![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Officers..The Bridge at Remagen From: (Drazen Kramaric) Date: 3/31/04 11:12 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: On 26 Feb 2004 19:26:25 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote: When the troops of the 9th armored division reached the bridge at Remaagen on March 7th they stopped undecided what to do. General William Hoge saw the bridge standing aand ordered it to be taken with the East end of the bridge secured. Lt. Karl Timmermann led the charge takig the bridge and setting up a perimeter line of skernishers on the Eastern side. When ordered to take the bridge troops obeyed the commands of their officers instantly and obediently. No debates. No second opinions. Just immediate action. It is how wars are won. Actually, according to William Breuer's "Storming Hitler's Rhine", Timmerman's men hesitated, when Major Deveers tried to cheer them up, he was cursed back about what he could have done with his damned bridge. It took some prodding until men finally rose and followed their lieutnant over the bridge. Drax I know men who were there and they tell the story as I have told it. Also there were cameramen there who recorded the assault as I have told it. Brauer wasn't there and knows nothing about it. Once again Art comes up short when his story is examined against available hisorical accounts: "Timmermann saw that the bridge was damaged (see the picture at right) but passable. He called the platoon leaders together and gave the plan for crossing the bridge. The men hesitated - they were tired and it looked like certain death." www2.gasou.edu/facstaff/etmcmull/REMAGEN.htm (Account from a US Army officer who participated in the Remagen operation, with the first AAA battalion to arive to defend the bridghead) Sounds like the account Breuer related is a lot closer to the truth than the one Art recalss--but heck, given that Art can't even remember the fact that National Guard units were in the thick of the combat throughout the ETO, this comes as little surprise. Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" writes:
Throughout Pacific war, Japanese managed to fight far more stubbornly without air cover. Stubbornly yes, intelligently no. By 1944 the weaknesses of the Japanese fighting methods was well understood and they took horrible casualties to little effect. It does boggle the mind rather, doesn't it. I believe it was only in late 1944, at Palau (do I have that right? The unnecessary invasion?) that the Japanese commander managed to persuade GHQ to allow him to fight a guerilla battle rather than suicide charges - in order to prolong resistance for as long as possible. This became the accepted way to fight after that, despite suicide charges carried out at times after that. All in all though, a great waste of life on mostly the Japanese side. -- G Hassenpflug * IJN & JMSDF equipment/history fan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A problem in the Military ? | Nick Jade | Military Aviation | 54 | March 15th 04 07:59 PM |
Bridge at Remagen? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 18 | February 9th 04 05:24 PM |
Why is Stealth So Important? | James Dandy | Military Aviation | 148 | January 20th 04 04:17 PM |
Two programs help officers join JAG Corps | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 19th 03 11:33 PM |
Question about the Arado... | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 20 | August 4th 03 03:00 AM |