dark gray sunglasses and much easier with those amber sunglasses. I use "aviation" sunglasses that have an untinted bottom quarter, which improves the visibility of the PDA a lot. While they aren't prescription glasses, they do have a "bifocal" portion at the bottom that lets me focus perfectly on the PDA. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Eric, What brand and model are your sunglasses? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John,
The is a very inexpensive program called Sprite Backup Lite that is the program that was provided for free with older iPAQs. I use it on newer iPAQs that don't come with the "iPAQ Backup" utility. It sells for $19.95 and is available he http://www.spritesoftware.com/store/...roducts_id=192 I always backup the PDA to the memory card after I install the soaring program and setup the buttons, etc. I often setup PDAs for customers and I do that for them as well. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com wrote in message ... On 8 May, 17:50, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi Richard, I'm surprised an interested to see that you recommend Windows CE 6.0 for the iPAQ hx4700. My iPAQ 4700 is still running Mobile 2003. Most iPAQ hx4700 units shipped with that operating system. I upgraded it to Mobile 5 and it was much, much slower. So I "downgraded" it back to Mobile 2003. Since then I have purchased an iPAQ 210 with Mobile 6. It has a processor of the same speed and seems to be about the same speed or slightly slower than my iPAQ 4700. That leads me to believe that Mobile 6 is not an upgrade I want to do on my hx4700. But that is a subjective speed estimation. Have you compared 2 hx4700 units (one with Mobile 2003 and one with Mobile 6) running side by side? I may upgrade to Mobile 6 is you say it is significantly faster. I'm curious. Do you recommend Windows Mobile 6 or 6.1? Thanks, Paul Remde Paul, I have 2 X 4700s running SeeYou Mobile and GN11. One is running WM6 and the other Mobile 2003. I experimented with running them side by side with simultaneous inputs etc and can find no difference at all in speed. A very negative feature of WM6 for me is that it has no Backup/Restore facility which took me by surprise but I avoid flat battery data loss by running as much as possible off the cards. Some 4700 owners report hang ups on See You Mobile and WM6 seems to fix that. John Galloway |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Richard,
Thanks. It is unclear to me in your statement whether or not 6.1 is faster than 2003. If it is about the same then I think I'll stay with 2003. Thanks, Paul Remde "Richard" wrote in message ... On May 8, 9:50 am, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi Richard, I'm surprised an interested to see that you recommend Windows CE 6.0 for the iPAQ hx4700. My iPAQ 4700 is still running Mobile 2003. Most iPAQ hx4700 units shipped with that operating system. I upgraded it to Mobile 5 and it was much, much slower. So I "downgraded" it back to Mobile 2003. Since then I have purchased an iPAQ 210 with Mobile 6. It has a processor of the same speed and seems to be about the same speed or slightly slower than my iPAQ 4700. That leads me to believe that Mobile 6 is not an upgrade I want to do on my hx4700. But that is a subjective speed estimation. Have you compared 2 hx4700 units (one with Mobile 2003 and one with Mobile 6) running side by side? I may upgrade to Mobile 6 is you say it is significantly faster. I'm curious. Do you recommend Windows Mobile 6 or 6.1? Thanks, Paul Remde "Richard" wrote in message ... On May 7, 4:53 pm, Udo wrote: I am thinking of upgrading my PDA for my GNII. The display should be readable in sun light. Presently I use a1550 as primary with a 302 and the 39xx as a back up with a 302A. Maybe I should get a CAI Nav display and one good PDA. Which one? Please make recomendations. Udo Udo, I have found the Ipaq 47xx is the best without the screen protector for viewability and full backlight. I also updated the 4700 ROM to Windows CE 6.0 ROM updates: http://wm6.flyingarizona.net/ Craggy Aero is also developing an instrument. Craggy Ultimate - Screen Size 6.5 diagonal, sunlight viewable screen, with a backlight controlled by potentiometer or photo sensor, VGA 680X420 twice the screen resolution as the ClearNav. http://www.craggyaero.com/ultimate.htm Initial flight test were very favorable, no viewability problems with direct sunlight. Richardwww.craggyaero.com Paul, I have tried all the ROMS and tested. I have found that I got no improvement until I went to 6.0 and or 6.1. Mobile 5 was slower than PC2003 and 6.0 and/or 6.1 appreared the best. Richard |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 2:30*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote:
Hi Richard, Thanks. It is unclear to me in your statement whether or not 6.1 is faster than 2003. *If it is about the same then I think I'll stay with 2003. Thanks, Paul Remde "Richard" wrote in message ... On May 8, 9:50 am, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi Richard, I'm surprised an interested to see that you recommend Windows CE 6.0 for the iPAQ hx4700. My iPAQ 4700 is still running Mobile 2003. Most iPAQ hx4700 units shipped with that operating system. I upgraded it to Mobile 5 and it was much, much slower. So I "downgraded" it back to Mobile 2003. Since then I have purchased an iPAQ 210 with Mobile 6. It has a processor of the same speed and seems to be about the same speed or slightly slower than my iPAQ 4700. That leads me to believe that Mobile 6 is not an upgrade I want to do on my hx4700. But that is a subjective speed estimation. Have you compared 2 hx4700 units (one with Mobile 2003 and one with Mobile 6) running side by side? I may upgrade to Mobile 6 is you say it is significantly faster. I'm curious. Do you recommend Windows Mobile 6 or 6.1? Thanks, Paul Remde "Richard" wrote in message ... On May 7, 4:53 pm, Udo wrote: I am thinking of upgrading my PDA for my GNII. The display should be readable in sun light. Presently I use a1550 as primary with a 302 and the 39xx as a back up with a 302A. Maybe I should get a CAI Nav display and one good PDA. Which one? Please make recomendations. Udo Udo, I have found the Ipaq 47xx is the best without the screen protector for viewability and full backlight. I also updated the 4700 ROM to Windows CE 6.0 ROM updates:http://wm6.flyingarizona.net/ Craggy Aero is also developing an instrument. Craggy Ultimate - Screen Size 6.5 diagonal, sunlight viewable screen, with a backlight controlled by potentiometer or photo sensor, VGA 680X420 twice the screen resolution as the ClearNav. http://www.craggyaero.com/ultimate.htm Initial flight test were very favorable, no viewability problems with direct sunlight. Richardwww.craggyaero.com Paul, I have tried all the ROMS and tested. I have found that I got no improvement until I went to 6.0 and or 6.1. * Mobile 5 was slower than PC2003 and 6.0 and/or *6.1 appreared the best. Richard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Paul, I think 6.1 is faster. Richard www.craggyaero.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On May 8, 12:28 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: brianDG303 wrote: Something I've noticed is that the screens can be hard to read in bright sunlight with dark gray sunglasses and much easier with those amber sunglasses. I use "aviation" sunglasses that have an untinted bottom quarter, which improves the visibility of the PDA a lot. While they aren't prescription glasses, they do have a "bifocal" portion at the bottom that lets me focus perfectly on the PDA. What brand and model are your sunglasses? I believe this is where I've ordered a couple pairs (search for R424 at the site): http://www.eyesave.com/_pgid_1__index.aspx I've bought a couple elsewhere to use in my car and motorhome, so I can see the TomTom gps better, and they all seem the same. Search for "sunreaders" and you'll find more options. Amazon.com has a lot of listings, too. They also make "no-line" sunreaders, but I haven't tried them. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On 8 May, 17:50, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi Richard, I'm surprised an interested to see that you recommend Windows CE 6.0 for the iPAQ hx4700. My iPAQ 4700 is still running Mobile 2003. Most iPAQ hx4700 units shipped with that operating system. I upgraded it to Mobile 5 and it was much, much slower. So I "downgraded" it back to Mobile 2003. Since then I have purchased an iPAQ 210 with Mobile 6. It has a processor of the same speed and seems to be about the same speed or slightly slower than my iPAQ 4700. That leads me to believe that Mobile 6 is not an upgrade I want to do on my hx4700. But that is a subjective speed estimation. Have you compared 2 hx4700 units (one with Mobile 2003 and one with Mobile 6) running side by side? I may upgrade to Mobile 6 is you say it is significantly faster. I'm curious. Do you recommend Windows Mobile 6 or 6.1? Thanks, Paul Remde Paul, I have 2 X 4700s running SeeYou Mobile and GN11. One is running WM6 and the other Mobile 2003. I experimented with running them side by side with simultaneous inputs etc and can find no difference at all in speed. A very negative feature of WM6 for me is that it has no Backup/Restore facility which took me by surprise but I avoid flat battery data loss by running as much as possible off the cards. I just got a BlackJack II phone and noticed this as well, so I installed this backup softwa http://www.dotfred.net/default.htm It's free, but there are a lot of options out there if you prefer to buy something :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|