![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jim Burns" wrote: The "he was a passenger" is a cop out. wrong. What part of "passenger" don't you understand? -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Along those lines.... I had a friend, a PPL, non instrument rated that had a
172, infact, he was the influence that got me interested in flying. Fully capable of doing the PIC job, over 1000 hours at the time, I never had a reason to doubt it, until one trip. After I got my PPL and then my IR, we and our wives took a trip together, his airplane, he as PIC for the whole trip. However, I also planned it, both ways, there and back, and carried my charts and plates along "just in case". Before our trip home, he got the weather and filed VFR. I also got the weather and noted the FA at home called for increasing cloudiness and lowering ceilings. We took off and headed out. The weather was just as forecast. Ceilings started to come down, so he descended. Up ahead it was obvious that a lower layer was also coming in below us. His solution?? "We'll just stay here (VFR) between layers then circle down over the interstate and follow it home." He couldn't hold altitude within 500 feet while we were between layers. That was when the flight became MY responsibility, even though I was not PIC and was just a passenger, I became PIC and relieved him of his "responsibility". I called center, filed IFR, flew the rest of the way home, shot the approach down to about 800 ft AGL. Everybody agreed that was better than flying 300 miles following the interstate at 800 agl. Sometimes it pays to do what you can instead of just what is required. The concept of PIC does not relinquish another person from the responsibility they have to themselves and their family. The PIC is in charge of the flight, no doubt, but I'm still in charge of me and when my responsibilities to myself and my family conflict with another persons responsibilities as PIC, I'd rather be prepared to offer the PIC alternatives. Jim "Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... The "he was a passenger" is a cop out. If you are a pilot, even a student pilot with only 30 hours, and you are in the airplane, why wouldn't you do everything you could to be prepared?? Perhaps because you understand the concept of PIC and take it seriously. So you understand that the flight is not in any way your responsibility; and you have no reason to doubt that the person who *is* responsible is capable of doing the job. (Or if you *do* have reason to doubt that, then you shouldn't agree to the trip no matter how "prepared" you are.) --Gary |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But I don't understand why you leap to the conclusion that the student *didn't* take an interest in planning the flight. I'll agree with you that I did jump to that conclusion. Some of the things that I do automatically when taking trips, I am sure other people do not do at all. I should not begin to guess what type of prep the student pilot did. I guess two pilots planning the same route could get lost in unfamiliar territory and neither realize where they were. I would hope that two heads and four eyes would tilt the odds more in their favor, perhaps not. What irritates me the most is that Shaeffer hasn't shown us that he understood the complexity of the area other than the Camp David P area. That relaxed attitude would not be something that I would want a student exposed to when flying in that airspace. Maybe more will come out and we won't have to speculate, you make some valid points. Jim |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Fry" wrote in message
... I wonder if the student was going to try to log the time? As what? There's no provision for logging time as a passenger. They should bust him too. A real couple of bozos. I think pilots who don't understand the difference between a PIC and a non-pilot passenger should be busted and required to have remedial training in the FARs. ![]() --Gary |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they were willing, I think it would be of great benefit for a magazine
like AOPA's Flight Training to interview both of them and ask them questions from the pilots, students, and instructors point of view, rather than just the news media interviewing them from the talking head "you almost got shot down and could have killed the President" point of view. One question that I'd have is whether they had a current Washington terminal chart aboard. Maybe both pilots did everything they were capable of. Shaeffer has already said he did. Jim "Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... That was when the flight became MY responsibility, even though I was not PIC and was just a passenger, I became PIC and relieved him of his "responsibility". I called center, filed IFR, flew the rest of the way home, shot the approach down to about 800 ft AGL. Everybody agreed that was better than flying 300 miles following the interstate at 800 agl. Sometimes it pays to do what you can instead of just what is required. The concept of PIC does not relinquish another person from the responsibility they have to themselves and their family. The PIC is in charge of the flight, no doubt, but I'm still in charge of me and when my responsibilities to myself and my family conflict with another persons responsibilities as