If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. From level flight at slow-normal cruise, with plenty of altitude to spare (i.e 5000 AGL), pull the power back to idle and bank the thing over to almost 60 degrees letting the nose fall over in a slow steep banked 180 degree turn. Watch your airspeed and make sure it stays at or below Va. Level out and then do it again in the opposite bank, to make a big falling slow figure-8 pattern as you descend. Keep your bank at or below 60 degrees and the nose down angle less than 30 degrees and you're still legal. Because you're not maintaining level flight in the 60 deg banks, you're not really pulling any Gs in the banks either. The most Gs you pull is when you level out after you're done with the steep banks. Maybe 1.5 Gs at the most if you're sloppy about it. One of my favorite "fun" things since you get a windshield full of straight-down plus a wee bit of almost-zero-G feeling without hardly any stress on the aircraft at all. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"One's Too Many" wrote in message om... Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. From level flight at slow-normal cruise, with plenty of altitude to spare (i.e 5000 AGL), pull the power back to idle and bank the thing over to almost 60 degrees letting the nose fall over in a slow steep banked 180 degree turn. Watch your airspeed and make sure it stays at or below Va. Level out and then do it again in the opposite bank, to make a big falling slow figure-8 pattern as you descend. Keep your bank at or below 60 degrees and the nose down angle less than 30 degrees and you're still legal. Because you're not maintaining level flight in the 60 deg banks, you're not really pulling any Gs in the banks either. The most Gs you pull is when you level out after you're done with the steep banks. Maybe 1.5 Gs at the most if you're sloppy about it. One of my favorite "fun" things since you get a windshield full of straight-down plus a wee bit of almost-zero-G feeling without hardly any stress on the aircraft at all. Got a ride in an L19 tow plane once. This is how they got down quick for the next tow. What a hoot! One plop to the left and one to the right and 3,000 feet of altitude disappeared in a few seconds. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"darryl" wrote in message m... "Anyone" wrote in message ... Get acro instruction in a Pitts, Decathlon, etc. Doing what you want in a 172, while maybe possible, is dangerous and quite honestly, a little sad. It's like trying to race a Geo Metro. I've got nothing against the 172, it's just not well suited for what you want. The FBO I rent from rents a Decathlon for $10/hr more than their SP's. I'm sure you can find one for about what you pay for the 172. BTW - your comment "stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick"... a 172SP doesn't have a stick, it has a wheel. Sticks are for acro's, a 172 isn't an acro. "Koopas Ly" wrote in message om... Me again, Va seems to be only intended to protect against excessive positive load factors. What about negative g's? Can I find a Va for negative design load factors (-1.52 g) for the C172SP anywhere? Reason I am asking is that I want to try the "floating pencil" trick next time I fly but I don't want to shove the stick fully forward for fear of breaking something. I am not looking to induce negative g's, only zero g's and zero lift. Any pointers on entry speed and power settings? Is it easier to perform if you induce a gradual +1 g steep climb similar to a departure stall maneuver, then upon hearing the stall horn, give it good nudge forward on the stick? I've heard that your airspeed may indicate well below stall, but again, your stall speed does approach zero as your load factor goes to zero. Likewise, would you prefer to pull 2 positive g's in a pull-up maneuver or a, say, 60 deg. bank? Frankly, I am not too familiar with the former so I might do something undesirable. Aside from my stall speed going up to something like 68 kts. clean (Va ~ 100 kts), you'd see your airspeed quickly dwindling while pulling up. I think it'd be fruitless to add in power since heck, you're not maintaining altitude and besides, you probably don't have any excess power anyway to do that. Neither am I familiar with the mechanics of loops so it'd be wiser to leave that alone. Perhaps the 60 deg. bank is more reasonable to have some fun. Would you try to hold altitude with backpressure and power or just leave the plane to dive and speed up in the spiral, with a recovery before Vne? I think the maneuver would be more innocuous with power-off a-la-emergency-descent style. Again, I've never done a 60 deg. bank...so I should probably leave that alone too until I try it with a passenger...oops..i mean CFI. Seriously, if someone has something to suggest that's fun and safe, within normal operating range and category, please suggest. It's a buddy's bday soon and he wants to go up. Again, I am not looking for doing anything aerobatic. Alright, I can see the flames and derision coming from the mainland May you have a peaceful week with no stress, Alex Aside from the 172 not being stressed for fooling around like this it is a pain in the backside. Not quite like a truck, more like going to a sports car race in a SUV. A good plane to get aero in would be a 150 aerobat (did they make a 152 aerobat?) I'm assuming you've been flying mostly Cessnas. The feel and controls will be familiar and you will have to finesses it to get clean manuvers. You can avoid the trouble of "taming a taildragger" and still learn some good stuff and have some fun. You can go for the Serious Iron later if you get addicted. Darryl 46 Taylorcraft You can avoid the trouble of "taming a taildragger" It'll make him a better pilot if he learns. If he can't control the plane well enough to land a taildragger he shouldn't be doing acro. Trikes are for kids and wheels are for cars. Taildragger with a stick is the only way to go. '46 Taylorcraft - nice, very nice. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Paul Sengupta wrote: People flying inverted usually manage to find dirt they never knew about. Once they find it, they know about it, though. I hear that it seems to wind up in the eyes. George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Paul Sengupta wrote: He remarked that it wasn't quite so critical to get the nose down so quickly. I didn't like stalls in my primary training. With the Cessna, you get the nose a bit down, put the throttle in, get the carb heat off, and bring the flaps up. I would slam the throttle forward with the palm of my hand, while getting the carb heat off with my thumb. My instructor said it wasn't necessary to move that fast. After the third practice run for the day, she told me that she had recently had a candidate who had been criticized by the examiner for not getting the plane cleaned up rapidly enough. She said "When I send you over, I'm going to call him up and say 'Have I got a candidate for you!'". George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"darryl" wrote in message
m... Aside from the 172 not being stressed for fooling around like this it is a pain in the backside. A 60 degree turn and a 0g bunt? Paul |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
For added effect use an aerobatic plane and bank to just over
the 90 degrees. Got my g-meter up to about 3 pulling out of one of those. Paul "One's Too Many" wrote in message om... From level flight at slow-normal cruise, with plenty of altitude to spare (i.e 5000 AGL), pull the power back to idle and bank the thing over to almost 60 degrees letting the nose fall over in a slow steep banked 180 degree turn. Watch your airspeed and make sure it stays at or below Va. Level out and then do it again in the opposite bank, to make a big falling slow figure-8 pattern as you descend. Keep your bank at or below 60 degrees and the nose down angle less than 30 degrees and you're still legal. Because you're not maintaining level flight in the 60 deg banks, you're not really pulling any Gs in the banks either. The most Gs you pull is when you level out after you're done with the steep banks. Maybe 1.5 Gs at the most if you're sloppy about it. One of my favorite "fun" things since you get a windshield full of straight-down plus a wee bit of almost-zero-G feeling without hardly any stress on the aircraft at all. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Ever see the Americas Funniest Video where the camera shows two people in
the front seat of a small plane. The shadow is changing, but you can't tell what they're up to untill the dog comes floating up out of the back seat, does a quarter turn and floats up in between them. It's hilarious. mike regish "Rich Stowell" wrote in message om... FAR 91.303, Aerobatic Flight, states in pertinent part: "For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or an abnormal acceleration, not neccessary for normal flight." In the context of the Cessna 172, it could be argued (especially by an ornery FAA-type) that the "float the pencil" maneuver results in both "an abnormal attitude" and an "abnormal acceleration," and is "not necessary for normal flight." What exactly constitutes an "aerobatic maneuver" is left open for interpretation, and in the end depends on who's looking... And while the reply below is good, it is debatable whether or not it is the ONLY sensible one thus far. Given that the original poster has never done this before, isn't it prudent to suggest he get some dual in the particular maneuver before attempting it by himself, or worse, attempting it for the first time with the plane loaded with someone else's kids??? Rich http://www.richstowell.com Robert Moore wrote in message .7... (Dan Thomas) wrote It can be done from cruise speed. Pull up into a shallow climb, then start pushing forward, increasing pressure until the pencil comes off the panel. It'll feel like negative G's but isn't. The only stress on the airplane occurs when you pull out of the shallow dive created by the maneuver. You don't have to get the nose way up or down at all, and it doesn't require abrupt, or anywhere near full, control inputs. Kids love it. The ONLY sensible post in this whole thread! I "float" stuff with all of my new students, makes them feel like an astronaut. And that's in a Cessna-172. Who cares if the engine sputters? All of you sissies go back to MSFS. Its not an aerobatic maneuver and doesn't require areobatic training! Bob Moore ATP CFI |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
If I moved the throttle forward too quickly on the 172 I learned
on, there would be an almighty bang as it backfired and it would cough and splutter and take longer to pick up again. I learned quickly to move the throttle forward smoothly! Paul "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... I would slam the throttle forward with the palm of my hand, while getting the carb heat off with my thumb. My instructor said it wasn't necessary to move that fast. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
In article 0yuzb.19348$_M.65660@attbi_s54,
"mike regish" wrote: Ever see the Americas Funniest Video where the camera shows two people in the front seat of a small plane. The shadow is changing, but you can't tell what they're up to untill the dog comes floating up out of the back seat, does a quarter turn and floats up in between them. I didn't see that video but I did see my wife to the same thing one day when we hit a rather strong windshear. It's hilarious. For me, not so much for her. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 04 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |