![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "a" wrote in message ... On Aug 2, 9:24 am, "Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote: The idea isn't to get a log book entry, folks, the idea is to demonstrate you know what you're doing to an objective observer. Don't waste the opportunity. Exactly! I always take any pressure off my instructor by mentioning right at the start that I don't care how long the process takes (air or ground). I also always insist on hood time. Vaughn |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote:
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . Sylvain wrote: However, there are a couple of advantages with the Wings program; for one thing, it is preferable for the CFI, for liability reasons; Setting aside the fact that in the U.S. anyone can sue anyone else for just about any reason, I am unaware of any FAA regulation that would make a CFI responsible for the actions of a pilot they had signed off on their BFR. It would be helpful if you could cite case law or regulations that support your claim. The CFI isn't responsible for the actions of a non-student pilot, The post by Sylvain appears to have claimed otherwise. The remainder of your post deals with the responsibility of a CFI with respect to the CFI's actions - not the actions of another person. That was a given - at least for me. So the bottom line is if the CFI is doing everything he is required to do, he has nothing to worry about if a pilot he gave a BFR screws up. Quite. My point of objection to Sylvain's post is that rumors and assertions have a habit of becoming "fact". If CFIs started believing that the FAA could hold them responsible for the actions of pilots who they passed on BFRs, I have no doubt it could seriously impact aviation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. . "Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote: "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . Sylvain wrote: However, there are a couple of advantages with the Wings program; for one thing, it is preferable for the CFI, for liability reasons; Setting aside the fact that in the U.S. anyone can sue anyone else for just about any reason, I am unaware of any FAA regulation that would make a CFI responsible for the actions of a pilot they had signed off on their BFR. It would be helpful if you could cite case law or regulations that support your claim. The CFI isn't responsible for the actions of a non-student pilot, The post by Sylvain appears to have claimed otherwise. The remainder of your post deals with the responsibility of a CFI with respect to the CFI's actions - not the actions of another person. That was a given - at least for me. I believe the word was "liability" and not "responsibility", and this is more or less correct. For each and every pilot a CFI provides a BFR, that CFI can be subject to being called on the carpet by FSDO, and such things do happen. In other words, his backside could very much be on the line. That doesn't mean he's responsible for each and everything that pilot does for the next 2 years, it just means it is a potential liability. And while yes, the CFI is only responsible for his own actions in regards to the BFR, I don't know of any CFIs who are so sure of themselves and their record keeping abilities that they wouldn't be worried about the experience. It's kinda like getting audited by the IRS. It's not something you look forward to even if you have never cheated on your taxes. So the bottom line is if the CFI is doing everything he is required to do, he has nothing to worry about if a pilot he gave a BFR screws up. Quite. My point of objection to Sylvain's post is that rumors and assertions have a habit of becoming "fact". If CFIs started believing that the FAA could hold them responsible for the actions of pilots who they passed on BFRs, I have no doubt it could seriously impact aviation. I can't really see that happening even on the extremely outside chance that a usenet post could possibly start some sort of wildfire rumor across the aviation community. There's no shortage of CFIs, and a good number of the ones who are out there are already willing to work for slave wages, and many of them don't seem to be too concerned about liability. Case in point, let's say a CFI gives someone instruction in their own aircraft and both of them manage to turn the airplane into scrap. The insurance company can very well say that since the CFI was performing professional services in the aircraft, it was being used for commercial purposes and therefore they aren't going to pay. How many CFIs do you know carry personal liability insurance for just such instances? I know a lot of CFIs and I don't know of any that do. Every CFI that signs off on a BFR should be worried about it coming back to haunt them. That exactly why they should be doing at least the minimum required by the FARs, if not far exceeding them, and documenting all of their actions. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:33:25 GMT, Mike wrote:
How many CFIs do you know carry personal liability insurance for just such instances? At a theoretical $80.00 per BFR, the CFI could loose money every year on liability insurance. In reality, my six CFIs were all young and basically had no assets, which could be considered pretty good protection against being sued. -- Dallas |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dallas" wrote in message ... On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:33:25 GMT, Mike wrote: How many CFIs do you know carry personal liability insurance for just such instances? At a theoretical $80.00 per BFR, the CFI could loose money every year on liability insurance. In reality, my six CFIs were all young and basically had no assets, which could be considered pretty good protection against being sued. It doesn't matter, it doesn't happen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
hey Bob, don't look. There are no wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | May 19th 08 04:43 PM |
Sea Wings pin? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 15 | September 23rd 06 06:49 PM |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |
FS SGS 1-35 Wings | MHende6388 | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 03 02:06 AM |
What it took to get wings in WW II. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 29 | July 16th 03 07:42 AM |