PIC, I'd rather be prepared to offer the PIC alternatives. Cool story! Good thing you were prepared and capable! I certainly agree that it's a great idea for any passenger to provide redundancy to the best of his or her ability. I just don't think it's warranted to criticize a passenger for choosing not to on a particular flight. Evem a pilot passenger might just choose to take a nap instead. And (as I elaborated in another post just now), I don't think there's much evidence that this student *wasn't* taking full interest in the flight. He was doing all the flying; and he and the PIC have stated that they both did pre-flight planning of their route (between the Camp David ADIZ and the DC ADIZ). But they somehow got extremely lost while trying to follow that route. --Gary |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 May 2005 19:22:49 -0700, "Jim Burns"
wrote in :: One question that I'd have is whether they had a current Washington terminal chart aboard. That is the first question I'd ask also. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Burns" wrote in message
... I expect any student pilot passengers that ride along on cross country flights with me to at least show the initiative and interest to figure out where we're going, how long it will take, how we're going to get there, and if we stray off course could we end up running into anything or possibly get shot down by F16's. If they don't want to do the work at home, we can do it I think Gary and Jim both got good point, but definitely the real experience of the student pilot is an important factor. If he doesn't know anything about navigation yet, maybe its ok, but if he does, he should have shown iniciative to try to see the flight plan and see what's going on. At least whenI started doing crosscountries, I became very interested in the routings to take. Now as a pilot, I always try to contribute positively with the PIC, and I'll even tell him that I think to do something is a bad idea if I really think it is. I know I'm not the PIC, but still I have a responsibility with myself and my family and my friend, the PIC, to try to help as much as I can. The fact that I am not PIC doesnt mean that I am going to ignore whatever I think its dangerous just because I'm not PIC. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Fry" wrote in message
... "i" == iflyatiger writes: i Did anybody else watch the video ? He is claiming that the i student was at the controls the whole time !! And when asked i if he would do anything different next time he said he would i have taken the controls and turned away from Washington. i Does anybody believe this new story ? I believe the pilot is a confused coward who, having screwed up, isn't man enough to admit it, and instead is more or less blaming the student pilot! I wonder if the student was going to try to log the time? They should bust him too. A real couple of bozos. Agree that blaming the student is the most coward thing to do. It doesn't matter who was driving, but who was the pilot in command. If the airplane had an autopilot, maybe he would have blamed the autopilot!!! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And just how was a student pilot to "assume PIC" when it wasn't legal for him to do so?
Using the emergency clause. I saw the interview and the writups, and really cannot accept at face value what was said. It just doesn't wash. But another possibility occurs to me. I don't know how much time the other pilot had, or how much recent time. But just suppose... idle wild speculation The pilot hadn't flown much lately, was very rusty, and knew it, and wanted to get to wherever. He's not really fit to do it himself, so asks the student to fly him. The student was interested in some CC experience, but of course can't be PIC and can't take passengers. No problem - the pilot can =be= PIC for the trip, and let the student do the flying and navigating and such. (Aside from the possibly inadvertent lack of currency of the pilot) this makes it legal. They go off, each figuring the other is responsible for this or that aspect of the flight. The pilot did most of his flying in the old days, perhaps even before TCAs, but doesn't give the ADIZ depicted on the chart its due (flying in a TCA area one just ducks under the tiers and doesn't have to talk to anyone, no big deal, this other thing is probably the same). The student hasn't gotten to this part of the curriculum, and accepts the straight line that the pilot has drawn. They end up where they are, befuddled, each for different reasons. /idle wild speculation. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry about that. I right clicked on the 'Play' button, and selected
'Properties' and cut out the URL. It should have provided the correct URL to play the video, but ... If you search for 'Pilot' on the http://video.msn.com/ page, it will be one of the choices returned. I finally got it to play. I had to use IE (no surprise, this is a Microsoft site) and activate flash, and also sneak in from behind. Of course I deactivated flash as soon as I finished. I hope MSN didn't shove any "free" software on me while I wasn't looking. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Can a Private Pilot tow gliders and get paid? | zatatime | Piloting | 3 | October 17th 04 01:35 AM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |