![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....and since we're spinning a bit off-topic, here's an update on the
whole "new battery technology" front: http://gas2.org/2009/01/21/silicon-n...hell-approach/ Having batteries store 3x the current charge of the Antares (or the same charge for 1/3rd of the weight) sounds nice! Peering into my (cludy, amateur) crystal ball, I'd bet money that these cells are on the market in 3 years. The global economic climate isn't favorable for new entreprenurial investments; but at the same time there's plenty of excess factory capacity around the world right now, lots of unemployed people to work in the factories, and batteries are going to be in high demand for the foreseeable future. Take care, --Noel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 2:59*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
...and since we're spinning a bit off-topic, here's an update on the whole "new battery technology" front: http://gas2.org/2009/01/21/silicon-n...ake-two-the-co... Having batteries store 3x the current charge of the Antares (or the same charge for 1/3rd of the weight) sounds nice! *Peering into my (cludy, amateur) crystal ball, I'd bet money that these cells are on the market in 3 years. *The global economic climate isn't favorable for new entreprenurial investments; but at the same time there's plenty of excess factory capacity around the world right now, lots of unemployed people to work in the factories, and batteries are going to be in high demand for the foreseeable future. Take care, --Noel Along those lines, I'm very excited about Eestor. I hope they can produce what they say they can. The power-to-weight ratio would be a huge advantage for electric aircraft. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip it's probably not where the real action is going to be in the
future /snip Certainly not the near future! 2009 Nationals registration counts as of 27 Feb -- 15M: 49 18M: 12 And I'd go to the 15M nats too (I have a glider that will do both) were it not on the east coast! ..02NO |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 4:15*pm, Tuno wrote:
snip it's probably not where the real action is going to be in the future /snip Certainly not the near future! 2009 Nationals registration counts as of 27 Feb -- * * 15M: 49 * * 18M: 12 And I'd go to the 15M nats too (I have a glider that will do both) were it not on the east coast! .02NO Agreed! That's why I'm smack in the middle of those 49 15Ms! But look at what is being built right now, and project that forward a few years.... Of course, that just means it'll be more fun to beat the snotty-nosed 18m ships with a ratty old 15m, winglets (draglets) be damned! Is this a great sport or what! Kirk 66 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform without flaps? It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:55 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. It is an optimized compromise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The DuckHawk wing IS optimised for high speed and low speed flight. A
tremendous amount of effort went into creating a wing that would work well at slow speeds with the flaps down, and also work very well at high speeds with flaps up. Additionally, Greg did a lot of analysis of how to maximize the cross country speed. To simplify greatly, the result was to climb really fast and run really fast. That actually simplified things a little with the flaps. Basically, one would fly with flaps down while climbing and then transition directly to flaps up and run fast to find the next thermal. Intermediate speeds and flap positions were not that necessary. So, the flaps up/high speed case and the flaps down/ low speed point were optimized. Of course, in the real world, there might be times when you don't want to do exactly what the theory says, so last I heard, the flaps will just have 3 positions: up, zero, and down (a landing position was discussed, but I don't know if it is incorporated). Quite a lot of effort was also made to give a fairly wide performance range to each position. So, while it is optimized for run and climb, there won't be a big hole in the middle of the polar. Doug T. On Feb 28, 6:46*am, Bob Kuykendall wrote: On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit. Thanks, Bob K. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 11:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
wrote: It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform without flaps? It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Climb and glide scenario has been going out of favor as optimum strategy for many years now in favor of extended glide techniques that optomise cross country speed by minimizing circling and using long periods of time in the mid to high range to maximize speed made good. This requires a glider with excellent performance through the whole speed range which likely will mean that very low speed and or very high speed are less favored. Optomising for really high speeds is great for ridge and wave, but not much use other than final glide in most soaring environments. It is good to see guys like Gred and Bob giving it a shot. FWIW UH |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 12:43*pm, wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: wrote: It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform without flaps? It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high speed flight. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Climb and glide scenario has been going out of favor as optimum strategy for many years now in favor of extended glide techniques that optomise cross country speed by minimizing circling and using long periods of time in the mid to high range to maximize speed made good. This requires a glider with excellent performance through the whole speed range which likely will mean that very low speed and or very high speed are less favored. Optomising for really high speeds is great for ridge and wave, but not much use other than final glide in most soaring environments. It is good to see guys like Gred and Bob giving it a shot. FWIW UH Good point Hank. Cruise speeds have been coming down, though an analogous set of principles apply. Still a lighter, smaller airframe should be able to add a 5-10 knots in cruise speed and you'd think they could design around that. 9B 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fiberglass cloth weight vs 'finished' weight | Fred the Red Shirt | Home Built | 12 | April 5th 08 04:24 PM |
Glider Weight/Wing Loading and determing speed for best L/D for a given weight | 65E | Soaring | 3 | January 26th 06 09:26 PM |
Flight Level and a half | Scott Draper | Instrument Flight Rules | 56 | October 5th 05 02:40 AM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |