A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 09, 08:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
noel.wade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 681
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

....and since we're spinning a bit off-topic, here's an update on the
whole "new battery technology" front:

http://gas2.org/2009/01/21/silicon-n...hell-approach/

Having batteries store 3x the current charge of the Antares (or the
same charge for 1/3rd of the weight) sounds nice! Peering into my
(cludy, amateur) crystal ball, I'd bet money that these cells are on
the market in 3 years. The global economic climate isn't favorable
for new entreprenurial investments; but at the same time there's
plenty of excess factory capacity around the world right now, lots of
unemployed people to work in the factories, and batteries are going to
be in high demand for the foreseeable future.

Take care,

--Noel

  #2  
Old February 27th 09, 10:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

On Feb 27, 2:59*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
...and since we're spinning a bit off-topic, here's an update on the
whole "new battery technology" front:

http://gas2.org/2009/01/21/silicon-n...ake-two-the-co...

Having batteries store 3x the current charge of the Antares (or the
same charge for 1/3rd of the weight) sounds nice! *Peering into my
(cludy, amateur) crystal ball, I'd bet money that these cells are on
the market in 3 years. *The global economic climate isn't favorable
for new entreprenurial investments; but at the same time there's
plenty of excess factory capacity around the world right now, lots of
unemployed people to work in the factories, and batteries are going to
be in high demand for the foreseeable future.

Take care,

--Noel


Along those lines, I'm very excited about Eestor. I hope they can
produce what they say they can. The power-to-weight ratio would be a
huge advantage for electric aircraft.
  #3  
Old February 27th 09, 10:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tuno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 640
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

snip it's probably not where the real action is going to be in the
future /snip

Certainly not the near future!

2009 Nationals registration counts as of 27 Feb --

15M: 49
18M: 12

And I'd go to the 15M nats too (I have a glider that will do both)
were it not on the east coast!

..02NO
  #4  
Old February 27th 09, 11:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected][_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

On Feb 27, 4:15*pm, Tuno wrote:
snip it's probably not where the real action is going to be in the
future /snip

Certainly not the near future!

2009 Nationals registration counts as of 27 Feb --

* * 15M: 49
* * 18M: 12

And I'd go to the 15M nats too (I have a glider that will do both)
were it not on the east coast!

.02NO


Agreed! That's why I'm smack in the middle of those 49 15Ms!

But look at what is being built right now, and project that forward a
few years....

Of course, that just means it'll be more fun to beat the snotty-nosed
18m ships with a ratty old 15m, winglets (draglets) be damned!

Is this a great sport or what!

Kirk
66
  #6  
Old February 28th 09, 05:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:

My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high
speed flight.


Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit.

Thanks, Bob K.
  #7  
Old February 28th 09, 06:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Greg Arnold[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:55 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:

My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high
speed flight.


Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit.

Thanks, Bob K.



It is an optimized compromise.
  #8  
Old February 28th 09, 02:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

The DuckHawk wing IS optimised for high speed and low speed flight. A
tremendous amount of effort went into creating a wing that would work
well at slow speeds with the flaps down, and also work very well at
high speeds with flaps up.

Additionally, Greg did a lot of analysis of how to maximize the cross
country speed. To simplify greatly, the result was to climb really
fast and run really fast. That actually simplified things a little
with the flaps. Basically, one would fly with flaps down while
climbing and then transition directly to flaps up and run fast to find
the next thermal. Intermediate speeds and flap positions were not
that necessary. So, the flaps up/high speed case and the flaps down/
low speed point were optimized. Of course, in the real world, there
might be times when you don't want to do exactly what the theory says,
so last I heard, the flaps will just have 3 positions: up, zero, and
down (a landing position was discussed, but I don't know if it is
incorporated). Quite a lot of effort was also made to give a fairly
wide performance range to each position. So, while it is optimized
for run and climb, there won't be a big hole in the middle of the
polar.

Doug T.

On Feb 28, 6:46*am, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:

My understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high
speed flight.


Eric, that kinda stretches the meaning of the word "optimize" a bit.

Thanks, Bob K.


  #9  
Old February 28th 09, 08:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

On Feb 27, 11:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
wrote:
It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal
as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform
without flaps?


It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential
to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My
understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high
speed flight.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


Climb and glide scenario has been going out of favor as optimum
strategy for many years now in favor of extended glide techniques that
optomise cross country speed by minimizing circling and using long
periods of time in the mid to high range to maximize speed made good.
This requires a glider with excellent performance through the whole
speed range which likely will mean that very low speed and or very
high speed are less favored.
Optomising for really high speeds is great for ridge and wave, but not
much use other than final glide in most soaring environments.
It is good to see guys like Gred and Bob giving it a shot.
FWIW
UH
  #10  
Old February 28th 09, 11:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default 52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight.

On Feb 28, 12:43*pm, wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:55*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:



wrote:
It would seem that the Duckhawk would have more international appeal
as a Standard class (15m no flaps) ship - wonder how it would perform
without flaps?


It sure wouldn't need that 200 knot Vne, would it? Flaps are essential
to get the wide speed range that makes the the 200 knot Vne useful. My
understanding is the airfoil is optimized for climbing and very high
speed flight.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more


* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


Climb and glide scenario has been going out of favor as optimum
strategy for many years now in favor of extended glide techniques that
optomise cross country speed by minimizing circling and using long
periods of time in the mid to high range to maximize speed made good.
This requires a glider with excellent performance through the whole
speed range which likely will mean that very low speed and or very
high speed are less favored.
Optomising for really high speeds is great for ridge and wave, but not
much use other than final glide in most soaring environments.
It is good to see guys like Gred and Bob giving it a shot.
FWIW
UH


Good point Hank. Cruise speeds have been coming down, though an
analogous set of principles apply. Still a lighter, smaller airframe
should be able to add a 5-10 knots in cruise speed and you'd think
they could design around that.

9B

9B
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fiberglass cloth weight vs 'finished' weight Fred the Red Shirt Home Built 12 April 5th 08 04:24 PM
Glider Weight/Wing Loading and determing speed for best L/D for a given weight 65E Soaring 3 January 26th 06 09:26 PM
Flight Level and a half Scott Draper Instrument Flight Rules 56 October 5th 05 02:40 AM
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance R.T. Owning 22 July 6th 04 08:04 AM
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight Flyhighdave Soaring 13 January 14th 04 04:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.