![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 5:47 pm, wrote:
If the starter solenoid is at the battery the only time the high current conductor is live is when cranking - and virtually all the rest of the loads can be handled by a "main switch". Except that you still have a substantial live cable coming into the cockpit, a hazard that can't be disconnected in flight if something goes wrong. And that substantial cable and its substantial switch could also end up costing and weighing more than a $25 contactor and $3 master switch. The charging circuit is the only part of the wiring that can get tricky - and there are ways around that too. Yeah, but you have no control over it if it's wired directly to the battery as in an automobile. Regulators are known to fail and get the alternator working overtime (I've had it happen in a boat) and burn things out. An alternator switch (actually, a regulator controls switch) and alt output breaker make things much safer. There are ways to save cost and weight, but the electrical system is not a good place to do it. Dan |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan-Annie Dridiger" wrote in message
... On Nov 1, 5:47 pm, wrote: If the starter solenoid is at the battery the only time the high current conductor is live is when cranking - and virtually all the rest of the loads can be handled by a "main switch". Except that you still have a substantial live cable coming into the cockpit, a hazard that can't be disconnected in flight if something goes wrong. And that substantial cable and its substantial switch could also end up costing and weighing more than a $25 contactor and $3 master switch. A lot of that can be true or false with nearly equal ease. First, assuming that we are only talking about light single engine aircraft with the battery mounted in the fusalage, rather than in one of the wings, then a little depends on whether the battery is at the same end of the fuselage as the engine. Personally, I would be inclined to protect the starting circuit with a cartridge fuse as need the battery as practical. The next question is what loads need to be protected in what manner, and the only one that really needs a hefty contactor is the starting motor. After that is the main output of the alternator/generator which sould be greater than the combination of all loads other than the starter. Personally, I would be inclined to protect the starting circuit with a cartridge fuse, sized to protect the CABLE and placed as near the battery as practical. I would also do the same thing for the cable from the battery to the master switch/breaker/contactor and would further protect the main output cable from the alternator/generator with an in-line or cartridge fuse as near the alternator/generator as practical. Those three fuses should be sufficient to protect the main cabling from the power sources to the distribution points, where the breakers could provide the specific circuit protection. Protection, and switching, of the field circuit is a great idea--if the type of regulator in use makes it practical. Otherwise, it might be necessary to switch the output with a switch or contactor. The charging circuit is the only part of the wiring that can get tricky - and there are ways around that too. Yeah, but you have no control over it if it's wired directly to the battery as in an automobile. Regulators are known to fail and get the alternator working overtime (I've had it happen in a boat) and burn things out. An alternator switch (actually, a regulator controls switch) and alt output breaker make things much safer. There are ways to save cost and weight, but the electrical system is not a good place to do it. Dan Very good point, and this thread started with a discussion of a master contactor that would supposedly draw nearly an amp for its own coil current--which seemed like an outrageously large power and heat dissipation! So, it the starter uses the Bendix type inertial engagement mechanism, I would be inclined to use a remote contactor near the battery and splurge for a more efficient main contactor sized for the non-starting loads. Peter |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:58:26 -0800 (PST), Nathan-Annie Dridiger
wrote: On Nov 1, 5:47 pm, wrote: If the starter solenoid is at the battery the only time the high current conductor is live is when cranking - and virtually all the rest of the loads can be handled by a "main switch". Except that you still have a substantial live cable coming into the cockpit, a hazard that can't be disconnected in flight if something goes wrong. And that substantial cable and its substantial switch could also end up costing and weighing more than a $25 contactor and $3 master switch. The charging circuit is the only part of the wiring that can get tricky - and there are ways around that too. Yeah, but you have no control over it if it's wired directly to the battery as in an automobile. Regulators are known to fail and get the alternator working overtime (I've had it happen in a boat) and burn things out. An alternator switch (actually, a regulator controls switch) and alt output breaker make things much safer. There are ways to save cost and weight, but the electrical system is not a good place to do it. Dan Define "substantial" and a fuse or breaker WILL disconnect it if something goes wrong. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the solenoid is hooked directly to the battery, then it will
be energized by applying a ground to the control terminal. That's just the coil current - an amp? I must be missing something about the high current cable coming into the cockpit. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/hhrad2.JPG Even at zero knots the FUN meter appears to be on high - that's quite an aeroplane! Ron has been commemorating his Flybaby in (internet) print for twenty years to my positive knowledge. What a marriage made in Heaven! Brian W |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:24:33 -0600, brian whatcott
wrote: Jim Logajan wrote: Ron Wanttaja wrote: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/hhrad2.JPG Even at zero knots the FUN meter appears to be on high - that's quite an aeroplane! Ron has been commemorating his Flybaby in (internet) print for twenty years to my positive knowledge. What a marriage made in Heaven! Brian W who could forget N500F's annual maintenance :-) priceless. Stealth Pilot |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 11:08 pm, wrote:
Define "substantial" and a fuse or breaker WILL disconnect it if something goes wrong. And if that fuse or breaker is in the cockpit, you still have a live feed to it even if it trips. If it's next to the battery somewhere else, you can't shut it off, reset it or replace it in flight. Dan |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 11:46 pm, cavelamb wrote:
If the solenoid is hooked directly to the battery, then it will be energized by applying a ground to the control terminal. That's just the coil current - an amp? I must be missing something about the high current cable coming into the cockpit. If you had no contactor and had instead a big switch on the panel, you have a large wire coming into the cockpit. That large wire goes directly to the battery and if a short develops anywhere along it, you're in big trouble. The coil current is an amp or so. We could use a relay that could handle the large current flows with a coil that uses much less current, but then the spring that releases the contacts would be really light and any fusion at all at the contacts would keep it closed, defeating its whole purpose. One end of the contactor coil is typically connected at the contactor's battery terminal, and the other goes to the master switch that grounds it when we want the contactor closed. This limits the max current on this one "always-hot" wire to one amp. A short will close the contactor, not cause a fire. Dan |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 3, 6:59*am, wrote:
On Nov 2, 11:46 pm, cavelamb wrote: * If you had no contactor and had instead a big switch on the panel, you have a large wire coming into the cockpit. That large wire goes directly to the battery and if a short develops anywhere along it, you're in big trouble. I have a 30Amp fuse mounted on the battery box, #8 wire to the mechanical master switch on the dash, extra jacket on wire, smaller fuses for accessories. Starter solenoid mounted on battery box, cable with firesleeve jacket, pushbutton starter switch. I'd rather blow a fuse than heat the wire, either way, no power. What do you think? Ed |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Master cylinders | [email protected] | Home Built | 25 | July 29th 08 02:08 AM |
Battery Contactor Diode? | Skrud | Home Built | 25 | September 11th 06 06:17 PM |
PA28-180 Power Contactor Relay source? | Mike Noel | Owning | 5 | August 10th 05 04:40 AM |
Master Switch | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 23 | July 20th 05 01:46 AM |
RC Plane Master | Steve | Simulators | 0 | December 20th 03 02:40 PM |