If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:b851c.28570$PR3.506599@attbi_s03... You are under the mistaken assumption that only really big businesses are corporations. This just proves your ignorance on the topic of the economy. "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" and "Republicans". It has nothing to do with reality. Quite. Take a good look at the Fortune 500 and see how many are "run" by Republicans. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:nj81c.25354$ko6.219040@attbi_s02... I think he meant me... The "other" Jay Whoops! Sorry, Jay! "You can call me Jay, or you can call me...." |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
You have no idea what you are talking about. The Corporation I work for serves about 100 clients. In many different industries. Number of employees at each range from 3 to around 100. Of our 100 clients only 4 are Sole Props, 10 are LLC (what we here in Arkansas call partnerships and also a type of corporations) and the rest are Corporations. You are under the mistaken assumption that only really big businesses are corporations. This just proves your ignorance on the topic of the economy. In this situation you may be right. But, I am trying to illustrate that "combined number of proprietorships and partnerships in the United States is more than five times the number of corporations." Because of this statement, I only assume that my previous comment might be more accurute. Since you explain that only four of them belong to partnerships, then I am mistaken. However, the question is still left unanswered: Everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in was probably produced by a corporation and could be produced in no other way. How can we prove that corportations produce more products than the combined sole proprietorship and partnership? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck wrote: "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" .... And "rich" is defined as anyone who makes twice what I do. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
S Green wrote: Why not Altimeters simply can't be set that high. The adjustment mechanism doesn't have the range. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
the adjustment range to set the altimeter to the proper pressure will not
move to adjust 2800ft of altitude. try it some time, to adjust from a "standard 29.92" at sea level. Move that altimeter to my airport at 2833MSL and it still says 29.92, now try to move it to read 0, this would require you to move the setting more than 2800 feet which exceeds the capability of a standard aviation altimeter. BT "S Green" wrote in message ... Why not "BTIZ" wrote in message news:fg81c.12502$id3.1896@fed1read01... you can't set QFE when the field elevation is that high above sea level BT "Joe Morris" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" writes: The pilot survived, right? His health is fine. His career, I sadly suspect, is not. A comment from one of the ASF people at a CFIRC I was at over the past weekend was that he is now flying a desk at the Pentagon. The same man stated that the problem was that the pilot had become too comfortable with practicing the maneuver at his home base, which was about 800 (+/-; I don't recall the exact number) feet lower than the airfield at which the accident occurred. At the accident location he set up the split-S so that the top was at the proper altitude MSL -- at his home base, meaning that the entire maneuver was executed 800 feet lower than it should have been. I have *no* military jet experience, but especially for airshows I'm somewhat surprised that there isn't an altimeter set to QFE to serve as a sanity check against exactly this sort of problem. Joe Morris |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Toks Desalu wrote: In this situation you may be right. But, I am trying to illustrate that "combined number of proprietorships and partnerships in the United States is more than five times the number of corporations." And you think it follows from that that all the stuff corporations sell are made by those small businesses? No way. One medium size corporation is the productive equivalent of about 8,000 sole proprietorships, and even the parts for most items we buy could not be made by one or two people. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" ..... And "rich" is defined as anyone who makes twice what I do. Ahhhh...the traditional definition of _rich_ is someone who merely has a dollar more than you. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Quite. Take a good look at the Fortune 500 and see how many are "run" by
Republicans. That's because they are "productive" -- a concept that the Democratic Party should be embracing, rather than disdaining. Take this to the bank: If the Democratic Party would lose their "I'm-a-victim-and-you-owe-me" wing of their party, they would easily be able to attract a majority of Fortune 500 CEOs, if only as a reaction to the Republican Party's swing toward the Religious Right. In my opinion, the vast majority of Republicans are quite uneasy with the direction their party is going, and are ripe for the picking. As the Democrats stand today, however, few productive members of society can support them. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Capitalist running dog!!!
You know you're reached a certain level of success when you hear those words... Ah, my dream has been fulfilled! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Great shot of the Thunderbird F-16 Ejection | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | February 3rd 04 10:31 PM |
Thunderbird pilot found at fault in Mountain Home AFB crash | Ditch | Military Aviation | 5 | January 27th 04 01:32 AM |
Sunday's Crash in LI Sound | Marco Leon | Piloting | 0 | November 5th 03 04:34 PM |
Thunderbird crash photos | mowkie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 21st 03 04:49 PM |
Thunderbird crash today | John Doe | Military Aviation | 12 | September 16th 03 05:56 AM |