![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message
... In message , Jackie Mulheron writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" writes: Sure, but it means you get to pay for them (and most of the support and TacDev is way down south, Och I'm sure it won't be as bad as the constant Defence Reviews and reorganisations we have in the UK at the behest of the Treasury. It'll be worse for both sides. Well Phil Hunt seems to think otherwise and is posting some good detailed stuff. You don't think the MOD is a model of efficiency do you? I heard a tale (was a guy in the RAF as well) who said that the fly past of Tornados at the Jubilee was backed up with another equal number so unconfident were they of their ability to stay airworthy. Inspirational stuff along with a Tescos style supply system. Or is it Morrisons? meaning you need to pay again to duplicate it if it's a hostile split). Balkanisation isn't usually a good idea (I mean, _look_ at the Balkans - would _you_ want to live there?) This isn't the Balkans. More sedate like the "splits" with Canada et al. 'Sedate'? The poster who got me into this argument was claiming that Scotland would get what it wanted or start throwing Tridents around. Well he isn't called "Auld" Bob because he's a sprightly adolescent. He's pulling your chain (I hope he's pulling your chain!!!) and I doubt he will be leading the movement for national liberation anyway. A peaceful, negotiated separation would mean significant loss of capability on both sides, but could be managed to minimise the pain. But the scenario presented was simple thuggery. It could also mean they just keep the institutions and have them as a shared resource with some designated units and bases under some form of sovereign control. Sure it could be worked out. Probably please the Marshalls and Admirals as well as the two governments avoid annoying each other with calling for those incessant reviews. The idea of a British Isles Balkans is just the fantasy hyperbole passing for unionist political propaganda. Why? Two elements of a 'former nation-state', one breaking away with significant expertise and strong will, another determined to crush this 'minority revolt' having most of the big guns (and please, consider something called the Permissive Action Link) And unlikely to happen. Ghandi admitted that it was because the British were essentially decent that they accepted the inevitability of Indian independence. Most of the countries becoming independent from London government did so peacefully and with agreement. But their not as "interesting" to read about as the the others. And in most of those other cases the violence was usually an internal one which the British found themselves having to get through. It's a situation to be devoutly avoided. If Scotland really wants to break free, then I have strong reasons for both sides to sort the issue out peacefully. And there's no reason to believe it won't be. But it was not I that advanced the notion of "if we don't get what we want, we just nuke London". Again that's just Bob. It would be a bit difficult getting to that point in the first place what with having to storm Faslane, make sure the subs don't slip out and have the people to operate them or know the codes to fire them. (Why am I even considering such a ridiculous scenario???!!!) Most countries go their separate ways quite amicably. It's just that their stories don't make good movies. Quite so. And as the son of a mother from Aberdeen and a father from Perth, I'd devoutly hope that the separation would be as painless and efficient as possible. Just look up the Commonwealth countries in their site and the names of most won't spring out as ones who had a "War" of independence. Where there was conflict it was invariably cock up by the British in handling an angsty or belligerent minority - Orangemen/Republicans in Ireland, Communist Chinese in Malaysia, Hindus/Muslims in India, Mau Mau in Kenya or white settlers/black nationalists in Rhodesia. But that doesn't change the fact that some hard choices would have to be made and the negotiations would get downright "frank and forthright" at times.. Oh they'll probably be a few cards kept close to the chest but which Scotland is willing to throw away. Could end up with keeping the present organisation on a shared basis, or have leased or sovereign bases a la Cyprus, maybe do away with it all and let London do it a la Iceland. Nukes may be the sticking point but not that Scotland wants to keep them. Careful there - the US might remember the Auld Alliance and decide that Scotland is close enough to France to become part of the Axis of Evil. Trying to auction nuclear warheads might get some unwelcome gatecrashers (besides, most of the customers are short on manners, and might decide that it was easier to kill other bidders than match their price, then the auctioneer gets hit in the crossfire, and where's your profit then?) Be a tad dangerous hitting us in the crossfire when we still have the capability of delivering the goods for free. Deliver them to whom? Scotland doesn't have a DSP network or any BMEWS stations. You know for sure you just got hit, you have the mushroom clouds to prove it, but whose hand did the deed and where should you retaliate? How could they do that when we haven't sold the good to "them" yet? For that matter, according to some you've just auctioned off some nuclear weapons to the highest bidder: how can you be sure they didn't just use you as a live-fire test of their new toys (and to avoid having the cheque cashed?) We'd cash it first and do an Israel Dirty Harry style - "Did we only have five to sell you or was there a sixth?" By the way I was being facetious with the last comment. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:29:57 +0100, "Robert Peffers"
