BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Does anyone else see a pattern
with the Democratic Party.
Seems they preach and preach about freedom, but always do their best to
take it away from us against The Constitution. It's frustrating!



Stop with this garbage about the Democratic party. Those wanting to take
our freedoms and everything else from us come from both parties so cut the
crap and be prepared to defend those rights from assault no matter which
party they come from.

"john smith" wrote in message
...
This from a state whose tourism slogan is... "Virgina is for Lovers!"


Well, New Jersey's slogan is "The Garden State."

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
See
the point, it is christianity that is under attack.

Oooook...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else
choose to marry.


It places no restrictions on who anybody can marry.


I sure hope you look out for other traffic better than you look out for this
country's freedoms.

Your politics gives you a whopping blind spot, and there is a torpedo
heading right toward you.

Well Pete I have defended the Constitution have you? VET USMC
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Does anyone else see a pattern
with the Democratic Party.
Seems they preach and preach about freedom, but always do their best
to
take it away from us against The Constitution. It's frustrating!



Stop with this garbage about the Democratic party. Those wanting to take
our freedoms and everything else from us come from both parties so cut the
crap and be prepared to defend those rights from assault no matter which
party they come from.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:59:36 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote:

If the church tells us what marriage "WILL BE" is
that not establishing religion..

Yes, and our constitution prohibits this country from passing it AS
LAW.

wrote:

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:59:36 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote:

If the church tells us what marriage "WILL BE" is
that not establishing religion..

Yes, and our constitution prohibits this country from passing it AS
LAW.

Unfortunately, our Constitution is not self-limiting. That is, if we pass
an amendment which makes the US a theocracy, a theocracy it will be.

The only real protection we have is that the threshold for passing an
amendment is set relatively high.

- Andrew

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:43:13 -0400, "W P Dixon"
wrote:

You are so ****ing blind to what's happening that it's really
pathetic. Get your head out of the Bible and look at reallity for a
change, see what freedoms are being lost and you aren't saying
anything because it's that **** poor excuse for a man that's sitting
his useless ass in the white house you're surrendering rights to
without a whimper.

Patriot act, Hitler would have been proud of that one, hold someone
forever without charges and no access to representation. No need for
charges, infinite incarceration for suspicion. Lovely.

Go to any airport. Lean on the fence and watch planes taking off and
landing. Felony now.

I am no longer even a student pilot, don't own a plane anymore, by
LAW, as defined by the GWeeB and cohorts, I have no business at the
gliderport, even if I'm invited. Not that I give a ****, gliderports
are enclaves of rich old conservatives, normal conversation is not
possible without the stock market being the highest subject.

WHen it comes to religion and Christianity, maybe you'd better read up
on some of the history first. Some of the most horrible atrocities
that any man can do to another happened under the supervision of
priests. They, of course, were exempt from their own judgment
methods. How far could you walk with red hot iron in your hands,
knowing you're going to die if you drop it? Brilliant scientists,
Galileo being one prime example, were arrested for making discoveries
that were NOT in the BIble, and therefore must be false. He only
spent his last ten years under house arrest, ordered by the church.
Copericus did not publish his work until he was on his death bed, for
the same reasons. Kepler was chased from country to country because
of his work. All in the name of Good Christians. Maybe you'd better
find some other ground to stand on to look down at the rest of us.

We have already crossed the line... The government already allows special privileges to 'married' couples that single
folks do not have. If marriage is as defined by 'religion', and the government freezes that definition into law, then
the government is establishing a religion - contrary to the constitution.

There should be no special government considerations given to 'married' folks, regardless of the institution that
defined the 'marriage.

But this is way OT....



Here is a sample letter someone passed my way:

Dear Congressman,



I just heard about H.R. 5053 introduced by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.). I strongly request that you NOT support this
bill and actively seek to stop the passage of this bill in any form.



As a private pilot that understands general aviation I strongly disagree with the assumptions presumed by this bill.
This bill proposes to add SEVERE restriction to all aviation activity, exempting the airlines, in the name of furthering
security. Shamefully this bill again attacks general aviation which government and private security experts have
continually said does not present a significant threat.



This bill imposes major increases in government regulation and raises major costs for all parties involved. It will
also severely restricts use of major public and private infrastructure throughout the nation, 17,000 landing facilities
and more than 200,000 aircraft. Those numbers represent ENORMOUS investment of both public and private funds. Those
investments generate substantial business activity throughout our economy.



A bill like this does nothing to increase security but does further restrict the freedom of law abiding citizens. I
would ask that you not just work to keep America free, but work to keep in place the freedoms Americans treasure.



Thank you,

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Well Pete I have defended the Constitution have you? VET USMC

Being a veteran does not prove you have defended the Constitution. Your
words tell a lot about you.
Are you so blinded by your politics and religion that you do not see the
danger of your viewpoint?