![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hickey wrote:
Consider that a pneumatic tire supports the weight by the air pressure that's in it - and that the contact patch of the tire is approximately the weight on the tire in pounds divided by the pressure in psi. That means on the hypothetical plane above (2,250 pounds, 15psi), the contact patch (total) for the three tires would be around 150 square inches. That's 50 square inches per tire, which on a 5.00 tire is otherwise known as "a flat". Mark Hickey Agreed. More accurately, however, for this airplane there would be about 1000 lb on each main at gross weight which, as you note, would result in very flat 5.00-5 tires at 15 psi. The 45 psi recommendation is correct. - anon |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "VideoFlyer" wrote in message ... 45 lbs??? 55 lbs for the nose gear??? That seems awfully high. Those tires will be hard as a rock. I guess I'd prefer a little softer tire to land on. I rarely put in more than about 15 to 20 lbs. 5 lbs will "get the sidewall off the ground." It would depend on the all up weight of the aircraft, our Rallye 100 weighs in at a gross weight of 1700 lbs and the tire pressures are 21 in the nose wheel and 25 in the mains. -- .. -- Cheers, Jonathan Lowe whatever at antispam dot net No email address given because of spam. Antispam trap in place |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ben Haas wrote: Hey, that BOb is sooooo happy he is using my name ....I will post the thread where BOb got honest with us about 50 years of accident free flight.It is titled HI VIS Paint, For your reading pleasure and a good laugh read the whole thread to see BOb unravel and back peddle. I cannot wait to see what new heading he will use with my name in it. G..... B. B. wrote in message . .. Lets see what airplanes have you have built and fly? Would love to see a picture of them. A single engine Private Pilot. How much IFR do you fly Ben? Lets hear some of your riveting stories...ok? You seem overly obsessed with Bob. Maybe a little jealous or are you just infatuated with him and afraid to show how you really feel? Maybe you have a really strong crush on him. Jerry |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well....you're right, -anon. I obviously have no experience with 5:00-5 tires
on a 2250 lb gross weight canard aircraft or I wouldn't be "spewing" such ignorance. But you might notice that I didn't say in my post that 15-20 lbs was the correct, or even recommended, pressure. I am sorry to have contaminated this group with an opinion, an observation and personal experience. Mea culpa, mea culpa. My experience with 5:00-5 tires is on much lighter aircraft. And while I didn't mean to be "spewing ignorance" my experience nonetheless is that pressures of 45-55 lbs makes the tires on my Rans pretty hard. If you would like to tell me that my experience is not valid somehow, feel free. To the original poster...if you want truly accurate information on this newsgroup, "anon" is the person you want to consult. If you're looking for feedback from other people interested in this hobby, better check with "-anon" as well...just so you don't get splattered with more "spewed ignorance." Flyer (foot firmly implanted in mouth) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
anon wrote:
Peter Dohm wrote: n o t n e c e s s a r i l y Trivial in this case, as the tires were not alleged to have gone flat. However, it is a frequently employed method to protect the wheels, and sometimes the tires, while the parts (tubes in this case) are obtained. IIRC, no assertion was made that this was an adiquate temporary service for flight, or even ground operation. Peter My bad. I incorrectly assumed that his #1 response was his reply to the first question about correct tire pressures and his #2 response was his reply to the second question about flat tires. His reply makes perfect sense now that I realize, thanks to you, that both answers were in response to the flat tire question. Apologies to all concerned. My pressure recommendations stand. I will now slither back under my rock. - anon I really was not trying to be that much of a prick. Especially for a canard aircraft, for which there is probably not a formal POH, the tire manufacturer may be of some help. My recollection, admittedly as a student-pilot twenty years ago, is that a Cessna 150/152 with the optional 6.00x6 main tires (5.00x? was standard IIRC) had generally better balanced handling with around 25 psi in the main tires than with 30 psi; which I believe was recommended for the standard tires. The problem that it corrected was not so much that the mains were "bouncy", at the higher pressure, although they were and the lower pressure corrected it nicely; but that the plane did not gain excessive speed on the taxiways at just above idle. Therefore, you could reasonably warm up the engine and taxi out at the same time without additional wear on the brakes. In other words; it was practical to be kind to the FBO, even when renting by hobbs time. There was a very small increment in the take-off roll on smooth concrete, which probably would have been an equally slight decrement on turf or very well maintained grass, when compared to the higher pressure. And, of course much less braking was required after landing... Peter |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My pressure recommendations stand. I will now slither back under my rock. - anon ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ You anonymous recommendations stand? Whoopee for you and your rock, brave heart. Barnyard BOb -- |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
*Barnyard BOb* wrote:
You anonymous recommendations stand? Whoopee for you and your rock, brave heart. Barnyard BOb -- You are a foolish foolish man. - anon |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My pressure recommendations stand. I will now slither back under my rock. - anon You anonymous recommendations stand? Whoopee for you and your rock, brave heart. Barnyard BOb -- You are a foolish foolish man. - anon ++++++++++++++++++++ Sorry, pathetic one. As an anal tight-ass coward... your words have no weight. Your rock awaits. Go for it. Barnyard BOb -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Manifold pressure gauge problem | Dave Russell | Aerobatics | 3 | January 29th 04 03:46 AM |
Nosewheel Shimmy and Scalloped Tire Redux, Plus | Larry Smith | Home Built | 2 | September 15th 03 04:03 PM |
Scalloped Nosewheel Tire | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | September 12th 03 09:16 PM |
Fuel pressure Problems | smf | Home Built | 3 | September 7th 03 08:25 PM |
Pressure Differential in heat Exchangers | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 4 | July 3rd 03 05:18 AM |