wrote: Oirish! ye soondit mair lik aa Sootheron til me. Aiblins yo maun bi an Inglis Oirisher? DARFC Just a pur wee English lad here (though my Mam is Danish). Nothing but respect for the lads north of the Border though (and not just becasue my Boss is one of them). Peter Kemp |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Kemp" wrote in message ... On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:29:57 +0100, "Robert Peffers" wrote: Oirish! ye soondit mair lik aa Sootheron til me. Aiblins yo maun bi an Inglis Oirisher? DARFC Just a pur wee English lad here (though my Mam is Danish). Nothing but respect for the lads north of the Border though (and not just becasue my Boss is one of them). Peter Kemp Frae Auld Bob Peffers: The first thing to learn about scs is that our favourite sport is leg-pulling. We never knowingly miss a chance. You are welcome here and we don't really care where you come from. It can be quite funny for a while when new posters turn up to troll Scots, for many of the regulars here are from all over the World. More of them in fact than native Scots. Sometimes it is a bit strange for humour in different countries can fly over the heads of others. So, in Scots, "Cam oan awa ben the hoose an bide a wee", (Come on it and stay a while). -- Aefauldlie, (Scots word for Honestly), Robert, (Auld Bob), Peffers, Kelty, Fife, Scotland, (UK). Web Site, "The Eck's Files":- http://www.peffers50.freeserve.co.uk E-Mail:- (Tak oot the wee dug tae send e-mail). --- Aa ootgannin screivings maun hae nae wee beasties wi thaim.. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 27/06/2004 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Kemp" wrote in message ... On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:29:57 +0100, "Robert Peffers" wrote: Oirish! ye soondit mair lik aa Sootheron til me. Aiblins yo maun bi an Inglis Oirisher? DARFC Just a pur wee English lad here (though my Mam is Danish). Nothing but respect for the lads north of the Border though (and not just becasue my Boss is one of them). Peter Kemp I'm intrigued. What possible other reason could there be? A W-S |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 01:14:55 +1200, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
wrote: "Peter Kemp" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:29:57 +0100, "Robert Peffers" wrote: Oirish! ye soondit mair lik aa Sootheron til me. Aiblins yo maun bi an Inglis Oirisher? DARFC Just a pur wee English lad here (though my Mam is Danish). Nothing but respect for the lads north of the Border though (and not just becasue my Boss is one of them). Peter Kemp I'm intrigued. What possible other reason could there be? The sheer mastery of the fast paced but brutal sport of curling, what else ;-) No, to be honest, after a few nights on the Isle of Bute one year sipping pints of heavy as the sun set across the I've never had a bad word (well, not a serious one) to say for the Scots or thier land. Great place, great beer. Peter Kemp |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Peter Kemp
writes: On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:07:21 +0100, (phil hunt) wrote: There's recently been speculation in the media that UK defence cuts ewill result in some or all of Scotland's infantry regiments being disbanded[1]. If Scotland became an independent state, what sort of armed forces should it have -- if you were appointed Scottish minister of defence, what would you do? 4-6 fisheries protection vessels, alsae guid for keeping the damn English away fra the wee oil platferms. one of them Brewery ships sounds like a guid idee an all, fer keeping the troops mora...morae.....spirits oop. Now, are we goona join that Nato thingie or not? If we are, then a coople of battalians of infantree shood werk well fer yon peeckeepin roll, and we can gaw down and smack the damn Sassenachs occasionaly an all. A few MPAs (again 4-6) for long range patrol, plus C2 of any SAR work, plus a dozen Merlins for both land and naval work (SAR, troop transposrt, resupply). If Bonnie auld Scotland did ever split, I see them (if you haven't guessed I'm not a native Scottish speaker) more as an Ireland (minimal forces except for peacekeping and EEZ patrol), than a Sweden (extremely large and competant forces for the size of economy and population). Hell, why not an Israel? Bigger population and no occupation commitments...unless you include parts of Lanarkshire and the Glesga Strip. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:39 +0100, "Jackie Mulheron"
wrote: In article , Peter Kemp writes: If Bonnie auld Scotland did ever split, I see them (if you haven't guessed I'm not a native Scottish speaker) more as an Ireland (minimal forces except for peacekeping and EEZ patrol), than a Sweden (extremely large and competant forces for the size of economy and population). Hell, why not an Israel? Bigger population and no occupation commitments...unless you include parts of Lanarkshire and the Glesga Strip. Small problem - to be an Israel you need to be beating the crap out of the indiginous population (any Picts left?) and of couse get Billions from the US to subsidise it all. I don't see the Scottish lobby having a lot of power in Congress at the moment. Peter Kemp |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:23:35 -0400, Peter Kemp wrote:
4-6 fisheries protection vessels, alsae guid for keeping the damn English away fra the wee oil platferms. Makes sense. A few MPAs (again 4-6) for long range patrol, plus C2 of any SAR work, plus a dozen Merlins for both land and naval work (SAR, troop transposrt, resupply). What're MPAs? If Bonnie auld Scotland did ever split, I see them (if you haven't guessed I'm not a native Scottish speaker) more as an Ireland (minimal forces except for peacekeping and EEZ patrol), than a Sweden (extremely large and competant forces for the size of economy and population). That's probably what would happen. Though bear in mind Sweden spends a lower proportion of GDP on defense than the UK does. The MoD doesn't seem to be into value for money. Why do they employ more civil servants than soldiers? -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Chinook: stalwart of armed forces air operations | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 08:14 PM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
Cutting the UK armed forces | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 7 | October 25th 03 05:08 PM |
Gw Bush toy doll in flightgear - now available | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 100 | September 25th 03 12:13 PM |