A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Spin recovery vs tail design



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12th 09, 03:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Spin recovery vs tail design

Darryl Ramm wrote:
On May 11, 3:19 pm, Andreas Maurer wrote:


I guess pretty many pilots here have flown the ASW-20 - recovering it
with setting 4 (zhermal setting) with a medium to rearward CG ca take
up to 2 turns, but with flaps 1 (fully negative) recovery takes at
maximum 0.75 turns.

Bye
Andreas


Not surprising at all - it would surprise me if anybody really wants
to teach this. Lets see -

- A desire to teach a standardized recovery
- Don't distract people with grabbing for a handle while under stress
(or if not stress just physically being thrown around a little)
- Likelyhood of grabbing the wrong handle (esp. if transitioning from
another ship) and just moving it (i.e. opening full spoilers)
- With full negative flap what happens to increased likelihood of
entering another/reverse spin if the pilot recovers too "hard"?


Wouldn't the chance of another/reverse spin be even greater in a
positive flap setting if the pilot recovers too "hard"? What I noticed
in my ASW 20 and my ASH 26 E is going to negative flap immediately
stopped the spin and there is nothing to "recover" from except a "mild"
nose down attitude. I haven't tried waiting more than a half turn;
perhaps waiting a full turn or more might be different, but I'm only
concerned about immediate recovery attempts.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
  #2  
Old May 12th 09, 01:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
sisu1a
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 569
Default Spin recovery vs tail design

Interesting noone has mentiond flap setting yet - setting the flaps
to
negative is by far the best way to quicken up the spin recovery.


Actually flap settings are touched on in my first $0.02 I pitched in 9
posts ago... although I make no mention of negative flaps I simply
state that retracting them hastens the recovery process in it, and
that it was probably not specific to V tails... The Fowler flaps on my
Sisu had 0-20 deg, but no neg... but- flap setting as a concept was at
least mentioned

Feeling like I only pitched in $0.04 (OK, maybe $0.05), but for an
actual price of $0.06,
-Paul

  #3  
Old May 12th 09, 01:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Maurer[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Spin recovery vs tail design

On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:07:29 -0700 (PDT), sisu1a
wrote:

Actually flap settings are touched on in my first $0.02 I pitched in 9
posts ago...


Hey... here in Europe we only move flaps positive and flaps negative,
we don't retract them... we don't even know these fowler type things
(apart from the ones on this Blanik thing)...


although I make no mention of negative flaps I simply
state that retracting them hastens the recovery process in it, and
that it was probably not specific to V tails... The Fowler flaps on my
Sisu had 0-20 deg, but no neg... but- flap setting as a concept was at
least mentioned




Let's wait tll the first one points out to retract the Schempp-Hirth
type airbrakes due to structural reasons...

Bye
Andreas
  #4  
Old May 12th 09, 01:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 256
Default Spin recovery vs tail design

Andreas Maurer wrote:

Interesting noone has mentiond flap setting yet - setting the flaps to
negative is by far the best way to quicken up the spin recovery.


It may quicken up the recovery, but JAR-22 requires a sailplane to
recover with any flap setting.
  #5  
Old May 12th 09, 01:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Maurer[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Spin recovery vs tail design

On Tue, 12 May 2009 01:25:24 +0200, John Smith
wrote:


It may quicken up the recovery, but JAR-22 requires a sailplane to
recover with any flap setting.


Indeed - but many gliders who are still popular were designed before
JAR-22.
I'm always amazed about how much easier the ASW-27 handles in this
regard compared to a, say, ASW-20.

Bye
Andreas
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spin Recovery Training Before First Solo? [email protected] Piloting 16 September 9th 07 04:48 AM
Spin Recovery Training Before First Solo? [email protected] Piloting 1 September 5th 07 10:51 PM
SR22 Spin Recovery gwengler Piloting 9 September 24th 04 08:31 AM
inverted spin recovery explanation Alan Wood Aerobatics 18 August 19th 04 04:32 PM
Edelweiss - Spin recovery procedures Uri Saovray Soaring 7 March 15th 04 01:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.